Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Fred & Catalina Aranas Family Foundinc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$86k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Food & Nutrition$197kHealth$171kArts & Culture$142kEducation$28kPhilanthropy$25kReligion$23kHuman Services$21kScience & Tech$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA FOUNDATION$25,000
ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC$20,000
DIOCESE OF SAVANNAH$15,000
HIGH MUSEUM OF ART$5,000
SCHWOB SCHOOL OF MUSIC - CSU$5,000
MERCYMED$3,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS GEORGIA$2,000
COLUMBUS RIVER CENTER$2,000
COLUMBUS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$1,000
FEEDING THE VALLEY$1,000
ATLANTA SCIENCE FESTIVAL-SCIENCE ATL$1,000
VALLEY RESCUE MISSION$1,000
ATLANTA INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL$1,000
COLUMBUS MUSEUM$1,000
GIVING KITCHEN$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%QUALITY CARE FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 13%QUALITY CARE FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 13%QUALITY CARE FOR CHILDREN: $2k → 13%QUALITY CARE FOR CHILDREN: $2k → 13%KATE'S CLUB: $3k → 14%KATE'S CLUB: $3k → 14%KATE'S CLUB: $1k → 14%KATE'S CLUB: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$582k · 29 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

29 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
13

Total granted

$582k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+19%

Still filing today

66%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthFood & NutritionEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $176k · revenue +74%
  • RW
    ROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $40k · revenue +54%
  • FI
    Fernbank Inc
    7× · 2018–2024 · $33k · revenue +73%

Funded once

  • AC
    ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • SC
    SCOTTDALE CHILD DEVELOPMENT AND FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
  • SO
    SHRINE OF THE IMMACULATE CONCEPTION
    one grant, 2019 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Acfb Support Organization Inc

Acfb support organization, inc., is operated exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes and/or activities of atlanta community food bank, inc., a georgia nonprofit corporation.

Food & Nutrition
2
Metro Atlanta Chamber of Commerce Inc

The corporation is a voluntary association of individuals and organizations the purposes of which are to upgrade and advance the atlanta metropolitan area in population, commerce and finance; to effect civic and social improvements; to…

3
Acfb Charitable Investments Inc

Acfb charitable investments, inc., is operated exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes and/or activities of atlanta community food bank, inc., a georgia nonprofit corporation.

Food & Nutrition
4
Atlfamilymeal Inc

Atlfamilymeal inc.'s mission is to feed, nourish and support hospitality workers and their families experiencing hunger and joblessness in the metro atlanta community.

Food & Nutrition
5
Georgia Advanced Technology Ventures Inc

The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively as a supporting organization to and for the benefit of the georgia institute of technology to foster and support education and scientific research and economic development…

Education
6
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Inc

To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.

Health
7
The Georgia Center for Nonprofits

Our mission is to create thriving communities by helping nonprofits succeed. our work revolves around four primary areas of focus.1. we are a hub for social innovation 2. we are a capacity accelerator for organizations and their people3.…

Community Improvement
8
Enable of Georgia Inc

Supporting people with special needs to lead fulfilled lives.

Housing & Shelter
9
Acmg Foundation for Genetic and Genomic Medicine

Support the american college of medical genetics and genomics' (acmg) educational mission to "translate genes into health" by raising funds to attract the next generation of medical geneticists and genetic counselors, to sponsor important…

10
Community Farmers Markets Inc

To develop a local food infrastructure for long term sustainability and meaningful community impact and grow a diverse local food culture by maintaining an authentic space for all people to share community, fair food, and healthy…

Food & Nutrition
11
The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc

Atlanta is #1 for income inequality in the nation. as such, the needs in our community are pressing and we need to move with the urgency of now to address those needs. the community foundation has unequivocally embraced equity as our #1…

Philanthropy
12
The Arc of Southwest Georgia Inc

Our mission is to create life-changing solutions for people with disabilities.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Easter Seals Southern Georgia Inc and the most unlike its peers is Feeding the Valley Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyArts & Cultural Organizatio…International Humanitarian …Christian Worship Communiti…Georgia Advocacy & Communit…Faith-Based Schools and Ear…Affordable Housing Developm…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 10. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number30%0%<5yr18%0%5–10yr22%19%10–20yr14%10%20–35yr8%33%35–55yr8%38%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value30%0%<5yr18%0%5–10yr22%3%10–20yr14%2%20–35yr8%68%35–55yr8%28%55yr+

The field is 30% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 21% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/28
the rest of the field
21%
6,748/32,372

