Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Free the Oppressed

To bring help hope and love to people of all faiths and ethnicities in the conflict areas to shine a light on the actions of oppressors to stand with the oppressed and support leaders and organizations committed to liberty justice and service.

$187k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212024.

Religion$118kHuman Services$73kInternational$60kPublic Safety & Disaster$39k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 4 grants below total $121,530 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $187,153 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $65,623 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $22k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$9,530
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Deidox Films Inc$100,000
East-West$9,530
The Fund for Liberty and Justice$7,000
Bonus Years Inc$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Evac Inc: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Grants abroad, by region — $66k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 3 regions, $20k to organizations and $45k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Middle East and North Africa$53k · 81% · 1 grant · 66 people

Stated purpose: To support health, orphanage, and churches in the Middle East · Various cash grants given to individuals for assistance with food medical transportation or other survival need.

East Asia and the Pacific$10k · 15% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: To support missionaries in Tajikistan

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$2k · 4% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: To support missionary in Ukraine

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Operation Mordechai Inc
International
2
Airbridge Releief

AIRBRIDGE RELIEF plays a vital role in helping refugees and people in war-torn areas through planning, coordination and execution on the delivery and support of humanitarian aid. Our support and work involves helping in three major ways:…

Public Safety & Disaster
3
Project Dynamo Inc

To deploy personnel and resources to global flashpoints where the us government has little to no formal diplomatic and military presence, either refused to conduct evacuations of us persons, allies, or vulnerable populations or where those…

International
4
Bridge to Baladi Corp

Charitable Donation to refugees

Human Services
5
Onerefugee
Education
6
Lift Up Ukraine

Lift Up Ukraine is a completely volunteer-based organization. In response to the deplorable human tragedy created by Russia's invasion, the mission is to help provide survival supplies & support to Ukraine's civilian defenders and…

International
7
Samaritan Air Inc

Emergency air transport

Human Services
8
West Support Inc

WEST SUPPORT INC is a 501(c)(3) public charity dedicated to human rights advocacy and the documentation of war crimes and crimes against humanity in conflict zones. The organization provides direct humanitarian assistance to victims of…

Health
9
Helping Hands Ministries

To support missionary work and helping needy

Religion
10
Emite Inc

Support of Humanitarian Relief

Human Services
11
Sunergos International

Serve orphans, elderly, refugees and the poor.

Human Services
12
Project Doxa Inc

We support Christian missionaries and help with humanitarian aid and relief around the globe.

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Novi Community and the most unlike its peers is Bonus Years Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/9
Grantees still filing
1/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DEIDOX FILMS INC — $100,000 · EnvironmentDEIDOX FILMS INCBonus Years Inc — $63,408 · Human ServicesBonus Years IncEVAC INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesEVAC INCSHAI FUND INC — $50,000 · InternationalSHAI FUND INCNOVI COMMUNITY — $10,000 · InternationalNOVI COMMUNITYPlan B ARC INC — $20,000 · Public Safety & DisasterPlan B ARC INCTHE FUND FOR LIBERTY AND JUSTICE INC — $19,000 · Public Safety & DisasterTHE FUND FOR LI…East-West Ministries International — $9,530 · ReligionLIVING WATER PRODUCTIONS — $8,000 · Religion
Environment$100,000Human Services$73,408International$60,000Public Safety & Disaster$39,000Religion$17,530

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDEIDOX FILMS INC — $100,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetBonus Years Inc — $63,408 over 3y, 5.8% of budgetSHAI FUND INC — $50,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetPlan B ARC INC — $20,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetTHE FUND FOR LIBERTY AND JUSTICE INC — $19,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetNOVI COMMUNITY — $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetLIVING WATER PRODUCTIONS — $8,000 over 1y, 9.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA8.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Free the Oppressed funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
2021222324
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Free the Oppressed?

    Find your warmest path to Free the Oppressed through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph