Skip to content

· Private foundation

Franklin G Berlin Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.0M
Granted FY2020
4
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$1.9M
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

95% of Franklin G Berlin Foundation’s FY2020 grant dollars went to The Community Foundation Of Sarasota Co Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2020 names 2 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
’19
2
’20

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2020.

Philanthropy$1.9MRecreation & Sports$50kScience & Tech$30kYouth Development$23kFood & Nutrition$20kCommunity Improvement$20kHuman Services$12kOther$0
02FY2020 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.9M
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SARASOTA$1,880,541
THE BAY PARK CONSERVANCY$50,000
MOTE MARINE LABORATORY$30,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HARVEST HOUSE: $20k → 9%SAFE CHILDREN COALITION INC: $2k → 9%PINES OF SARASOTA INC: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sarasota City Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
2
The Tampa Bay History Center

Discovering, preserving, and learning from our region's past to inform our common future.

Environment
3
Sarasota Memorial Healthcare Foundation

Sarasota memorial healthcare foundation, inc. is an independent fundraising organization working with sarasota memorial health care system and others to ensure the highest quality healthcare is accessible and meets the needs of our…

Health
4
Save the Manatee Club Inc

Manatee protection and preservation.

Animals
5
The Historical Society of Palm Beach

The society's primary focus is to stimulate public appreciation for the rich history and cultural heritage of palm beach county, to operate the richard and pat johnson palm beach county history museum, to perform research, and to discover,…

Arts & Culture
6
North Florida Botanical Society Inc

To establish, develop and maintain a botanical garden that celebrates the immense beauty and diversity of the earths flora.

Environment
7
Florida Research Center for
Philanthropy
8
Southwest Florida Retirement Center

Provide housing, healthcare, promote health & wellness as well as related services to seniors.

Human Services
9
Florida West Coast Public Broadcasting

Wedu is a public media resource that uses storytelling and community (see schedule o, page 40)engagement to create a more informed public.

Arts & Culture
10
Florida Surveying and Mapping
—
11
The Womens Care Florida Foundation
—
12
Florida Animal Protection Foundation
Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safe Children Coalition Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mote Marine Laboratory Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
4/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SARASOTA CO INC: $1,880,541 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SARASOTA CO INCMOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherSEASON OF SHARING COMMUNITY: $20,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF: $20,000 · Other+1 more: $3,000 · OtherThe Bay Park Conservancy Inc: $50,000 · Community ImprovementHARVEST HOUSE INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesPINES OF SARASOTA INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesSAFE CHILDREN COALITION INC: $2,000 · Human Services
Philanthropy$1,880,541Other$93,000Community Improvement$50,000Human Services$32,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SARASOTA CO INC: $1,880,541 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetThe Bay Park Conservancy Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHARVEST HOUSE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetSOUTHWEST FLORIDA COUNCIL INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAFE CHILDREN COALITION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Franklin G Berlin Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Franklin G Berlin Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Pines of Sarasota Inc: 18% of income from government
  • Southwest Florida Council Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Mote Marine Laboratory Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Safe Children Coalition Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Harvest House Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Franklin G Berlin Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Franklin G Berlin Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Franklin G Berlin’s filings →

More from the funding graph