Skip to content

· Public charity

Fraternal Order of Eagles

An international, non-profit organization, united fraternally in the spirit of liberty, truth, justice, and equality, to make human life more desirable by lessening its ills, and by promoting peace, propserity, gladness and hope.

$112k
Granted FY2019
5
Grants FY2019
1
States reached
$45k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

65% of Fraternal Order of Eagles’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Adams County Community Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year Fraternal Order of Eagles named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $75k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

2
’17
3
’18
5
’19
2
’20
1
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Public Safety & Disaster$199kPhilanthropy$80kRecreation & Sports$43kArts & Culture$25kEnvironment$15kAnimals$14kEducation$10k
02FY2019 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $74,950, the rows itemized in this filing. The $112,172 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $37,222 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k4 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $45k
$8,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$805k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MASON DIXON ABATE OF PA$44,500
ALPHA FIRE CO$8,950
DOG TAGS$8,000
LITTLESTOWN AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY$7,500
LITTLESTOWN HIGH SCHOOL FOOTBALL$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 37% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%DOG TAGS: $8k → 8%ADAMS COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $44k → 9%MASON DIXON ABATE OF PA: $45k → 9%PA STATE AERIE FOE: $15k → 10%GRAND AERIE CHARITIES: $16k → 15%DOG TAGS: $6k → 8%ADAMS COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20k → 9%MASON DIXON ABATE OF PA: $35k → 9%ALPHA FIRE CO: $52k → 9%MASON DIXON ABATE OF PA: $32k → 9%LITTLESTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT: $31k → 9%ALPHA FIRE CO: $27k → 9%LITTLESTOWN BOROUGH: $10k → 9%LITTLESTOWN HIGH SCHOOL: $10k → 9%ALPHA FIRE CO: $9k → 9%LITTLESTOWN BOROUGH: $8k → 9%LITTLESTOWN AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $8k → 9%LITTLESTOWN HIGH SCHOOL FOOTBALL: $6k → 9%LITTLESTOWN HIGH SCHOOL FOOTBALL: $6k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$243k · 5 repeat orgs$79k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2019, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call). Read against FY2019, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
2

Total granted

$243k
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-6%
+68%

Still filing today

40%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’24
Public Safety & DisasterAnimalsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AO
    ALLIANCE OF BIKERS AIMED TOWARD EDUCATION - MASON DIXON
    3× · 2017–2019 · $111k
  • AF
    ALPHA FIRE COMPANY NO 1 INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $88k · revenue -6%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2017–2018 · $18k

Funded once

  • LA
    LITTLESTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2017 · $31k
  • GA
    GRAND AERIE FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLESgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $16k · revenue +68%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/6
Grantees still filing
4/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALLIANCE OF BIKERS AIMED TOWARD EDUCATION - MASON DIXON: $111,401 · OtherALLIANCE OF BIKERS AIMED TOWARD EDUCATION - MASON DIXONLITTLESTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT: $31,360 · OtherLITTLESTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICTIndividual grant recipient: $17,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGRAND AERIE FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES: $16,000 · OtherGRAND AERIE FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLESPA STATE AERIE FOE: $14,520 · OtherPA STATE AERIE FOELITTLESTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT: $11,950 · OtherLITTLESTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICTLITTLESTOWN HIGH SCHOOL: $9,705 · OtherALPHA FIRE COMPANY NO 1 INC: $87,950 · Public Safety & DisasterALPHA FIRE COMPANY NO 1 I…ADAMS COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $64,200 · EducationADAMS COUNTY COMMU…DOG TAGS: $14,000 · AnimalsLITTLESTOWN AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $7,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$212,436Public Safety & Disaster$87,950Education$64,200Animals$14,000Arts & Culture$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALLIANCE OF BIKERS AIMED TOWARD EDUCATION - MASON DIXON: $111,401 over 3y, 21% of budgetALPHA FIRE COMPANY NO 1 INC: $87,950 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetADAMS COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $64,200 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetGRAND AERIE FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES: $16,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDOG TAGS: $14,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetLITTLESTOWN AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $7,500 over 1y, 90% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fraternal Order of Eagles funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fraternal Order of Eagles. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fraternal Order of Eagles’ filings →

    More from the funding graph