Skip to content

· Private foundation

Fred Forsyth Educational Fd

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$38k
Granted FY2026still arriving
10
Grants FY2026still arriving
3
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$341k
02FY2026 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,737
Median grant
3
States reached
$808k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HUSSON UNIVERSITY$9,474
MAINE MARITIME ACADEMY$4,737
EMCC$4,737
UUNIVERSITY OF MAINE - ORONO$4,737
SMCC$4,737
THOMAS COLLEGE$2,368
ALFRED UNIVERSITY$2,368
RIT$2,368
UNIVERSITY OF MAINE - AUGUSTA$2,368
GRAND VIEW UNIVERSITY$592
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RIT: $2k → 14%ALFRED UNIVERSITY: $3k → 19%FLORIDA GULF COAST UNIVERSITY: $3k → 11%FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY: $6k → 11%GRAND VIEW UNIVERSITY: $2k → 10%JOHNSON & WALES UNIVERSITY: $2k → 14%MAINE COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN: $3k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF MAINE - AUGUSTA: $2k → 12%UUNIVERSITY OF MAINE - ORONO: $9k → 15%ALFRED UNIVERSITY: $2k → 19%SMCC: $5k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF MAINE - AUGUSTA: $2k → 12%UUNIVERSITY OF MAINE - ORONO: $5k → 15%ALFRED UNIVERSITY: $2k → 19%SOUTHERN MAINE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $4k → 7%THOMAS COLLEGE: $9k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF MAINE-ORONO: $4k → 15%SOUTHERN MAINE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $3k → 7%THOMAS COLLEGE: $2k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF MAINE-ORONO: $4k → 15%SMCC: $3k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF MAINE-ORONO: $3k → 15%SMCC: $2k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF MAINE-ORONO: $3k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE: $3k → 7%HUSSON UNIVERSITY: $16k → 15%EMCC: $12k → 15%EMCC: $11k → 15%HUSSON UNIVERSITY: $9k → 15%HUSSON UNIVERSITY: $9k → 15%EMCC: $5k → 15%HUSSON UNIVERSITY: $4k → 15%HUSSON UNIVERSITY: $4k → 15%HUSSON UNIVERSITY: $4k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF MAINE-AUGUSTA: $4k → 15%EASTERN MAINE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $4k → 15%EASTERN MAINE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $4k → 15%HUSSON UNIVERSITY: $4k → 15%EASTERN MAINE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $4k → 15%HUSSON UNIVERSITY: $4k → 15%HUSSON UNIVERSITY: $3k → 15%HUSSON UNIVERSITY: $3k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF MAINE-AUGUSTA: $3k → 15%EASTERN MAINE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $3k → 15%EASTERN MAINE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $3k → 15%EASTERN MAINE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $3k → 15%HUSSON UNIVERSITY: $3k → 15%HUSSON UNIVERSITY: $3k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of Fred Forsyth Educational Fd’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 94% of the giving stays in RI; by stated purpose, 89%.

Fred Forsyth Educational Fdlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$348k · 13 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2026, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
10

Total granted

$348k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+48%

Still filing today

31%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CB
    CO BANK OF AMERICA NA
    3× · 2018–2020 · $113k
  • HU
    Husson University
    6× · 2021–2026 · $72k · revenue +18%
  • E
    EMCC
    3× · 2024–2026 · $28k

Funded once

  • FA
    FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2024 · $6k
  • MC
    MAINE COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGNgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +48%
  • FG
    FLORIDA GULF COAST UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colby-Sawyer College

Institute of Higher Learning

Education
2
New England College

An independent liberal arts college offering undergraduate, graduate and professional programs.

Education
3
Monmouth College

To create and sustain an environment that is committed to liberal arts education.

Education
4
Massachusetts Higher Education

Provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
5
Merrimack College

Merrimack college is a comprehensive, catholic augustinian institution of higher education.

Education
6
Western New England University

See Schedule O Statement for Part III, Line 1 that also applies to Part I, Line 1

Education
7
University of Maine Foundation

Fundraising and endowment management for the benefit of the University of Maine

Education
8
Franklin & Marshall College

A residential college dedicated to excellence in undergraduate liberal arts education.

Education
9
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover share knowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and develop leadership expressed in service to others.

Education
10
Eastern University

Eastern University is a diverse, Christ-centered community preparing graduates to impact the world through faith, reason, and justice.

Education
11
Endicott College

Undergraduate and graduate education. (see schedule o)endicott integrates professional and liberal arts with experiential learning including internships.

Education
12
Williams College

Williams College strives to achieve educational excellence by fostering a community of learning in collaboration with students, faculty, staff, devoted alumni and parents.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Maine College of Art and Design; the most unlike its peers is Grand View University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
3/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CO BANK OF AMERICA NA: $113,234 · OtherCO BANK OF AMERICA NAEMCC: $28,074 · OtherEMCCEASTERN MAINE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $27,379 · OtherEASTERN MAINE COMMUNITY COLLEGEUNIVERSITY OF MAINE SYSTEM INC: $18,254 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MAINE SYSTEM INCUUNIVERSITY OF MAINE - ORONO: $16,405 · OtherUUNIVERSITY OF MAINE - ORONOUNIVERSITY OF MAINE-AUGUSTA: $16,084 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MAINE-AUGUSTAMAINE MARITIME ACADEMY: $13,918 · OtherSMCC: $10,205 · Other+10 more: $32,836 · Other+10 moreHusson University: $72,480 · EducationHusson UniversityTHOMAS COLLEGE: $13,891 · EducationTHOMAS COLLEGEALFRED UNIVERSITY: $7,837 · EducationALFRED UNIVERSITY+3 more: $8,482 · Education+3 more
Other$276,389Education$102,690

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHusson University: $72,480 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS COLLEGE: $13,891 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALFRED UNIVERSITY: $7,837 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAINE COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN: $3,154 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND VIEW UNIVERSITY: $2,960 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNSON & WALES UNIVERSITY: $2,368 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Husson University ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ALFRED UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MAINE COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN ↗
  • Who funds GRAND VIEW UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds JOHNSON & WALES UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Albert H YoungME13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Albert H Young · William Searls Scholarship Fund First National Bank Trustee · Vera Grace Greenlaw Trust Portland Trust Co LLC · Davis Educational Foundation · Maine Community Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fred Forsyth Educational Fd funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fred Forsyth Educational Fd. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fred Forsyth Educational Fd’s filings →

    More from the funding graph