· Public charity
Fuller E Callaway Professorial Chairs Tr
Provide funds for establishment of professorial chairs at senior colleges and graduate schools to retain and add superior faculty
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k5 grants · $204k
- $50k–250k9 grants · $992k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSTIY OF GEORGIA | $226,713 |
| GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY | $160,616 |
| GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY | $144,393 |
| GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY | $139,130 |
| UNIVERSITY OF NORTH GEORGIA | $77,749 |
| BERRY COLLEGE | $75,383 |
| AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY | $60,290 |
| UNIVERSITY OF WEST GEORGIA | $57,661 |
| GEORGIA SOUTHWESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY | $50,321 |
| OGLETHORPE UNIVERSITY | $49,936 |
| BRENAU UNIVERSITY | $48,373 |
| VALDOSTA STATE UNIVERSITY | $44,220 |
| FORT VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY | $32,080 |
| TOCCOA FALLS COLLEGE | $29,513 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 91% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against -5% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $205k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BCBERRY COLLEGE INC5× · 2020–2024 · $370k · revenue +29%
- ASAlbany State University Foundation Inc4× · 2020–2023 · $245k · revenue +22%
- TFToccoa Falls College Inc5× · 2020–2024 · $140k · revenue +20%
Funded once
- CAClark Atlanta University Incgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $59k · revenue +40%
- SCSpelman Collegeone grant, 2020 · $56k · revenue -11%
- LCLaGrange Collegeone grant, 2020 · $40k · revenue -5%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The College is an institution of higher education and provides instruction and various support services in achieving its purpose.
Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.
Since 1902, Franklin University has been a pioneer in meeting the needs of adult students who have the ambition to continue their education in combination with other responsibilities, receiving its status as a tax exempt organization in…
The mission of the University is to inspire independent thinkers who become trustworthy, effective leaders that shape caring communities. The vision of the University of Lynchburg is to cultivate a world that is innovative, authentic, and…
Union Institute & University educates highly motivated adults who seek academic programs to engage, enlighten, and empower them to pursue professional goals and a lifetime of learning and service. Offering accredited bachelors, masters,…
Is to provide educational opportunities for gifted students who have limited academic experiences and resources but unlimited potential for leadership in society.
Education and Public Service Mission: Rollins College educates students for global citizenship and responsible leadership, empowering graduates to pursue meaningful lives and productive careers. We are committed to liberal arts ethos and…
Allen University is an academic community which provides students an opportunity to obtain baccalaureate and graduate degrees in liberal arts and professional programs in traditional and distance education formats. The University has a…
To ensure that the student body experiences balanced intellectual, psychological, social and spiritual development, aimed at enabling them to become active productive members of society where they live and work.
Coker university is a student-centered, comprehensive university. it is dedicated to providing every student an academic curriculum based upon a uniformly excellent liberal arts core that enhances the structured development of key personal…
Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…
See Disclosure Above.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Spelman College and the most unlike its peers is Interdenominational Theological Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BERRY COLLEGE INC ↗
- Who funds Albany State University Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Toccoa Falls College Inc ↗
- Who funds BRENAU UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds OGLETHORPE UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds Interdenominational Theological Center Inc ↗
- Who funds FORT VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDA INC ↗
- Who funds Valdosta State University Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Clark Atlanta University Inc ↗
- Who funds Spelman College ↗
- Who funds LaGrange College ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Tulsa Community Foundation · National Collegiate Athletic Association · Ty Cobb Educational Fd Tr Ua · Georgia Independent College Association Inc · University System of Georgia Foundation Inc & Affiliates · Watson-Brown Foundation Inc · Frances Wood Wilson Foundation Inc · Kpmg US Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of the Chattahoochee Valley Inc · Folds of Honor Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Fuller E Callaway Professorial Chairs Tr funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.