Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Fred and Donna Nives Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$815k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212024.

Animals$515kHuman Services$235kHealth$150kRecreation & Sports$55kArts & Culture$30k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $800k
$150,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$40M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC$150,000
FARM SANCTUARY INC$150,000
PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC (PETA)$150,000
FIDELCO GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION INC$150,000
ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND$85,000
ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND$65,000
ADOPT-A-DOG INC$50,000
GREENWICH RIDING & TRAILS ASSOCIATION INC$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $385k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%VETERANS AIRLIFT COMMAND: $50k → 11%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $150k → 9%FIDELCO GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION INC: $150k → 11%VETERANS AIRLIFT COMMAND: $35k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
NY
CT
CA
VA
NC
SC
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 15% of Fred and Donna Nives Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 30% of the giving stays in NY; read by stated purpose it is 36% — more of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Fred and Donna Nives Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

19%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$185k · 5 repeat orgs$800k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
6

Total granted

$185k
$800k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+22%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 2% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $800k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHuman ServicesArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VA
    VETERANS AIRLIFT COMMAND
    2× · 2022–2023 · $85k · revenue +9%
  • PF
    PATRIOT FOUNDATION
    3× · 2021–2023 · $15k · revenue +136%
  • WI
    WWWPILOTSNPAWSORG INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $15k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • GE
    GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC
    one grant, 2024 · $150k · revenue +22%
  • AL
    ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC
    one grant, 2024 · $150k · revenue +10%
  • FS
    FARM SANCTUARY INC
    one grant, 2024 · $150k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
2
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
3
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals
4
Patriot Paws Service Dogs

To train and provide service dogs of the highest quality at no cost to disabled american veterans and others with mobile disabilities in order to help restore their physical and emotional independence.

Human Services
5
Guide Dog Foundation for the Blind Inc

The guide dog foundation for the blind, inc. provides guide and service dogs free of charge to provide increased independence, enhanced mobility, and companionship to people who are blind, visually impaired or have other disablities. the…

6
Animal Adoption Foundation

Aaf is a no kill shelter for domestic animals that have been abused and abandoned. aaf provides and coordinates adoption, spay/nueter, and educational programs, which aim to reduce and control pet population. aaf maintains temporary…

Animals
7
Friends for Animals of Metro Detroit

The friends are dedicated to the rescue, protection, and adoption of companion animals in need while inspiring the human-animal bond. we meet our mission by:-saving 100% of healthy and treatable animals.-providing high-quality animal care…

Animals
8
Leashes of Valor

Our organization's mission is to raise awareness for and provide physical aid and support to disabled us military veterans. our program covers a crucial gap in the industry-a veteran operated organization, that can assist veterans with…

Public Benefit
9
Pets for Vets Inc

Pets for Vets enriches the lives of veterans by creating a life-changing Super Bond with expertly selected and trained shelter or rescue pets. It provides ongoing expert support to ensure a reciprocal and thriving partnership at no cost to…

Public Benefit
10
Beagle Freedom Project

Beagle freedom project's mission is to eliminate the suffering of all animals. this goal is achieved by rescuing exploited, abused, unwanted and homeless animals and by educating the public of the vast extent of the suffering animals…

Animals
11
Pets for Patriots Inc

The organization's mission is to transform the lives of veterans by helping them save an at risk shelter dog or cat, and to end all animal homelessness in the us and enrich the lives of men and women who serve, and have served our country.…

Animals
12
America's Vetdogs the Veterans K-9 Corps Inc

To assist disabled veterans, active military personnel, first responders with disabilities, and those who have served our country honorably to live with dignity and independence. america's vetdogs trains and places guide dogs for…

Public Benefit

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fidelco Guide Dog Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC — $150,000 · AnimalsANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INCFARM SANCTUARY INC — $150,000 · AnimalsFARM SANCTUARY INCPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC — $150,000 · AnimalsPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INCADOPT-A-DOG INC — $50,000 · AnimalsADOPT-A-DOG INC+1 more — $15,000 · AnimalsGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC — $150,000 · Human ServicesGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INCFIDELCO GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION INC — $150,000 · Human ServicesFIDELCO GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION INCVETERANS AIRLIFT COMMAND — $85,000 · Human ServicesVETERANS AIRLIFT COMMANDGREENWICH RIDING & TRAILS ASSOCIATION INC — $40,000 · OtherAFSA EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $30,000 · Arts & CulturePATRIOT FOUNDATION — $15,000 · Recreation & Sports
Animals$515,000Human Services$385,000Other$40,000Arts & Culture$30,000Recreation & Sports$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC — $150,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC — $150,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFARM SANCTUARY INC — $150,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetFIDELCO GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION INC — $150,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC — $150,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVETERANS AIRLIFT COMMAND — $85,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetADOPT-A-DOG INC — $50,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetGREENWICH RIDING & TRAILS ASSOCIATION INC — $40,000 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetAFSA EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetPATRIOT FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetWWWPILOTSNPAWSORG INC — $15,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Fred and Donna Nives Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Fred and Donna Nives Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Fred and Donna Nives Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph