Skip to content

· Public charity

Froedtert West Bend Hospital Foundation Inc

To advance the health of our communities through excellence and discovery, inspiring each person to live their unique, best life.

$302k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.3MHuman Services$480kYouth Development$190kHousing & Shelter$161k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $250,200, the rows itemized in this filing. The $302,075 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $51,875 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $200k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$27M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LAKESHORE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$50,000
ELEVATE INC$32,000
INTERFAITH CAREGIVERS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY$30,000
FAMILY PROMISE$28,500
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY$25,000
CASA GUADALUPE EDUCATION CENTER$25,000
COMMUNITY SMILES DENTAL$25,000
THE YOUTH AND FAMILY PROJECT INC$23,000
SEED OF HOPE$11,700
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 19% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ELEVATE INC: $32k → 17%ELEVATE INC: $31k → 17%Elevate Inc: $30k → 17%Elevate Inc: $26k → 17%ELEVATE INC: $25k → 17%ELEVATE INC: $20k → 17%Elevate Inc: $20k → 17%Elevate Inc: $15k → 17%Kettle Moraine YMCA Inc: $32k → 6%INTERFAITH CAREGIVERS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $30k → 6%INTERFAITH CAREGIVERS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $25k → 6%INTERFAITH CAREGIVERS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $25k → 6%Youth and Family Project: $25k → 6%INTERFAITH CAREGIVERS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $25k → 6%Kettle Moraine YMCA Inc: $25k → 6%Interfaith Caregivers of Wash: $23k → 6%THE YOUTH AND FAMILY PROJECT INC: $23k → 6%Interfaith Caregivers of Wash: $23k → 6%INTERFAITH CAREGIVERS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $22k → 6%Interfaith Caregivers of Wash: $22k → 6%Youth and Family Project: $21k → 6%Senior Citizens Activities I: $20k → 6%THE YOUTH AND FAMILY PROJECT INC: $20k → 6%Interfaith Caregivers of Wash: $20k → 6%THE YOUTH AND FAMILY PROJECT INC: $17k → 6%THE YOUTH AND FAMILY PROJECT INC: $15k → 6%THE YOUTH AND FAMILY PROJECT INC: $15k → 6%Kettle Moraine YMCA Inc: $15k → 6%FRIENDS INC: $14k → 6%KETTLE MORAINE YMCA: $12k → 6%Friends of Abused Families: $25k → 6%KETTLE MORAINE YMCA: $11k → 6%Friends Inc: $22k → 6%Friends Inc: $16k → 6%Friends of Abused Families: $15k → 6%FRIENDS INC: $10k → 6%FRIENDS INC: $9k → 6%ELEVATE INC: $32k → 6%CASA GUADALUPE EDUCATION CENTER: $40k → 6%CASA GUADALUPE EDUCATION CENTER: $40k → 6%CASA GUADALUPE EDUCATION CENTER: $33k → 6%CASA GUADALUPE EDUCATION CENTER: $25k → 6%Casa Guadalupe Edu Center: $22k → 6%CASA GUADALUPE EDUCATION CENTER: $22k → 6%Casa Guadalupe Edu Center: $19k → 6%Casa Guadalupe Edu Center: $18k → 6%Casa Guadalupe Edu Center: $15k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 11 repeat orgs$102k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
3

Total granted

$2.1M
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+26%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $62k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CASA GUADALUPE EDUCATION CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $234k · revenue +137%
  • EI
    ELEVATE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $231k · revenue +157%
  • IC
    INTERFAITH CAREGIVERS OF WASHINGTON COUN
    9× · 2017–2025 · $215k · revenue +146%

Funded once

  • SC
    SENIOR CITIZENS ACTIVITIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +122%
  • TT
    THE THRESHOLD INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2022 · $12k · revenue +19%
  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS & BIG SISTERS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $8k · revenue +26%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hospice of Washington County Inc

To work together with our interdisciplinary team to provide quality, coordinated, comprehensive patient and family-centered care that addresses the physical, spiritual, emotional and practical needs of our patients. we encourage our…

—
2
Boys & Girls Club of Washington County

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens.

Youth Development
3
Family Promise of Waukesha County Inc

Our mission is to help low-income families and families experiencing homelessness achieve sustainable independence through a community-based response.

Housing & Shelter
4
Wisconsin Family Ties Inc

Wisconsin family ties changes lives by improving children's mental health. it accomplishes this mission through a set of interrelated activities that support and educate parents, and inform practitioners, policy makers and the public about…

—
5
Boys & Girls Club of Washington County Inc

Provide behavioral guidance and promote health, social, educational and vocational development of boys and girls six to eighteen years of age.

Youth Development
6
The Wallace Medical Concern

We partner with our community to make good health possible for all. wallace serves individuals and families who face barriers to care throughout the east multnomah county in the portland metropolitan area.

—
7
Washington Health Care Association

Trade association dedicated to providing educational opportunities, legal and regulatory advice, quality compliance assistance, lobbying and discounted group member benefits for long-term care facilities.

—
8
Family Health Centers

To promote the health of people in north central washington by providing access to health care to persons otherwise excluded from existing health care systems.

Health
9
Waubonsie Mental Health Center

Waubonsie mental health center serves to promote and enhance community mental health values and to provide responsive and accessible mental health services and service coordination to the individuals who reside in fremont, montgomery, and…

Health
10
Mt Washington Childrens Center

Childrens day care center

Human Services
11
Waterfall Clinic Inc

To promote access to quality integrated health services that meet the needs of individuals with barriers to care on the southern oregon coast.

Health
12
Watertown Area Cares Clinic Inc

We strive toward providing improved access to healthcare in the watertown area, with a focus on identifying populations that are in need and the available resources. we will coordinate the compassion and caring of the people of our area to…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Promise of Washington County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Seed of Hope Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CASA GUADALUPE EDUCATION CENTER INC: $234,328 · Human ServicesCASA GUADALUPE EDUCATION CENTER INCELEVATE INC: $231,050 · Human ServicesELEVATE INCINTERFAITH CAREGIVERS OF WASHINGTON COUN: $214,750 · Human ServicesINTERFAITH CAREGIVERS OF WASHINGTON COUNTHE YOUTH AND FAMILY PROJECT INC: $136,000 · Human ServicesTHE YOUTH AND FAMILY PROJECT INCFRIENDS INC: $110,300 · Human ServicesFRIENDS INCKETTLE MORAINE YMCA INC: $93,700 · Human ServicesKETTLE MORAINE YMCA INC+1 more: $20,000 · Human ServicesDR JAMES E ALBRECHT FREE CLINIC INC: $578,600 · OtherDR JAMES E ALBRECHT FREE CLINIC…+2 more: $20,000 · OtherWAUKESHA COUNTY COMMUNITY DENTAL CLINIC INC: $111,644 · HealthWAUKESHA COUNT…NAMI OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC: $96,800 · HealthNAMI OF WASHIN…LAKESHORE COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE INC: $50,000 · HealthLAKESHORE COMM…SEED OF HOPE CENTER INC: $11,700 · HealthTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC: $130,500 · Youth DevelopmentFAMILY PROMISE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC: $121,100 · Housing & Shelter
Human Services$1,040,128Other$598,600Health$270,144Youth Development$130,500Housing & Shelter$121,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDR JAMES E ALBRECHT FREE CLINIC INC: $578,600 over 8y, 68% of budgetCASA GUADALUPE EDUCATION CENTER INC: $234,328 over 9y, 14% of budgetELEVATE INC: $231,050 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetINTERFAITH CAREGIVERS OF WASHINGTON COUN: $214,750 over 9y, 5.5% of budgetTHE YOUTH AND FAMILY PROJECT INC: $136,000 over 7y, 8.0% of budgetTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC: $130,500 over 7y, 3.0% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC: $121,100 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetWAUKESHA COUNTY COMMUNITY DENTAL CLINIC INC: $111,644 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetFRIENDS INC: $110,300 over 7y, 3.4% of budgetNAMI OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC: $96,800 over 4y, 23% of budgetKETTLE MORAINE YMCA INC: $93,700 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetLAKESHORE COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSENIOR CITIZENS ACTIVITIES INC: $20,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetTHE THRESHOLD INCORPORATED: $12,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSEED OF HOPE CENTER INC: $11,700 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetBIG BROTHERS & BIG SISTERS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC: $8,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

West Bend Community Foundation IncWI32.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: West Bend Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Washington County Inc · Oscar & Augusta Schlegel Fdn · Prescott Family Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Otto Bremer Trust · Westbury Bank Charitable Foundation · Melitta S and Joan M Pick Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Froedtert West Bend Hospital Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Froedtert West Bend Hospital Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Froedtert West Bend Hospital’s filings →

    More from the funding graph