Skip to content
Fred F Silk Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Fred F Silk Charitable Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$534k
Granted FY2020
16
Grants FY2020
2
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

90% of Fred F Silk Charitable Foundation’s FY2021 grant dollars went to Stark Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2021 names 19 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Fred F Silk Charitable Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 9 organizations, $534k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

15
’17
16
’18
18
’19
9
’20
19
’21

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Philanthropy$17MEducation$2.1MHuman Services$533kHousing & Shelter$369kArts & Culture$349kHealth$325kReligion$173kFood & Nutrition$100kOther$0
02FY2020 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k9 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $85k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $407k
$9,800
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Habitat for Humanity East Central O$150,000
Aultman Foundation$101,385
JR Coleman SR Outreach Services$97,500
St John's Villa Inc$58,275
Aultman College$46,700
YMCA of Western Stark County$20,000
Goshen College$18,500
Beech Creek Botanical GardenNature$9,800
St John Villa Inc$5,500
Arts in Stark$5,000
Stark Community Foundation$5,000
Canton Symphony Orchestra Associati$5,000
Pathway Caring for Children$5,000
EN-RICH-Ment$2,500
JR Coleman SR Outreach Services$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $354k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%St John's Villa Inc: $58k → 12%ST JOHN'S VILLA: $41k → 12%YMCA OF CENTRAL STARK COUNTY: $140k → 13%St John's Villa Inc: $37k → 12%St John's Villa Inc: $20k → 12%St John's Villa Inc: $19k → 12%YMCA of Central Stark County: $20k → 13%YMCA of Central Stark County: $19k → 13%YMCA of Central Stark County: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 21 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against -28% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2020, 11 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
12

Total granted

$2.6M
$405k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
-28%

Still filing today

71%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $886k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    STARK STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2021 · $578k · revenue +271% · 42% of their budget
  • WU
    Walsh University Inc
    3× · 2017–2021 · $335k · revenue +3%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST CENTRAL OHIO
    4× · 2017–2020 · $304k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • AC
    Aultman Cancer Center
    one grant, 2019 · $102k
  • NM
    NEOhio Medical University Foundatio
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • JR
    J R COLEMAN SENIOR OUTREACH
    one grant, 2019 · $51k · revenue -79%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The College of Wooster

The college of wooster is a community of independent minds, working together to prepare students to become leaders of character and influence in an interdependent global community. (continued on schedule o)we engage motivated students in a…

Education
2
Mount Carmel College of Nursing

We, mount carmel and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.mount carmel college of nursing is a member of mount carmel and trinity health.

—
3
Otterbein University

Otterbein University is an inclusive community dedicated to educating the whole person in the context of humane values. Our mission is to prepare graduates to think deeply and broadly, to engage locally and globally, and to advance their…

Education
4
Mount St Joseph University

Mount st. joseph university is a catholic academic community grounded in the spiritual values and vision of its founders, the sisters of charity. the university educates its students through interdisciplinary liberal arts and professional…

Education
5
Capital University

Capital university transforms lives by empowering an inclusive community of learners through engaging academic, co-curricular, and professional experiences.

Education
6
Cleveland Institute of Music

The cleveland institute of music's mission is to empower the world's most talented classical music students to fulfill their dreams and potential.

Education
7
Union Hospital Inc

We exist to serve our patients with compassionate health care of the highest quality.

Health
8
Ohio Christian University

Ohio christian university (ocu) is committed to offering a complete education that develops students intellectually, professionally, and spiritually. (continued on schedule o)ocu offers degree programs designed to equip students to become…

Education
9
Oucu Financial Credit Union Fka Ohio University Credit Union

Provide financial services to its members.

—
10
Cincinnati Museum Center

Cincinnati museum center inspires people of all ages to learn more about our world through science, regional history, and educational, engaging and meaningful experiences.

Arts & Culture
11
Mount Carmel Health System

We, mount carmel health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. mount carmel health system is a member of trinity health.

—
12
Calvin University

The mission of calvin university is to equip students to think deeply, to act justly, and to live wholeheartedly as christ's agents of renewal in the world.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Stark Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Canines Helping Independent People. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/26
Grantees still filing
18/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

STARK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $16,751,918 · PhilanthropySTARK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION+1 more: $10,000 · PhilanthropySTARK STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $578,487 · EducationMALONE UNIVERSITY: $350,000 · EducationWalsh University Inc: $335,000 · EducationUniversity of Mount Union: $250,000 · EducationGoshen College Inc: $89,500 · EducationNEOHIO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $250,000 · OtherMERCY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $117,000 · OtherAULTMAN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $112,850 · OtherAultman Cancer Center: $101,750 · OtherAultman Foundation: $101,385 · OtherJR Coleman SR Outreach Services: $100,000 · OtherNEOhio Medical University Foundatio: $100,000 · OtherYoung Mens Christian Association of Massillon YMCA Of Western Stark County: $70,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $65,000 · OtherJ R COLEMAN SENIOR OUTREACH: $50,575 · OtherHEARTBEATS TO THE CITY: $50,000 · OtherPATHWAY CARING FOR CHILDREN: $48,000 · Other+16 more: $206,800 · OtherYMCA of Central Stark County: $180,011 · Human ServicesST JOHN'S VILLA INC: $174,275 · Human ServicesHABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST CENTRAL OHIO: $304,225 · Housing & ShelterSTARK COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $150,100 · Arts & CultureCanton Symphony Orchestra Association: $80,000 · Arts & CultureARTS IN STARK: $25,000 · Arts & CultureEN-RICH-MENT: $13,500 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $5,000 · Arts & CultureREFUGE OF HOPE MINISTRIES: $171,000 · Religion
Philanthropy$16,761,918Education$1,602,987Other$1,373,360Human Services$354,286Housing & Shelter$304,225Arts & Culture$273,600Religion$171,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTARK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $16,751,918 over 3y, 24% of budgetSTARK STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $578,487 over 4y, 42% of budgetMALONE UNIVERSITY: $350,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetWalsh University Inc: $335,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST CENTRAL OHIO: $304,225 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetUniversity of Mount Union: $250,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYMCA of Central Stark County: $180,011 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetST JOHN'S VILLA INC: $174,275 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetREFUGE OF HOPE MINISTRIES: $171,000 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetSTARK COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $150,100 over 3y, 6.8% of budgetMERCY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $117,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetGoshen College Inc: $89,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCanton Symphony Orchestra Association: $80,000 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetYoung Mens Christian Association of Massillon YMCA Of Western Stark County: $70,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetJ R COLEMAN SENIOR OUTREACH: $50,575 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetHEARTBEATS TO THE CITY: $50,000 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetPATHWAY CARING FOR CHILDREN: $48,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetMASSILLON MUSEUM: $40,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetARTS IN STARK: $25,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetWhole Latte Love Cafe Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetThe Canton Student Loan Foundation: $15,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetEN-RICH-MENT: $13,500 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetA CHORUS FOR A CAUSE: $10,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetMAGNOLIA AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $5,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetOHIO MENNONITE CAMP ASSOCIATION INC: $3,250 over 4y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Stark Community Found…Hoover Foundation Inc…Timken Foundation of …Timken Co Charitable …Ada C Rank & Helen J …Henry & Louise Timken…Albert W & Edith V Fl…The Belden Brick Char…Sisters of Charity Fo…The Paul and Carol Da…Austin-Bailey Health …Health Foundation of …
Stark Community FoundationOH46.5× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Stark Community Foundation · Hoover Foundation Income Account · Timken Foundation of Canton · Timken Co Charitable & Educational Fund · Ada C Rank & Helen J Rank Charitable · Henry & Louise Timken Foundation · Albert W & Edith V Flowers Charitable · The Belden Brick Charitable Trust · Sisters of Charity Foundation of Canton · The Paul and Carol David Foundation · Austin-Bailey Health & Wellness Foundation · Health Foundation of Greater Massillon

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fred F Silk Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fred F Silk Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Fred F Silk Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Fred F Silk Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fred F Silk’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home