How much did Friend to Friend Inc grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 65% of Friend to Friend Inc’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2022

grantmaking

2023

grantmaking

2024

educational

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k15 grants · $66k
$10k–50k5 grants · $73k

$5,000

Median grant

States reached

$3.8M

Total assets

Largest grants

Alpine School District Foundation$30,000
Washington County School District Foundation$13,000
Be a Little Too Kind$10,000
The Center for Women & Children$10,000
Ohana Beginnings$10,000
Junior Achievement of Utah$7,500
Millard School District Foundation$5,000
Murray Education Foundation$5,000
Salt Lake Education Foundation$5,000
Provo School District Foundation$5,000
Canyons School District Foundation$5,000
South Sanpete School District Foundation$5,000
Emery County School District Foundation$5,000
Davis Education Foundation$5,000
Nebo Education Foundation$5,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9% — the area typically sits at 7%. 91% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$304k · 15 repeat orgs$130k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +111% since the first grant, against +105% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$304k

$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+111%

+105%

Still filing today

33%

50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $81k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationPhilanthropyHealthInternationalArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

DE
Davis Education Foundation
3× · 2022–2024 · $38k · revenue +111%
ME
Murray Education Foundation
3× · 2022–2024 · $35k · revenue +231%
JA
Junior Achievement of Utah
2× · 2023–2024 · $15k · revenue +54%

Funded once

RM
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIESgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +105%
UV
UTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +48%
SM
SHROPSHIRE MUSIC FOUNDATION
one grant, 2022 · $8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Weber County School District

The mission of the Weber School Foundation is to raise and provide funds to enhance educational goals and opportunities for students.

Education

Canyons School District Education

Canyons School District Education Foundation works in tandem with community and business partners to build support for public schools and to advance Canyons School Districts mission to help every student become college- and career-ready…

Education

San Juan Foundation

Provide education improvement and opportunities for underserved people in San Juan County, Utah

—

San Juan County School District Foundation

Provide academic growth to students of San Juan County Utah School District by promoting, sponsoring and carrying out educational, scientific, charitable and related activities and objectives with the San Juan County School District.

Education

Springdale Public Schools Education Foundation

To provide scholarships to Springdale students and grants to teachers.

Education

West Valley Education Foundation

Enhance education opportunities for students.

Education

Millcreek Education Foundation

To provide scholarships to students and to provide funds for enhancement and capital improvements to school programs and school facilities for Millcreek Township School District

—

Education Foundation of Canyon Isd

To generate and distribute resources to provide enhancements for excellence in education to Canyon ISD, its students and staff.

Education

Durango Education Foundation

To provide financial support to the Durango School District 9-R for programs, materials and technology need that fall outside the capacity of the regular school district.

Education

Tooele County School District

To support the Tooele School District in education, literacy, and charitable purposes.

Education

South Summit Education Foundation

To provide assistance in education and related programs for students in the South Summit School District.

Education

Mormon Scholars Foundation

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Salt Lake Education Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Shropshire Music Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

14/14

Grantees still filing

12/14

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$284,000Education$105,000International$15,000Philanthropy$15,000Health$10,000Arts & Culture$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ihc Health Services IncUT20.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ihc Health Services Inc · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · C Scott & Dorothy E Watkins · Beesley Family Foundation · Fidelity Foundation · The Call Foundation · The Ashton Family Foundation · Kennecott Utah Copper Visitors Center Charitable Foundation · Intermountain Community Care · doTERRA Healing Hands Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · Enterprise Holdings Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation Friend to Friend Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Emery County School District Foundation.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~25 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 6 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 5.7× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 202522880 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Emery County School District Foundation, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 25 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 34% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Friend to Friend Inc?

Find your warmest path to Friend to Friend Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

Friend to Friend Inc

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Friend to Friend Inc?

More from the funding graph

Friend to Friend Inc

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Friend to Friend Inc?

More from the funding graph