· Public charity
Freed People
Freed People ignites hope by redeeming destinies and restoring families.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 12 grants below total $303,075 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $550,634 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $247,559 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $32k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $108k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $163k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Texas Counter-Trafficking Initiative | $86,375 |
| 4theONE Foundation | $77,000 |
| Rescue Hill | $28,000 |
| Milestone Ranch | $23,000 |
| Heaven's Army of Resources & Recreation Center | $20,500 |
| The Fountains Fellowship Counseling Center | $15,200 |
| ReInspire | $11,500 |
| Refuge City | $10,000 |
| Rescue Her | $9,500 |
| No Trafficking Zone | $8,500 |
| Different Day Foundation | $8,000 |
| Traffick911 | $5,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $452k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $58k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TCTexas Counter-Trafficking Initiative3× · 2023–2025 · $228k · revenue -32% · 84% of their budget
- 4F4THEONE FOUNDATION3× · 2023–2025 · $216k · 77% of their budget
- HAHeavens Army of Resources & Recreation Center3× · 2023–2025 · $109k
Funded once
- SCStill Creek Boys Ranch Incone grant, 2024 · $175k · revenue 0%
- RHRestored Hope Ministries Incone grant, 2024 · $8k · revenue 0%
- HCHollow Creek Treatment Centerone grant, 2023 · $6k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Restoring our youth by turning trauma into triumph for female suvivors of child sex trafficking in Georgia.
The bridge 2 home is a safe and loving home for young girls and young women who were victimized by sex trafficking. at the bridge they can find healing and growth and can experience the love of a perfect heavenly father who pursues them.
501 (c)(3) public charity
Rahab House is deeply committed to the rescue, refuge, and restoration of human trafficking survivors. We provide comprehensive support that encompasses immediate safety and connections to long-term restorative care in alignment with the…
We exist to serve women who have been trafficked. through our confidential services, we offer a safe space for healing to begin while we compassionately reflect jesus to all we encounter.
Our mission is to rebuild dignity in the lives of those we serve.
To Serve communities and disrupt human trafficking with the use of modern technology, at every stage, from stopping demand to prevention, rescue and rehabilitation.
Sojourn House exists to defend, restore, and liberate women who have been trafficked or exploited.
Offer hope for a new life to young women and girls involved in domestic minor sex trafficking in the south king county area.
Human trafficking prevention and support services for victims.
We provide support to survivors of sexual assault, domestic violence, child sexual abuse, and incest.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Refuge City and the most unlike its peers is Different Day Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Texas Counter-Trafficking Initiative ↗
- Who funds 4THEONE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Still Creek Boys Ranch Inc ↗
- Who funds Heavens Army of Resources & Recreation Center ↗
- Who funds Milestone Ranch ↗
- Who funds Traffick911 ↗
- Who funds Rescue Hill Nazarene Compassionate Ministry Center ↗
- Who funds RESCUE HER INC ↗
- Who funds DIFFERENT DAY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Reinspire ↗
- Who funds REFUGE CITY ↗
- Who funds Restored Hope Ministries Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Freed People funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Freed People?
Find your warmest path to Freed People through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.