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
19/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA FOUNDATION — $132,600 · OtherCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA FOUNDATIONSCHWOB SCHOOL OF MUSIC - CSU — $30,000 · OtherSCHWOB SCHOOL OF MUSIC - CSUMERCYMED — $23,000 · OtherMERCYMEDATLANTA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $20,000 · OtherATLANTA COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONCATHOLIC DIOCESE OF SAVANNAH — $15,000 · OtherCATHOLIC DIOCESE OF SAVANNAHATLANTA SCIENCE FESTIVAL-SCIENCE ATL — $9,000 · Other+21 more — $34,500 · Other+21 moreATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC — $175,500 · Food & NutritionATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INCOPEN HAND ATLANTA INC — $14,500 · Food & NutritionOPEN HAND ATLANTA INC+1 more — $5,000 · Food & NutritionROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC — $40,000 · Arts & CultureROBERT W WOODRUFF …Fernbank Inc — $32,500 · Arts & CultureFernbank IncRIVERCENTER INC — $13,100 · Arts & CultureRIVERCENTER INCCOLUMBUS PHILHARMONIC GUILD INC — $10,800 · Arts & CultureCOLUMBUS PHILHARMO…THE COLUMBUS MUSEUM INC — $9,000 · Arts & CultureTHE COLUMBUS MUSEU…ATLANTA INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL — $18,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION — $8,000 · Education+1 more — $700 · EducationQUALITY CARE FOR CHILDREN INC — $12,000 · Human ServicesKATE'S CLUB INC — $7,000 · Human ServicesEASTER SEALS SOUTHERN GEORGIA INC — $11,500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $1,750 · HealthSENECA CHOICES FOR LIFE INC — $1,000 · Health+1 more — $200 · HealthTHE GIVING KITCHEN INITIATIVE INC — $4,500 · PhilanthropyInternational Friendship Ministries Inc — $2,350 · Philanthropy
Other$264,100Food & Nutrition$195,000Arts & Culture$105,400Education$26,700Human Services$19,000Health$14,450Philanthropy$6,850

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC — $175,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC — $40,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFernbank Inc — $32,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetATLANTA INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL — $18,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN HAND ATLANTA INC — $14,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERCENTER INC — $13,100 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetQUALITY CARE FOR CHILDREN INC — $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEASTER SEALS SOUTHERN GEORGIA INC — $11,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBUS PHILHARMONIC GUILD INC — $10,800 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetTHE COLUMBUS MUSEUM INC — $9,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION — $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKATE'S CLUB INC — $7,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetVALLEY RESCUE MISSION — $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding the Valley Inc — $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GIVING KITCHEN INITIATIVE INC — $4,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Friendship Ministries Inc — $2,350 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS GEORGIA INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $1,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSENECA CHOICES FOR LIFE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSCIENCE ATL INC D/B/A ATLANTA SCIENCE FESTIVAL INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetColumbus State University Foundation Inc — $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds ROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC
  • Who funds Fernbank Inc
  • Who funds ATLANTA INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL
  • Who funds OPEN HAND ATLANTA INC
  • Who funds RIVERCENTER INC
  • Who funds QUALITY CARE FOR CHILDREN INC
  • Who funds EASTER SEALS SOUTHERN GEORGIA INC
  • Who funds COLUMBUS PHILHARMONIC GUILD INC
  • Who funds THE COLUMBUS MUSEUM INC
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds KATE'S CLUB INC
  • Who funds VALLEY RESCUE MISSION
  • Who funds Feeding the Valley Inc
  • Who funds THE GIVING KITCHEN INITIATIVE INC
  • Who funds International Friendship Ministries Inc
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS GEORGIA INC
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds LIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC
  • Who funds SENECA CHOICES FOR LIFE INC
  • Who funds SCIENCE ATL INC D/B/A ATLANTA SCIENCE FESTIVAL INC
  • Who funds Columbus State University Foundation Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Chattahoochee Valley IncGA23.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Chattahoochee Valley Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Mildred Miller Fort Foundation Inc · Lockwood Partners Foundation Inc · The Jordan Foundation Inc · Jackson-Burgin Foundation Inc · Bradley-Turner Foundation Inc · The Patton Foundation Inc · Pat and Jack Wilensky Family Foundation · Richard and Helen Robbins Family Foundation Inc · The Ashok and Mary Kumar Foundatio Inc · The Shelby and Wanda Amos Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Fred & Catalina Aranas Family Foundinc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Feed the Children Inc1% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Fred & Catalina Aranas Family Foundinc?

Find your warmest path to Fred & Catalina Aranas Family Foundinc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph