· Private foundation
Fred L Phillips Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k14 grants · $46k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $36k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE BETTY AND LEONARD PHILLIPS DEAF ACTION CENTER OF LOUISIANA | $35,795 |
| LOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC | $9,833 |
| MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION MISSISSIPPI | $6,500 |
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY | $5,000 |
| CHILDREN'S OF MISSISSIPPI | $5,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $3,500 |
| PAGOSA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT | $2,500 |
| PILOTS FOR PATIENTS | $2,500 |
| LSU HEALTH SCIENCES FOUNDATION SHREVEPORT | $2,500 |
| GRAWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH | $2,500 |
| PHOENIX SOCIETY FOR BURN VICTIMS | $2,000 |
| HUMANE SOCIETY OF PAGOSA SPRINGS | $1,500 |
| LOUISIANA STATE FIREMEN'S ASSOCIATION | $1,000 |
| THE ARC CADDO-BOSSIER | $1,000 |
| B'NAI ZION FOUNDATION | $250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
16 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches3× · 2023–2025 · $10k · revenue +22%
- PFPILOTS FOR PATIENTS2× · 2024–2025 · $5k · revenue +43%
- HSHUMANE SOCIETY OF PAGOSA SPRINGS3× · 2023–2025 · $4k · revenue +1%
Funded once
- VOVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA INCone grant, 2021 · $5k
- ACAEROSPACE CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE INCone grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -38%
- CRCORNEA RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +30%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
All functions of the foundation are dedicated to supporting lsu health sciences center at shreveport.
No board approved mission statement
The mission of the foundation is to inspire donors to invest in the lsu health sciences center - new orleans ("hsc-no") and its future, to properly steward those contributions, and to help meet the ever evolving needs of the lsuhsc-no by…
No board approved mission statement
To provide high quality care and set the standards of excellence for those we serve.
The patient-centered healthcare team of the lsu healthcare network will provide the highest quality, comprehensive medical care with compassion and professionalism, while maintaining our commitment to academic excellence
We champion children by making them better today and healthier tomorrow.continued on schedule o.arkansas children's will fundamentally transform healthcare delivery for the children of arkansas and beyond. arkansas children's core values…
We serve, heal, lead, educate and innovate. ochsner will be a global medical and academic leader who will save and change lives. we will shape the future of healthcare through our integrated health system, fueled by the passion and…
To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.
Christus health foundation of southeast texas serves the philanthropic needs of christus health southeast texas by soliciting and distributing contributions in support of christus health southeast texas.
The primary purpose of christus foundation shreveport-bossier is to promote philanthropy and charitable giving to provide resources to enhance the ability of christus health northern louisiana in its mission of extending the healing…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Arc Caddo-Bossier and the most unlike its peers is The Cross Lake Floatilla. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds LSU HEALTH SCIENCES FOUNDATION IN SHREVEPORT ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY INC ↗
- Who funds AEROSPACE CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE INC ↗
- Who funds PILOTS FOR PATIENTS ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF PAGOSA SPRINGS ↗
- Who funds CORNEA RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds MISSISSIPPI CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds AUTISM SPEAKS INC ↗
- Who funds THE ARC CADDO-BOSSIER ↗
- Who funds LOUISIANA STATE FIREMENS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE CROSS LAKE FLOATILLA ↗
- Who funds Texas Children's Hospital ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Willis-Knighton Medical Center · Community Foundation of North Louisiana · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Fred L Phillips Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Fred L Phillips Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Fred L Phillips Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.