Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Friendship House of Milwaukee

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$295k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Housing & Shelter$1.5MHuman Services$484kCrime & Legal$440kYouth Development$129kPhilanthropy$115kReligion$82kHealth$65kFood & Nutrition$63kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $250k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$23M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$125,000
CATHEDRAL CENTER$75,000
LEGAL ACTION OF WISCONSIN$50,000
HOPE STREET MINISTRY INC$30,000
FRANCISCAN PEACEMAKERS$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $130k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 52% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%KINDERHAVEN: $10k → 12%AGAPE HOUSE INC: $8k → 10%THE WOMEN'S CENTER: $5k → 5%JOURNEY HOUSE: $25k → 17%LAKE COUNTRY CARING: $10k → 5%EVANGELICAL CHILD AND FAMILY AGENCY: $40k → 5%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $10k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $10k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $8k → 17%SOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.5M · 20 repeat orgs$405k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +77% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
28

Total granted

$2.5M
$375k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
+25%

Still filing today

75%
68%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyReligionCrime & LegalEducationHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY NORTHWOODS INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $890k · revenue +246% · 35% of their budget
  • CATHEDRAL CENTER INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $455k · revenue +77%
  • LEGAL ACTION OF WISCONSIN INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $225k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue -14%
  • EC
    EVANGELICAL CHILD AND FAMILY AGENCY
    one grant, 2017 · $40k · revenue +14%
  • JOURNEY HOUSE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue -11%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
House of Hope Green Bay Inc

House of hope green bay provides a safe and supportive place where youth and young families with children experiencing homelessness will be come confident, independent, and successful members of our community. house of hope envisions a…

2
Hope Gospel Mission Inc

Hope gospel mission exists to offer christ-centered, life changing help to the homeless and needy in western wisconsin.

Philanthropy
3
Friendship House of Milwaukee
4
Goodwill Industries of South Central Wisconsin Inc

Goodwill of south central wisconsin's mission is to help people in our community to live, work and thrive through housing, employment and supportive services. see schedule o for continuationsupported employment and job skills training are…

Employment
5
Interchange Inc

Provide emergency food assistance to needy individuals in Milwaukee.

Food & Nutrition
6
Life House Inc

Life house works to reconnect homeless and street youth to their dreams with a vision that no youth will be left homeless, alone, uncared for, or fending for themselves on the streets. our comprehensive service model aims to engage and…

Youth Development
7
Hopes Center of Racine Inc

Recognizing the worth and dignity of each person, hopes helps people end their homelessness.

8
Milwaukee Center for Children and Youth Inc

To end suffering of abused children in milwaukee county through comprehensive advocacy, education, and supportive services that heal trauma, build resilience, nurture the ability to thrive, and create a path toward eradicating the epidemic…

Human Services
9
Walker's Point Youth and Family Center Inc

Meet the needs of homeless, vulnerable, and struggling youth and families from our community. through providing services, we empower youth, help them resolve their problems, and strengthen families in order to assist in creating safe and…

Human Services
10
Family Promise of Washington County Inc

Provide resources and services to empower homeless families and individuals of washington county wisconsin.

Housing & Shelter
11
Family Promise of Waukesha County Inc

Our mission is to help low-income families and families experiencing homelessness achieve sustainable independence through a community-based response.

Housing & Shelter
12
Wisconsin Rapids Family Center Inc

Our mission is to empower those affected by domestic violence and sexual assault and address the root causes of abuse in the community through education and advocacy.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Journey House Inc and the most unlike its peers is Habitat for Humanity Northwoods Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyIntegrated Community Suppor…Christian Faith FormationJob Training and Employment…Regional Health SystemsCommunity Grantmaking Found…Youth Development ProgramsFood Pantries & Basic Needs
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr12%6%5–10yr17%9%10–20yr18%34%20–35yr16%29%35–55yr20%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr12%2%5–10yr17%4%10–20yr18%28%20–35yr16%45%35–55yr20%22%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/39
the rest of the field
11%
939/8,265

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/36
Grantees still filing
25/36
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HABITAT FOR HUMANITY NORTHWOODS INC — $890,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY NORTHWOODS INCFRANCISCAN PEACEMAKERS INC — $182,500 · OtherFRANCISCAN PEACEMAKERS INCBENEDICT CENTER INC — $141,000 · OtherBENEDICT CENTER INCSAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN — $86,000 · Other+24 more — $379,600 · Other+24 moreCATHEDRAL CENTER INC — $455,000 · ReligionCATHEDRAL CENTER IN…CITY ON A HILL INC — $46,000 · ReligionCITY ON A HILL INC+1 more — $10,000 · ReligionLEGAL ACTION OF WISCONSIN INC — $225,000 · Crime & LegalLEGAL ACTIO…Exploit No More Inc — $74,000 · Crime & LegalExploit No …UNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC — $50,000 · PhilanthropyGREATER MILWAUKEE FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · PhilanthropyFELLOWSHIP OPEN INC — $20,000 · PhilanthropyNEW BEGINNINGS-A HOME FOR MOTHERS INC — $20,000 · PhilanthropyWOMEN AND GIRLS FUND OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC — $15,000 · PhilanthropyEVANGELICAL CHILD AND FAMILY AGENCY — $40,000 · Human ServicesSOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INC — $32,500 · Human ServicesJOURNEY HOUSE INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesKINDERHAVEN INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesLAKE COUNTRY CARING INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesSTREET ANGELS INC — $7,500 · Human ServicesAGAPE HOUSE INC — $7,500 · Human ServicesTHE WOMEN'S CENTER INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesPearls for Teen Girls Inc — $75,800 · EducationALL-IN MILWAUKEE INC — $35,000 · EducationACTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $54,000 · Housing & ShelterMILWAUKEE COMMUNITY CROSSROADS INC — $5,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,679,100Religion$511,000Crime & Legal$299,000Philanthropy$155,000Human Services$137,500Education$110,800Housing & Shelter$59,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY NORTHWOODS INC — $890,000 over 8y, 35% of budgetCATHEDRAL CENTER INC — $455,000 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetLEGAL ACTION OF WISCONSIN INC — $225,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetFRANCISCAN PEACEMAKERS INC — $182,500 over 9y, 5.9% of budgetBENEDICT CENTER INC — $141,000 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetPearls for Teen Girls Inc — $75,800 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetExploit No More Inc — $74,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetACTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $54,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER MILWAUKEE FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCITY ON A HILL INC — $46,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetHope Center Inc — $45,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetALL-IN MILWAUKEE INC — $35,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSOJOURNER FAMILY PEACE CENTER INC — $32,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE STREET MINISTRY INC — $30,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetJOURNEY HOUSE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMacCANON BROWN HOMELESS SANCTUARY INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY WAREHOUSE INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OPEN INC — $20,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetNEW BEGINNINGS-A HOME FOR MOTHERS INC — $20,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetCARE NET PREGNANCY CENTER OF MILWAUKEE INC — $15,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetHARTLAND AREA FOOD PANTRY INC — $15,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetWOMEN AND GIRLS FUND OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC — $15,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetHUNGER TASK FORCE INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKINDERHAVEN INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetGRAND RAPIDS INITIATIVE FOR LEADERS — $10,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetLAKE COUNTRY CARING INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetSTREET ANGELS INC — $7,500 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetAGAPE HOUSE INC — $7,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetJUST ONE MORE MINISTRY INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S CENTER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSandpoint Area Seniors Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetMILWAUKEE COMMUNITY CROSSROADS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Milwaukee Foundation IncWI42.1× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Joseph and Vera Zilber Family Foundation Inc · Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · The Ros Foundation · Youth Foundation Inc · Ralph Evinrude Foundation Inc · Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Friendship House of Milwaukee funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Friendship House of Milwaukee?

    Find your warmest path to Friendship House of Milwaukee through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph