Skip to content

· Private foundation

From the Source Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$89k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Human Services$56kScience & Tech$40kFood & Nutrition$39kRecreation & Sports$26kPublic Benefit$22kEducation$17kHealth$250
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $66k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
QLAB ACCELERATOR INC$40,000
UNITED STATES SKI TEAM FOUNDATION$26,000
NEW HAMPSHIRE FOOD BANK$5,000
GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK$5,000
PRIMARY SOURCE$5,000
CRADLES TO CRAYONS$5,000
LEARNING COURAGE$3,000
PAN-MASS CHALLENGE$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $61k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 30% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%THIRD OPTION FOUNDATION: $25k → 6%LEARNING COURAGE: $3k → 5%NEW HAMPSHIRE FOOD BANK: $5k → 7%THIRD OPTION FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%LEARNING COURAGE: $3k → 5%LEARNING COURAGE: $1k → 5%LEARNING COURAGE: $1k → 5%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $5k → 8%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $5k → 8%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$121k · 7 repeat orgs$79k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
2

Total granted

$121k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+54%

Still filing today

86%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $71k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TO
    THIRD OPTION FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2024 · $35k · revenue +1%
  • GB
    GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $20k · revenue +14%
  • CT
    CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $13k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • MC
    MARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP
    one grant, 2024 · $7k
  • GG
    GROWING GARDENS OF BOULDER COUNTYgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +54%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Council On Foreign Relations Inc

The council on foreign relations (cfr) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and…

International
2
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
4
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
5
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
6
Foreign Policy Association Inc

The mission of the foreign policy association today, as it has been for over 100 years, is to serve as a catalyst for developing awareness, understanding, and informed opinion on united states foreign policy and global issues. through its…

International
7
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
8
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
9
Future Problem Solving Program International Inc

Future problem solving proudly celebrates more than 50 years of placing close to a million young people at the core of a dynamic, purposeful learning experience. each year k-12 students from around the world participate in a variety of…

—
10
The Great Books Foundation

The mission of the great books foundation is to advance the critical, reflective thinking, and social and civic engagement of readers of all ages through shared inquiry discussion of works and ideas of enduring value.

—
11
Partners in Food Solutions

Improve the food value chain in developing countries by mobilizing corporate volunteers to share knowledge and expertise with small and growing food processors.

International
12
The Brookings Institution

The brookings institution (brookings) is a nonprofit public policy organization that conducts in-depth, independent research that leads to new ideas for solving problems facing society at the local, national, and global level.…

Social Science
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cradles to Crayons Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Fund for American Studies. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED STATES SKI TEAM FOUNDATION: $26,000 · OtherUNITED STATES SKI TEAM FOUNDATIONPRIMARY SOURCE INC: $22,000 · OtherPRIMARY SOURCE INCGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $20,000 · OtherGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INCCLAREMONT NH FOOD BANK: $13,000 · OtherCLAREMONT NH FOOD BANKTHE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $10,000 · OtherTHE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIESMARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP: $7,000 · OtherMARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP+1 more: $250 · OtherTHIRD OPTION FOUNDATION: $35,000 · Human ServicesTHIRD OPTION FOUNDATIONCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $13,000 · Human ServicesCRADLES TO CRAYONS INCLearning Courage: $8,000 · Human ServicesLearning CourageNew Hampshire Catholic Charities: $5,000 · Human ServicesNew Hampshire Catholic CharitiesQLAB ACCELERATOR INC: $40,000 · InternationalQLAB ACCELERATOR INCGROWING GARDENS OF BOULDER COUNTY: $1,000 · Environment
Other$98,250Human Services$61,000International$40,000Environment$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetQLAB ACCELERATOR INC: $40,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetTHIRD OPTION FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPRIMARY SOURCE INC: $22,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLearning Courage: $8,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetNew Hampshire Catholic Charities: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGROWING GARDENS OF BOULDER COUNTY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization From the Source Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from From the Source Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Primary Source Inc: 23% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to From the Source Foundation?

Find your warmest path to From the Source Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on From the Source’s filings →

More from the funding graph