Skip to content
Freedom for All Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Freedom for All Inc

Freedom for all (ffa) and our on the ground partners rescue, shelter, rehabilitate and reintegrate survivors of human trafficking.

$514k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$63k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$84kCrime & Legal$83kHousing & Shelter$77kInternational$59kArts & Culture$10kHealth$10kPhilanthropy$10k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $108,886, the rows itemized in this filing. The $513,859 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $404,973 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $46k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $63k
$23,980
Median grant
3
States reached
$293k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LOVE146$62,606
MENTARI HUMAN TRAFFICKING SURVIVOR EMPOWERMENT PROGRAM INCORPORATED$23,980
VOICES FOR FREEDOM$12,300
TRANSPARENTEM$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $84k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%MENTARI HUMAN TRAFFICKING SURVIVOR EMPOWERMENT PROGRAM INCORPORATED: $24k → 13%TRANSPARENTEM: $10k → 20%MENTARI HUMAN TRAFFICKING SURVIVOR EMPOWERMENT PROGRAM INCORPORATED: $20k → 13%TRANSPARENTEM: $10k → 20%TRANSPARENTEM: $10k → 20%TRANSPARENTEM: $10k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $405k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 4 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

East Asia and the Pacific$172k · 42% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: SUPPORT SHELTER AND VOCATIONAL PROGRAMMING

Sub-Saharan Africa$113k · 28% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: SUPPORT SHELTER AND RESCUE MISSIONS

South Asia$110k · 27% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: SUPPORT EDUCATION PROGRAMS AND CERTIFICATES OF FREEDOM

South America$10k · 2% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: SUPPORT LABOR RIGHTS

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$230k · 4 repeat orgs$103k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +91% since the first grant, against +49% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
4

Total granted

$230k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+91%
+49%

Still filing today

75%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $63k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalCrime & LegalHealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • V4
    VOICES 4 FREEDOM
    4× · 2020–2024 · $49k · revenue +361%
  • TL
    TRANSPARENTEM LTD
    4× · 2020–2024 · $40k · revenue +91%
  • TH
    THE HUMAN TRAFFICKING INSTITUTE
    2× · 2020–2021 · $20k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • PP
    POLARIS PROJECT
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +24%
  • GIRLS EDUCATIONAL AND MENTORING SERVICES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +60%
  • TF
    THE FREEDOM FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Coalition Against Trafficking in Women

The mission of the organization is to end the trafficking and sexual exploitation of women and girls worldwide. it promotes the human rights of women and girls by working internationally to combat commercial sexual exploitation in all its…

International
2
Justice Ventures International

Jvis mission is to bring freedom, justice, and restoration to men, women, and children suffering from human trafficking and other extreme injustice by partnering with local organizations and global stakeholders.

International
3
California Human Trafficking Investigators and Prosecuters Asso
Crime & Legal
4
Prevention Now Inc

Prevention now leverages data and technology to stop human trafficking before it starts.

Human Services
5
Love Justice International

The mission of love justice international is driving the downfall of slavery by disrupting human trafficking in transit.

International
6
Not Abandoned

To prevent sex slavery by changing the world view of affected communities and to liberate those already enslaved by providing safe environments for healing, and business opportunities that lead to full and transformed lives.

Crime & Legal
7
True Justice International Inc

To exeucte true justice on a global scale in order to promote the restoration of humanity with mercy and compassion through strategic initiatives that focus on the

Human Services
8
Justice Without Borders

To create transnational access to legal assistance for victims of labour exploitation and human trafficking so that they can seek rightful compensation, even after returning home.

International
9
The Freedom Collective Inc

To glorify god by bringing hope to victims of sexual exploitation, empowering them to live free, and ultimately abolishing sex trafficking.

Housing & Shelter
10
Our Rescue

Our rescue works collaboratively with law enforcement agencies worldwide to identify, arrest, and prosecute traffickers. we provide compassionate care for our survivors, beginning with crisis relief and ending months or years later with…

Arts & Culture
11
The Invictus Project

Combat the trafficking and sexual exploitation of children

Recreation & Sports
12
Free the Slaves

To end slavery and human trafficking around the world

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Voices 4 Freedom; the most unlike its peers is Mentari Human Trafficking Survior. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MENTARI HUMAN TRAFFICKING SURVIOR: $121,077 · Human ServicesMENTARI HUMAN TRAFFICKING SURVIORTRANSPARENTEM LTD: $40,000 · Human ServicesTRANSPARENTEM LTDLOVE146 INC: $62,606 · Crime & LegalLOVE146 INCTHE HUMAN TRAFFICKING INSTITUTE: $20,000 · Crime & LegalTHE HUMAN TRAFFICKING INSTIT…VOICES 4 FREEDOM: $49,180 · InternationalVOICES 4 FREEDOMPOLARIS PROJECT: $10,000 · InternationalPOLARIS PROJECTGIRLS EDUCATIONAL AND MENTORING SERVICES INC: $10,000 · HealthTHE FREEDOM FUND: $10,000 · PhilanthropyVERITE INC: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Human Services$161,077Crime & Legal$82,606International$59,180Health$10,000Philanthropy$10,000Arts & Culture$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMENTARI HUMAN TRAFFICKING SURVIOR: $121,077 over 3y, 100% of budgetLOVE146 INC: $62,606 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetVOICES 4 FREEDOM: $49,180 over 4y, 4.7% of budgetTRANSPARENTEM LTD: $40,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetTHE HUMAN TRAFFICKING INSTITUTE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPOLARIS PROJECT: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGIRLS EDUCATIONAL AND MENTORING SERVICES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE FREEDOM FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVERITE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA10.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Freedom for All Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Freedom for All Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 49%
  • LOVE146 Inc: 49% of income from government
  • Verite Inc: 19% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Freedom for All Inc?

Find your warmest path to Freedom for All Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Freedom for All’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home