Skip to content

· Private foundation

Fred & Florence Dengler Scholarship Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$60k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$387kYouth Development$32kHealth$18k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $31k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$846k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY$19,500
SAGINAW VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY$11,500
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY$8,000
GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF OLIVET$5,000
GRACE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY$5,000
MADONNA UNIVERSITY$1,500
ALMA COLLEGE$1,500
HOPE COLLEGE$1,500
MICHIGAN TECH UNIVERSITY$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY25–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 81% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF OLIVET: $5k → 9%HOPE COLLEGE: $2k → 10%GRACE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $5k → 11%ALMA COLLEGE: $2k → 12%SAGINAW VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $12k → 14%MICHIGAN TECH UNIVERSITY: $2k → 14%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 16%CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $20k → 19%MADONNA UNIVERSITY: $2k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$364k · 47 repeat orgs$71k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +7% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

47 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 39 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

47
48

Total granted

$364k
$61k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
0%

Still filing today

17%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Michigan
    4× · 2020–2024 · $15k · revenue +139%
  • AC
    ADRIAN COLLEGE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $12k · revenue +3%
  • HC
    HOPE COLLEGE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $7k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • NU
    NORTHWOOD UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • DC
    DELTA COLLEGE
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
2
Wabash College

Wabash college is a liberal arts college for men that educates them to think critically, act responsibly, lead effectively, and live humanely.

Education
3
LaGrange College

Education - lagrange college challenges the minds and inspires the souls of its students. founded in 1831 and committed to its relationship with the united methodist church and its wesleyan and liberal arts traditions, the college supports…

Education
4
Davenport University

Davenport university prepares individuals and organizations to excel in the knowledge-driven environment of the 21st century.

Education
5
Kalamazoo College

The mission of kalamazoo college is to prepare its graduates to better understand, live sucessfully within, and provide enlightened leadership to a richly diverse and increasingly complex world. as a highly selective, nationally renowened…

Education
6
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
7
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
8
Union College

Union college is a seventh-day adventist community of higher education, inspired by jesus christ, and dedicated to empowering students to learn, serve, and lead.

Education
9
Macalester College

Macalester is committed to being a preeminent liberal arts college with an educational program known for its high standards for scholarship and its special emphasis on internationalism, multiculturalism, and service to society.

Education
10
Spring Arbor University

Spring arbor university is a community of learners distinguished by our lifelong involvement in the study and application of the liberal arts, total commitment to jesus christ as the perspective for learning and critical participation in…

Education
11
Simpson College

Through innovative learning opportunities, individual student attention, and an unwavering commitment to inclusive educational access, simpson college cultivates a diverse community of learners to lead lives of meaning and purpose.

Education
12
Calvin University

The mission of calvin university is to equip students to think deeply, to act justly, and to live wholeheartedly as christ's agents of renewal in the world.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Albion College; the most unlike its peers is Burr Oak 4-H Club - Michigan State. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 98 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $58,450 · OtherCENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITYLANSING COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $33,125 · OtherLANSING COMMUNITY COLLEGEMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $32,500 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITYSAGINAW VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $30,875 · OtherSAGINAW VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITYGRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $18,375 · OtherUniversity of Michigan: $15,250 · OtherMICHIGAN TECH UNIVERSITY: $12,850 · Other+82 more: $156,090 · Other+82 moreADRIAN COLLEGE: $12,475 · EducationADRIAN COLLE…ALMA COLLEGE: $7,750 · EducationALMA COLLEGEHOPE COLLEGE: $6,750 · EducationHOPE COLLEGEMadonna University: $6,500 · EducationMadonna Univ…GRACE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · EducationGRACE CHRIST…LAKELAND UNIVERSITY: $4,125 · EducationLAKELAND UNI…ALBION COLLEGE: $2,500 · EducationNorthwood University: $2,375 · EducationBurr Oak 4-H Club - Michigan State: $32,100 · Youth Development
Other$357,515Education$47,475Youth Development$32,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBurr Oak 4-H Club - Michigan State: $32,100 over 4y, 14% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $15,250 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetADRIAN COLLEGE: $12,475 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetALMA COLLEGE: $7,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE COLLEGE: $6,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMadonna University: $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGRACE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAKELAND UNIVERSITY: $4,125 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALBION COLLEGE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwood University: $2,375 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND RAPIDS COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1,750 over 1y, 21% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Burr Oak 4-H Club - Michigan State ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds ADRIAN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ALMA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds HOPE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Madonna University ↗
  • Who funds GRACE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LAKELAND UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ALBION COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Gerber FoundationMI20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Gerber Foundation · Myer & Lois Franklin Charitable Tr · Wilson Scholarship Fund · Speerstra Peter & Evelyn · The VombergTrumley Foundation · Kanitz Louis J & Golda I Main Ac · Richard Baidas Memorial Scholarship Fund · Culver's Foundation Inc · Charles Koch Foundation · Charles Stewart Mott Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fred & Florence Dengler Scholarship Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fred & Florence Dengler Scholarship Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 98 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fred & Florence Dengler Scholarship’s filings →

    More from the funding graph