Skip to content
Friends of Mosdot Goor at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Friends of Mosdot Goor

To advance and support jewish orthodox educational institutions in the united states and israel as well as other countries.

$18M
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$1.6M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$13MHuman Services$706kPhilanthropy$288kArts & Culture$99kInternational$50kYouth Development$48kHousing & Shelter$31kEducation$26kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 16 grants below total $2,479,110, the rows itemized in this filing. The $17,579,182 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $15,100,072 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $173k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $659k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.6M
$33,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$411k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YESHIVAS CHOSEIN YEHOSHUA$1,626,055
THE WAY OF JOY FOUNDATION$246,350
KUPAT RABBI MEIR BAAL HANES INC$225,760
GLOBAL CENTER OF GUR$70,000
CONG HARAV$60,000
FRIENDS OF ARAD INC$57,000
AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY$46,560
FRIENDS OF BAIS YISROEL$33,500
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MOSDOT BET SHEMESH$30,300
BAIS YAAKOV D CHASSIDEI GUR$21,900
CONG BAIS GUR$15,000
CONGREGATION GATES OF MERCY$13,488
CONGREGATION BAIS BERLINER$12,415
FRIENDS OF LENEFESH TIDRESHENU$9,082
CONG NOAM ELIMELECH LIZENSK$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $506k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $50k → 20%NACHZIK CHAZAK: $12k → 20%AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY: $129k → 20%AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY: $65k → 20%AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY: $64k → 20%AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY: $55k → 20%AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY: $47k → 20%AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY: $40k → 20%AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY: $12k → 20%BONEI OLAM: $10k → 20%AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY: $9k → 20%AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY: $7k → 20%A TORAH INFERTILITY MEDIUM OF EXCHANGE: $5k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $15M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Middle East and North Africa$15M · 99% · 96 grants

Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$100k · 1% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$10.0M · 68 repeat orgs$4.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +72% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

68 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 60 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

68
80

Total granted

$10.0M
$2.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+32%

Still filing today

22%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 19% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.9M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MOSDOS BET SHEMESH
    9× · 2017–2025 · $505k · revenue +105%
  • HV
    Hayashar Vehatov Inc
    2× · 2019–2024 · $495k · revenue +746%
  • AY
    AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $429k · revenue +678%

Funded once

  • IM
    ICHUD MOSDOT GUR
    one grant, 2023 · $250k
  • CL
    CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF SOUTHWEST BROWARD INC
    one grant, 2017 · $250k
  • CA
    CONGREGATION AND TALMUD TORAH ZICHRON MENACHEM
    one grant, 2023 · $150k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
3
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
4
Friends of Meor Israel

Education and religious activities and research

Education
5
Friends of Yeshiva Beer Abraham

Furtherance of jewish education

Religion
6
Friends of Yeshiva Tehilas Shlomo Inc

Provide support to further jewish education

Philanthropy
7
American Friends of Yeshivat Nachalat Yossef

The organization will provide financial assistance to educational institutions that promote the observance of the jewish religion, its laws and traditions, and sacred texts, including yeshivat nachalat yossef, located in jerusalem, israel.

Religion
8
American Friends of Birchas Mordechai

Raise funds for charitable purposes

Religion
9
Ohr Avrohom and Moshe Inc

We support religious organizations in the us and israel by providing grants.

Public Benefit
10
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
11
Talmud Torah Tzfat Inc

We make grants to support orthodox jewish education.

Religion
12
Yeshiva Beit Rafael

Religious & charitable- to provide funds to enable the study of torah.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ahavat Yisroel Humanity Inc; the most unlike its peers is Talmudical Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 157 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/40
Grantees still filing
28/40
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GERER YESHIVA AND MESIVTA BAIS YISROEL: $688,676 · OtherGERER YESHIVA AND MESIVTA BAIS YISROELYESHIVA YAGDIL TORAH: $683,365 · OtherYESHIVA YAGDIL TORAHBAIS YAAKOV D CHASSIDEI GUR: $591,849 · OtherBAIS YAAKOV D CHASSIDEI GURTALMUD TORAH DCHASIDEI GUR: $494,853 · OtherTALMUD TORAH DCHASIDEI GURASEI TOV: $444,939 · OtherKEREN LMAAN ARAD: $336,000 · Other+112 more: $5,223,822 · Other+112 moreGLOBAL CENTER OF GUR INC: $3,164,882 · ReligionGLOBAL CENTER OF GUR INCYESHIVAS CHOSEIN YEHOSHUA: $1,626,055 · ReligionYESHIVAS CHOSEIN YEHOSHUAHayashar Vehatov Inc: $495,000 · ReligionHayashar Vehatov Inc+16 more: $1,309,596 · Religion+16 moreAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MOSDOS BET SHEMESH: $505,031 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN …THE WAY OF JOY FOUNDATION: $465,150 · PhilanthropyTHE WAY O…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SFATH EMETH YESHIVA: $238,750 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN …LIHATZILUM INC: $203,125 · PhilanthropyLIHATZILU…+4 more: $92,032 · Philanthropy+4 moreAHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC: $429,072 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $50,000 · Human Services+3 more: $26,500 · Human ServicesFriends of Rachashei Lev Whispers of The Heart: $33,817 · EducationTORAS IMECHA INC: $15,000 · EducationTALMUDIC RESEARCH CENTER OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY: $12,940 · EducationQUEENS YESHIVA KETANA INC: $10,650 · EducationYESHIVA NESIVOS HATORAH INC: $8,000 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBRON YESHIVA IN JERUSALEM INC: $50,000 · InternationalPROJECT REFUAH INC: $22,650 · International
Other$8,463,504Religion$6,595,533Philanthropy$1,504,088Human Services$505,572Education$80,407International$72,650

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGLOBAL CENTER OF GUR INC: $3,164,882 over 9y, 54% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MOSDOS BET SHEMESH: $505,031 over 9y, 16% of budgetHayashar Vehatov Inc: $495,000 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetAHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC: $429,072 over 9y, 3.5% of budgetLIHATZILUM INC: $203,125 over 2y, 20% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA IMREI EMES I: $186,624 over 8y, 8.8% of budgetKUPATH RAMBAHN KOLEL POLIN: $165,552 over 4y, 5.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF RE'AIM MESAMCHEI HASHABBOS: $160,000 over 3y, 23% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF TIFERET MOSHE BETZALEL INC: $140,414 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF YESHIVA SIFSEI TZADIK: $137,691 over 6y, 13% of budgetJEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL INC: $128,000 over 2y, 69% of budgetFRIENDS OF BAIS YISROEL: $108,500 over 6y, 11% of budgetZECHER AVROHOM INC: $86,092 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetYESHIVA MAMAR MORDECHAI NADVORNA: $59,300 over 3y, 7.1% of budgetSHIRAT DAVID INC: $50,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBRON YESHIVA IN JERUSALEM INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMIFAL CHESED FOUNDATION INC: $39,500 over 2y, 10% of budgetFriends of Rachashei Lev Whispers of The Heart: $33,817 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetYASIS INC: $33,450 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HALICHOT HA'ARETZ: $24,223 over 1y, 9.7% of budgetMORASHA VADAAT MENUCHAT OLAMIM INC: $21,200 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetTORAS IMECHA INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTALMUDIC RESEARCH CENTER OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY: $12,940 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNACHZIK CHAZAK INC: $11,500 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetQUEENS YESHIVA KETANA INC: $10,650 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTALMUDICAL ACADEMY: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD HOPE INC: $9,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetYESHIVA NESIVOS HATORAH INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS YESHIVA REISHIT CHOCHMA: $8,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLEV BEREL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GLOBAL CENTER OF GUR INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAS CHOSEIN YEHOSHUA ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MOSDOS BET SHEMESH ↗
  • Who funds Hayashar Vehatov Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE WAY OF JOY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SFATH EMETH YESHIVA ↗
  • Who funds LIHATZILUM INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA IMREI EMES I ↗
  • Who funds KUPATH RAMBAHN KOLEL POLIN ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF RE'AIM MESAMCHEI HASHABBOS ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TIFERET MOSHE BETZALEL INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF YESHIVA SIFSEI TZADIK ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF BAIS YISROEL ↗
  • Who funds ZECHER AVROHOM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundChaim Maleh FoundationWestlawn FoundationBirchas Mordechai Cha…Zecher Avrohom IncEastlawn FoundationPark Charitable TrustGlobal Center of Gur …The Kagan Family Foun…Ahavat Yisroel Humani…The Fishoff Family Fo…Lart Charitable Trust
The Ojc FundNY87.7× affinity104 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Chaim Maleh Foundation · Westlawn Foundation · Birchas Mordechai Charitable Foundation · Zecher Avrohom Inc · Eastlawn Foundation · Park Charitable Trust · Global Center of Gur Inc · The Kagan Family Foundation Inc · Ahavat Yisroel Humanity Inc · The Fishoff Family Foundation · Lart Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Friends of Mosdot Goor funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Friends of Mosdot Goor. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Toras Imecha Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Nesivos Hatorah Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Friends of Mosdot Goor?

Find your warmest path to Friends of Mosdot Goor through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 157 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Friends of Mosdot Goor’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home