· Private foundation
Fred V & Dorothy H Heinkel Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 45% of FRED V & DOROTHY H HEINKEL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COLUMBIA COLLEGE | $20,000 |
| WOODHAVEN | $20,000 |
| BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA | $17,500 |
| STEPHENS COLLEGE | $17,000 |
| CALLAWAY COUNTY EXTENDED EMPLOYMENT FOUNDATION | $15,928 |
| SENIOR SERVICES OF BOONE CO INC | $15,000 |
| GREAT CIRCLE BOYS & GIRLS TOWN | $15,000 |
| COYOTE HILL | $15,000 |
| IMPACT ACTIVITY CENTER SUMMER SCHOOL RENOVATION | $10,000 |
| JOB POINT | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $200k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
21 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $58k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCColumbia Center for Urban Agriculture3× · 2017–2019 · $75k · revenue +354%
- VAVOLUNTARY ACTION CENTER4× · 2019–2024 · $60k · revenue +529%
- JPJOB POINT4× · 2020–2025 · $58k · revenue +39%
Funded once
- GRGREAT RIVERS COUNCILone grant, 2023 · $40k
- FOFRIENDS OF CENTRAL MO FISHER HOUSEone grant, 2020 · $30k
- RMRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF MID MISSOURI INCone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -21%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The heart of missouri united way works in improve lives of people in need by mobilizing and coordinating the caring power of community resources in mid-missouri.
The mission of the columbia county community healthcare consortium, inc. is improving access to healthcare and supporting the health and well-being of people in our rural community.
Our Mission is to solve homelessness as we know it by establishing a pathway for our unhoused neighbors to a home with dignity.
The Gibson Center for Behavorial Change is committed to providing comprehensive services which promote new behaviors for a healthy lifestyle.
The Crisis Center of Russell County was organized to provide assistance and temporary housing to victims of domestic abuse through secured temporary housing and education with job placement to transition them back into society. In…
The mission of the community clinic of southwest missouri is to improve the health of people in our community without access to medical, dental, or mental health care.
Provide services, food commodities, utility payment funds, cancer treatment funds to low-income residents of the carroll county, missouri area.
Heart of missouri casa is an organization of volunteer advocates who stand up for abused and neglected children in court to help them find a safe and permanent home.
The Crisis Center provides shelter and services to victims and their children of domestic and sexual violence.
The Welcome House is a non-profit, sober living, recovery program (incorporated in 1971) with the sole purpose of educating and rehabilitating the adult male alcoholic/ addict and the expressed mission of returning the individual to…
ReHope empowers and elevates survivors of human trafficking and sexual exploitation through its faith-based, trauma-informed residence and recovery programs.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Cerebral Palsy Heartland and the most unlike its peers is Central Missouri Diabetic Childrens Camp Camp Hickory Hill. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 30. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Columbia Center for Urban Agriculture ↗
- Who funds COLUMBIA COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTARY ACTION CENTER ↗
- Who funds JOB POINT ↗
- Who funds BOONE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY BUILDERS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CO ↗
- Who funds STEPHENS COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Coyote Hill Foster Care Ministries ↗
- Who funds Love Columbia Corp Love Columbia ↗
- Who funds IN2ACTION ↗
- Who funds ARROW ROCK LYCEUM THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds AUDRAIN COUNTY SHELTER RESOURCE COALITION ↗
- Who funds CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT EMERGENCY SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds GREAT CIRCLE ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF MID MISSOURI INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE COLUMBIA AREA ↗
- Who funds THE HELP CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds COMO MOBILE AID COLLECTIVE ↗
- Who funds Great Rivers Council - Boy Scouts of America ↗
- Who funds Do Something Right Now Inc ↗
- Who funds THE FOOD BANK FOR CENTRAL & NORTHEAST MISSOURI ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF THE MISSOURI HEARTLAND INC ↗
- Who funds Spectrum Health Care ↗
- Who funds MISSOURI COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds WELCOME HOME INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Stafford Family Charitable Trust · Veterans United Foundation · Boone Electric Community Trust · Allen P and Josephine B Green · Orscheln Industries Foundation Inc · Boone County Community Trust · Heart of Missouri United Way Inc · Mfa Oil Foundation · Griffin Family Foundation Inc · Psalm 103 Family Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Hagan Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Fred V & Dorothy H Heinkel Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Fred V & Dorothy H Heinkel Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Fred V & Dorothy H Heinkel Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.