Skip to content

· Public charity

Friends Council on Education

The mission of the FRIENDS COUNCIL ON EDUCATION is to provide leadership in drawing friends schools together in unity of spirit and cooperative endeavors.

$277k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.4M
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $154,020, the rows itemized in this filing. The $276,790 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $122,770 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $119k
$12,600
Median grant
4
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WESTTOWN SCHOOL$35,995
FRIENDS CENTRAL SCHOOL$17,325
FRIENDS SELECT SCHOOL$17,210
WILMINGTON FRIENDS SCHOOL$12,600
ABINGTON FRIENDS SCHOOL$12,600
GERMANTOWN FRIENDS SCHOOL$12,600
GEORGE SCHOOL$11,025
FRIENDS SCHOOL MULLICA HILL$9,450
NEWTOWN FRIENDS SCHOOL$7,875
BUCKINGHAM FRIENDS SCHOOL$6,300
SANDY SPRING FRIENDS SCHOOL$5,840
STRATFORD FRIENDS SCHOOL$5,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 40% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WILMINGTON FRIENDS SCHOOL: $17k → 10%ABINGTON FRIENDS SCHOOL: $14k → 7%FRIENDS SELECT SCHOOL: $26k → 22%RATIONAL PARTNERS: $60k → 17%BROOKLYN FRIENDS SCHOOL: $25k → 20%WILMINGTON FRIENDS SCHOOL: $16k → 10%ABINGTON FRIENDS SCHOOL: $14k → 7%FRIENDS SELECT SCHOOL: $24k → 22%RATIONAL PARTNERS: $40k → 17%WILMINGTON FRIENDS SCHOOL: $16k → 10%ABINGTON FRIENDS SCHOOL: $14k → 7%FRIENDS SELECT SCHOOL: $23k → 22%WILMINGTON FRIENDS SCHOOL: $13k → 10%ABINGTON FRIENDS SCHOOL: $13k → 7%FRIENDS SELECT SCHOOL: $22k → 22%WILMINGTON FRIENDS SCHOOL: $13k → 10%ABINGTON FRIENDS SCHOOL: $13k → 7%FRIENDS SELECT SCHOOL: $21k → 22%WILMINGTON FRIENDS SCHOOL: $12k → 10%GEORGE SCHOOL: $33k → 6%FRIENDS SELECT SCHOOL: $21k → 22%WESTTOWN SCHOOL: $37k → 6%GEORGE SCHOOL: $29k → 6%FRIENDS SELECT SCHOOL: $17k → 22%WESTTOWN SCHOOL: $36k → 6%GEORGE SCHOOL: $25k → 6%FRIENDS SELECT SCHOOL: $21k → 22%WESTTOWN SCHOOL: $32k → 6%GEORGE SCHOOL: $21k → 6%FRIENDS CENTRAL SCHOOL: $17k → 7%GERMANTOWN FRIENDS SCHOOL: $14k → 22%WESTTOWN SCHOOL: $29k → 6%GEORGE SCHOOL: $21k → 6%FRIENDS CENTRAL SCHOOL: $17k → 7%GERMANTOWN FRIENDS SCHOOL: $13k → 22%WESTTOWN SCHOOL: $29k → 6%GEORGE SCHOOL: $19k → 6%FRIENDS' CENTRAL SCHOOL: $16k → 7%GERMANTOWN FRIENDS SCHOOL: $13k → 22%WESTTOWN SCHOOL: $28k → 6%GEORGE SCHOOL: $18k → 6%FRIENDS' CENTRAL SCHOOL: $13k → 7%GERMANTOWN FRIENDS SCHOOL: $13k → 22%WESTTOWN SCHOOL: $27k → 6%GEORGE SCHOOL: $13k → 6%GERMANTOWN FRIENDS SCHOOL: $12k → 22%WESTTOWN SCHOOL: $21k → 6%WESTTOWN SCHOOL: $19k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 16 repeat orgs$71k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +13% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
7

Total granted

$1.4M
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+12%

Still filing today

19%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    ABINGTON FRIENDS SCHOOL
    8× · 2017–2025 · $94k · revenue +35%
  • WP
    WILLIAM PENN CHARTER SCHOOL INC
    4× · 2017–2021 · $26k · revenue +13%
  • FS
    FRIENDS SCHOOL CORPORATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $17k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • BF
    BROOKLYN FRIENDS SCHOOL
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • PF
    PRINCETON FRIENDS SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $7k · revenue -1%
  • PY
    PHILADELPHIA YEARLY MEETING OF FRIENDS
    one grant, 2018 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/6
Grantees still filing
5/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WESTTOWN SCHOOL: $257,594 · OtherWESTTOWN SCHOOLGEORGE SCHOOL: $190,620 · OtherGEORGE SCHOOLWILMINGTON FRIENDS SCHOOL INC: $113,822 · OtherWILMINGTON FRIENDS SCHOOL INCRATIONAL PARTNERS: $100,000 · OtherRATIONAL PARTNERSFRIENDS CENTRAL SCHOOL: $95,760 · OtherFRIENDS CENTRAL SCHOOLGERMANTOWN FRIENDS SCHOOL: $88,684 · OtherGERMANTOWN FRIENDS SCHOOLMOORESTOWN FRIENDS SCHOOL: $57,583 · OtherPHILADELPHIA YEARLY MEETING OF FRIENDS: $39,620 · Other+12 more: $177,101 · Other+12 moreFRIENDS SELECT SCHOOL: $174,710 · EducationFRIENDS SELECT SCHOOLABINGTON FRIENDS SCHOOL: $94,205 · EducationABINGTON FRIENDS SCHOOLWILLIAM PENN CHARTER SCHOOL INC: $25,907 · EducationWILLIAM PENN CHARTER SCH…+2 more: $12,280 · Education
Other$1,120,784Education$307,102

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDS SELECT SCHOOL: $174,710 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetABINGTON FRIENDS SCHOOL: $94,205 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetWILLIAM PENN CHARTER SCHOOL INC: $25,907 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS SCHOOL CORPORATION: $16,600 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPRINCETON FRIENDS SCHOOL: $7,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRICHMOND FRIENDS SCHOOL INC: $5,280 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS SELECT SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds ABINGTON FRIENDS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM PENN CHARTER SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS SCHOOL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds PRINCETON FRIENDS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds RICHMOND FRIENDS SCHOOL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

T Wistar Brown Teacher's FundPA32.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: T Wistar Brown Teacher's Fund · Business Leadership Organized for Catholic Schools · Central Pennsylvania Scholarship Fund · Friends Fiduciary Corporation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Philadelphia Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · Aetna Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Friends Council on Education funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Friends Council on Education. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Friends Council on Education’s filings →

    More from the funding graph