Skip to content

· Private foundation

Fred Fatzler Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$90k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$137kEducation$108kEnvironment$44kYouth Development$29kHuman Services$29kAnimals$28kPhilanthropy$25kFood & Nutrition$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $74k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $16k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOBART & WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGE$15,739
CHESHIRE HOME$5,000
LINC PROGRAM INC$5,000
ST HUBERTS ANIMAL WELFARE CENTER$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
CHURCH OF THE LITTLE FLOWER - KINDNESS TEAM$5,000
WILSON COLLEGE$5,000
FOUNDATION FOR MORRISTOWN MEDICAL CENTER$5,000
GREAT SWAMP WATERSHED ASSOCIATION$5,000
OVERLOOK HOSPITAL$5,000
THE ARC OF UNION COUNTY INC$5,000
NJSGA CADDY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION$5,000
INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY$5,000
MIDLAND ADULT SERVICES INC - RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES$5,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 4%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CHESHIRE HOME: $5k → 4%CHESHIRE HOME: $5k → 4%CHESHIRE HOME: $5k → 4%CHESHIRE HOME: $5k → 4%CHESHIRE HOME: $5k → 4%CHESHIRE HOME: $3k → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
RI
NC
DC
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$438k · 21 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
12

Total granted

$438k
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
0%

Still filing today

48%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesEnvironmentFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    Foundation for Morristown Medical Center
    6× · 2020–2025 · $34k · revenue +56%
  • HOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGES
    3× · 2020–2025 · $32k · revenue +74%
  • TA
    The Arc of Union County Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $29k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • MP
    MOUNTAIN PROJECTS INC (HURRICANE RELIEF)
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • GF
    GOLF FIGHTS CANCER INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
  • HL
    HARDING LAND TRUST ENDOWMENT CAMPAIGN
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Morris College

The mission of morris college is to produce graduates who can pursue useful and productive careers and in so doing enhance their own lives and the society in which they take their places. that mission is being successfully implemented by…

Education
2
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
3
University of Maryland Neurosurgeryassociates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Education
4
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
Manhattan University

Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…

Education
9
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
11
University of Maryland Dermatologists Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
12
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Elon University; the most unlike its peers is The Arc of Union County Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $29,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERSMIDLAND ADULT SERVICES INC - RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES: $29,000 · OtherMIDLAND ADULT SERVICES INC - RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIESThe Arc of Union County Inc: $29,000 · OtherThe Arc of Union County IncNJSGA CADDY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $29,000 · OtherNJSGA CADDY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $28,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST HUBERTS ANIMAL WELFARE CENTER: $28,000 · OtherST HUBERTS ANIMAL WELFARE CENTEROVERLOOK HOSPITAL: $27,000 · OtherOVERLOOK HOSPITALOLD ROAD FUND INC: $25,000 · OtherOLD ROAD FUND INCCHURCH OF THE LITTLE FLOWER - KINDNESS TEAM: $15,000 · OtherSILVER LIMING FOUNDATION: $13,000 · Other+13 more: $42,300 · Other+13 moreHOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGES: $31,905 · EducationHOBART AND WILLIA…WILSON COLLEGE: $28,000 · EducationWILSON COLLEGEElon University: $6,000 · EducationElon UniversityFairfield University: $4,000 · EducationMORRIS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 · Education+1 more: $2,000 · EducationFoundation for Morristown Medical Center: $34,000 · HealthCHESHIRE HOME INC: $28,000 · Human ServicesGreat Swamp Watershed Association: $26,000 · EnvironmentINTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY INC: $15,000 · Food & NutritionGOLF FIGHTS CANCER INC: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$294,300Education$75,405Health$34,000Human Services$28,000Environment$26,000Food & Nutrition$15,000Philanthropy$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFoundation for Morristown Medical Center: $34,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGES: $31,905 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Arc of Union County Inc: $29,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWILSON COLLEGE: $28,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHESHIRE HOME INC: $28,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGreat Swamp Watershed Association: $26,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetINTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMELANOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetElon University: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGOLF FIGHTS CANCER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFairfield University: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMORRIS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Foundation for Morristown Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds HOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGES ↗
  • Who funds The Arc of Union County Inc ↗
  • Who funds WILSON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CHESHIRE HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds Great Swamp Watershed Association ↗
  • Who funds INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds MELANOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Elon University ↗
  • Who funds GOLF FIGHTS CANCER INC ↗
  • Who funds Fairfield University ↗
  • Who funds MORRIS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charities Aid Foundation AmericaVA15.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · Investors Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fred Fatzler Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fred Fatzler Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Cheshire Home Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Fairfield University: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Fred Fatzler Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Fred Fatzler Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fred Fatzler’s filings →

More from the funding graph