Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Fuchsg & M Fdn Tai

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
139
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$139k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.

Education$2.2MHuman Services$1.7MFood & Nutrition$1.2MArts & Culture$816kHousing & Shelter$700kHealth$636kYouth Development$340kCivil Rights$188kOther$0
02FY2025 · 139 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k81 grants · $224k
  • $10k–50k50 grants · $766k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $569k
$5,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$25M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES$139,200
EMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK$100,000
THE RESCUE MISSION$60,000
PIERCE COLLEGE FOUNDATION$60,000
TACOMA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$60,000
NOURISH PIERCE COUNTY$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND$50,000
PACIFIC LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY$48,000
ST LEO FOOD CONNECTION$40,000
PALMER SCHOLARS$36,000
ASSOCIATED MINISTRIES OF TACOMA$35,000
SOUTH SOUND OUTREACH SERVICES$20,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$20,000
YWCA PIERCE COUNTY$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $678k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PUYALLUP VALLEY ST FRANCIS HOUSE: $15k → 9%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $10k → 14%PUYALLUP VALLEY ST FRANCIS HOUSE: $10k → 9%PUYALLUP VALLEY ST FRANCIS HOUSE: $10k → 9%PUYALLUP VALLEY ST FRANCIS HOUSE: $10k → 9%PUYALLUP VALLEY ST FRANCIS HOUSE: $10k → 9%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $10k → 9%WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 9%MOCKINGBIRD SOCIETY: $8k → 9%MOCKINGBIRD SOCIETY: $7k → 9%MOCKINGBIRD SOCIETY: $7k → 9%MOCKINGBIRD SOCIETY: $7k → 9%MOCKINGBIRD SOCIETY: $7k → 9%WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 9%FREE2LUV: $5k → 9%TACOMA AREA COALITION OF INDIVIUALS: $20k → 9%TACID: $20k → 9%AMARA: $18k → 9%AMARA: $13k → 9%AMARA: $10k → 9%AMARA: $10k → 9%AMARA: $10k → 9%NW FURNITURE BANK: $5k → 9%HOPESPARKS: $15k → 9%STEP BY STEP FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $5k → 9%PUYALLUP VALLEY ST FRANCIS HOUSE: $15k → 9%THE MUSTARD SEED PROJECT OF KEY PA: $17k → 9%SOUND OUTREACH: $20k → 9%SOUND OUTREACH: $20k → 9%SOUND OUTREACH: $20k → 9%SOUTH SOUND OUTREACH SERVICES: $20k → 9%SOUND OUTREACH: $20k → 9%SOUND OUTREACH: $18k → 9%TACOMA URBAN LEAGUE: $15k → 9%TACOMA URBAN LEAGUE: $12k → 9%TACOMA URBAN LEAGUE: $12k → 9%TACOMA URBAN LEAGUE: $10k → 9%TACOMA URBAN LEAGUE: $10k → 9%TACOMA COMMUNITY HOUSE: $15k → 9%TACOMA COMMUNITY HOUSE: $15k → 9%TACOMA COMMUNITY HOUSE: $15k → 9%HOPESPARKS FAMILY SERVICES: $18k → 9%HOPESPARKS FAMILY SERVICES: $15k → 9%HOPESPARKS FAMILY SERVICES: $15k → 9%HOPESPARKS FAMILY SERVICES: $15k → 9%HOPESPARKS: $15k → 9%VETERAN RITES INC: $10k → 9%VETERAN RITES INC: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
WI
OR
PA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
DC
LA
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.9M · 151 repeat orgs$751k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

151 repeat relationships — 101 still active in FY2025, 50 since wound down; 38 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

151
46

Total granted

$7.9M
$421k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
0%

Still filing today

77%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $330k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    THE RESCUE MISSION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $365k · revenue +58%
  • RM
    R MERLE PALMER MINORITY SCHOLARSHIP
    5× · 2021–2025 · $187k · revenue +59%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2025 · $165k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • CC
    CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF WESTERN
    one grant, 2023 · $139k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON TACOMA
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • RM
    R MERLE PALMER SCHOLARSHIP
    one grant, 2020 · $34k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Promise of Pierce County

To empower families experiencing housing insecurity through intervention, prevention,and stabilization services.

Housing & Shelter
2
Re Sources

RE Sources mobilizes people of Northwest Washington to build just and thriving communities and to protect the land, water, and climate on which we all depend.

Environment
3
Olympic Peninsula Community Clinic

Improving the quality of life for the people in the Olympic Peninsula Community by providing increased access to health and wellness services for the underserved

Health
4
Bike Works Seattle

Bike Works promotes the bicycle as a vehicle for change to empower youth and build resilient communities.

Recreation & Sports
5
Puget Sound Community School

Founded in 1994, PSCS is a small, independent middle and high school located in the Chinatown/International District of downtown Seattle. PSCS is committed to co-creating a brave space for community-centered education, critical curriculum,…

—
6
Greater Tacoma Community Foundation

Acting as a catalyst, connector, and knowledge facilitator to build racially equitable, accessible, inclusive pierce county where all people can shape and activate the systems that affect our communities, now and for generations to come.

Philanthropy
7
Project Access Northwest

Project Access Northwest provides low-income families access to medical, dental and Behavioral Health care so they can live a healthier and more productive life.

Health
8
United Way of Snohomish County

United way of snohomish county improves lives for families in snohomish county by bringing people, resources, and strategy together.

Philanthropy
9
Whatcom Dispute Resolution Center

Provide and promote constructive and collaborative approaches to conflict resolution through mediation, training, facilitation, supervised visits and community education.

Unclassified
10
The Community Foundation of South Puget Sound

To grow a lasting culture of generosity and well-being in the South Puget Sound through connection, leadership, and investment.

Philanthropy
11
King County Sexual Assault Resource Center

KCSARC is the largest and most comprehensive non-profit provider of sexual assault services in King County and Washington State. Our vision is a community free of sexual violence. Our mission is to: give voice to victims, their families,…

—
12
Rainier Beach Cummunity Empowerment Coalition

Rainier Beach Action Coalition is a grassroot, Black-led organization devoted to locally driven development. It promotes quality education, living wage jobs, affordable transportation and housing, and building community capacity in…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tacoma Arts Live and the most unlike its peers is Chinese Reconciliation Project Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Music Education & Per…International Christian Dev…Youth Civic & Educational A…Pet Rescue and AdoptionProfessional Live Performan…Environmental Conservation …Independent Elementary Scho…Washington State Policy Adv…Professional Trade Associat…Regional History MuseumsFaith-Based Healthcare Syst…Immigrant & Refugee Communi…Marginalized Communities Ad…Family FoundationsSupportive Housing & Servic…Food Banks and Hunger ReliefCollege Foundation Support
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%4%<5yr15%9%5–10yr19%17%10–20yr19%33%20–35yr12%20%35–55yr12%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr15%2%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr19%29%20–35yr12%29%35–55yr12%27%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/175
the rest of the field
14%
2,245/16,388

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

165 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 165 of the 235 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
48
Early backer (in before they grew)
163/165
Grantees still filing
99/165
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PIERCE COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $355,000 · OtherPIERCE COLLEGE FOUNDATIONCATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES — $327,000 · OtherCATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICESST LEOS PARISH — $245,000 · OtherST LEOS PARISHNourish Pierce County — $155,000 · OtherCATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES HK — $154,800 · OtherFISH FOOD BANKS OF PIERCE COUNTY — $150,000 · Other+119 more — $2,903,400 · Other+119 moreTHE UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND — $315,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF PU…Pacific Lutheran University — $293,000 · EducationPacific Lutheran Uni…TACOMA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $245,000 · EducationTACOMA COMMUNITY COL…R MERLE PALMER MINORITY SCHOLARSHIP — $187,000 · EducationR MERLE PALMER MINOR…UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION — $165,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WASHIN…FOUNDATION FOR TACOMA STUDENTS — $89,000 · EducationFOUNDATION FOR TACOM…HILLTOP ARTISTS IN RESIDENCE — $78,000 · EducationARK INSTITUTE OF LEARNING — $60,000 · EducationDEGREES OF CHANGE — $56,000 · Education+4 more — $53,000 · EducationTACOMA ARTS LIVE — $99,000 · Arts & CultureTACOMA AR…SYMPHONY TACOMA — $92,000 · Arts & CultureSYMPHONY …Tacoma Art Museum — $87,000 · Arts & CultureTacoma Ar…GREENTRIKE — $84,000 · Arts & CultureGREENTRIK…TACOMA OPERA ASSOCIATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES — $75,000 · Arts & CultureTACOMA OP…NORTHWEST SINFONIETTA INC — $64,000 · Arts & CultureNORTHWEST…Tacoma Little Theatre and Drama League Inc — $61,000 · Arts & CultureTacoma Li…Museum of Glass — $40,000 · Arts & CultureMuseum of…TACOMA YOUTH SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $24,000 · Arts & Culture+9 more — $73,000 · Arts & Culture+9 moreSOUTH SOUND OUTREACH SERVICES — $118,000 · Human ServicesSOUTH SOU…HopeSparks — $93,000 · Human ServicesHopeSpark…Puyallup Valley St Francis House — $70,000 · Human ServicesPuyallup …AMARA — $60,000 · Human ServicesAMARATacoma Urban League — $59,000 · Human ServicesTacoma Ur…Tacoma Community House — $45,000 · Human ServicesTacoma Co…TACID — $40,000 · Human ServicesTACIDTHE MOCKINGBIRD SOCIETY — $36,000 · Human ServicesVETERAN RITES INC — $27,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $25,000 · Human Services+15 more — $114,500 · Human Services+15 moreEMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK OF TACOMA AND PIERCE COUNTY — $505,000 · Food & NutritionEMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK — $100,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more — $4,000 · Food & NutritionTHE RESCUE MISSION — $365,000 · Housing & ShelterRebuilding Together South Sound — $42,000 · Housing & ShelterNEW PHOEBE HOUSE — $40,000 · Housing & ShelterTACOMAPIERCE COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANIT — $40,000 · Housing & ShelterHELPING HAND HOUSE — $33,000 · Housing & Shelter+2 more — $6,000 · Housing & ShelterMARY BRIDGE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $60,000 · HealthAHAT Homecare — $52,000 · HealthOLIVE CREST — $49,500 · HealthASHLEY HOUSE — $45,000 · HealthSOUTH SOUND CARE FOUNDATION — $23,000 · HealthTREEHOUSE INC — $23,000 · HealthCATHERINE PLACE — $20,000 · Health+2 more — $7,000 · Health
Other$4,290,200Education$1,541,000Arts & Culture$699,000Human Services$687,500Food & Nutrition$609,000Housing & Shelter$526,000Health$279,500

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK OF TACOMA AND PIERCE COUNTY — $505,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHE RESCUE MISSION — $365,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetPIERCE COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $355,000 over 6y, 12% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND — $315,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPacific Lutheran University — $293,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTACOMA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $245,000 over 4y, 7.7% of budgetR MERLE PALMER MINORITY SCHOLARSHIP — $187,000 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION — $165,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNourish Pierce County — $155,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetMOUNT CARMEL GUILD BEHAVIORAL HEALTH — $139,200 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSOUTH SOUND OUTREACH SERVICES — $118,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetYWCA PIERCE COUNTY — $100,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetEMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK — $100,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetSAFE STREETS CAMPAIGN — $100,000 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetTACOMA ARTS LIVE — $99,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetHopeSparks — $93,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSYMPHONY TACOMA — $92,000 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR TACOMA STUDENTS — $89,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetTacoma Art Museum — $87,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetGREENTRIKE — $84,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetHILLTOP ARTISTS IN RESIDENCE — $78,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetTACOMA OPERA ASSOCIATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES — $75,000 over 6y, 6.2% of budgetASSOCIATED MINISTRIES OF TACOMA-PIERCE COUNTY — $70,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetPuyallup Valley St Francis House — $70,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetPIERCE COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $66,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetNORTHWEST SINFONIETTA INC — $64,000 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetREACH MINISTRIES — $62,000 over 6y, 4.5% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF LAKEWOOD INC — $61,500 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetTacoma Little Theatre and Drama League Inc — $61,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD CLINIC — $61,000 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetMARY BRIDGE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMARA — $60,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetARK INSTITUTE OF LEARNING — $60,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetPIERCE COUNTY CENTER FOR DISPUTE RESOLUT — $60,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetTacoma Urban League — $59,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetDEGREES OF CHANGE — $56,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS WASHINGTON — $55,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetAHAT Homecare — $52,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetMOUNTAIN VIEW COMMUNITY CENTER — $51,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetMEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL — $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOLIVE CREST — $49,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetASHLEY HOUSE — $45,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTacoma Community House — $45,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetRebuilding Together South Sound — $42,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetTACID — $40,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetMuseum of Glass — $40,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetPEACE COMMUNITY CENTER — $40,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetNEW PHOEBE HOUSE — $40,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK OF TACOMA AND PIERCE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds THE RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds PIERCE COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND ↗
  • Who funds Pacific Lutheran University ↗
  • Who funds TACOMA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds R MERLE PALMER MINORITY SCHOLARSHIP ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Nourish Pierce County ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT CARMEL GUILD BEHAVIORAL HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH SOUND OUTREACH SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds YWCA PIERCE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds EMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds SAFE STREETS CAMPAIGN ↗
  • Who funds TACOMA ARTS LIVE ↗
  • Who funds HopeSparks ↗
  • Who funds SYMPHONY TACOMA ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR TACOMA STUDENTS ↗
  • Who funds Tacoma Art Museum ↗
  • Who funds GREENTRIKE ↗
  • Who funds HILLTOP ARTISTS IN RESIDENCE ↗
  • Who funds TACOMA OPERA ASSOCIATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATED MINISTRIES OF TACOMA-PIERCE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Puyallup Valley St Francis House ↗
  • Who funds PIERCE COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST SINFONIETTA INC ↗
  • Who funds REACH MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF LAKEWOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds Tacoma Little Theatre and Drama League Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD CLINIC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kilworth Florence Cha…The Bamford FoundationGreater Tacoma Commun…Heidner Marco J Char …The Norcliffe Foundat…Gary E Milgard Family…Woodworth Family Foun…Forest FoundationPuget Sound Energy Fo…Sequoia FoundationMulticare Health Syst…The Russell Family Fo…
Kilworth Florence Char Tr FndnMN220.2× affinity106 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kilworth Florence Char Tr Fndn · The Bamford Foundation · Greater Tacoma Community Foundation · Heidner Marco J Char Trust · The Norcliffe Foundation · Gary E Milgard Family Foundation- Sunshine · Woodworth Family Foundation · Forest Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Sequoia Foundation · Multicare Health System · The Russell Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Fuchsg & M Fdn Tai funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 14%
  • Medical Teams International — 14% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
79report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 235 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home