Skip to content

· Private foundation

Franklin Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$66k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$224kReligion$97kHuman Services$63kHealth$54kYouth Development$28kPhilanthropy$13kRecreation & Sports$9kAnimals$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$3,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$722k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$20,000
C&S CHARITIES$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
SHRINERS HOSPITAL$5,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$5,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
THE ST DOMINIC FUND$2,500
SPECIAL OLYMPICS MISSOURI$2,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI$2,000
FIVE ACRES ANIMAL HOSPITAL$2,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 53% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 8%MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 5%MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%COMMUNITY LIVING INC: $1k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MT
NY
IA
MO
VA
AZ
TN
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$456k · 13 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +39% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
7

Total granted

$456k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+39%

Still filing today

46%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $24k · revenue +125%
  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS MISSOURI INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $9k · revenue +91%
  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI
    2× · 2022–2024 · $6k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • SY
    STEM2U YOUTH PROGRAMS
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +39%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
2
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
3
St Marys Healthcare System for Children Inc

To serve as the sole member of the various health care and supporting organizations that comprise st. mary's healthcare system for children

Health
4
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
5
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
6
St Charles Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
7
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
8
St Marys Hospital for Children Inc

St. mary's hospital for children ("smh"), the flagship of st. mary's healthcare system for children, is committed to improving the health and quality of life for children and young adults with special healthcare needs. a nationally…

Health
9
National Comprehensive Cancer Network

To define and advance quality, effective, equitable, and accessible cancer care and prevention so all people can live better lives.

Health
10
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
11
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
12
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Missouri and Kansas; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL: $215,000 · OtherLUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOLIMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH: $97,000 · OtherIMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCHRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $65,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSESTEM2U YOUTH PROGRAMS: $25,000 · OtherSTEM2U YOUTH PROGRAMS+10 more: $46,000 · Other+10 moreST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $23,500 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $8,000 · Health+2 more: $2,000 · HealthC&S CHARITIES INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $3,000 · PhilanthropyMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MISSOURI AND KANSAS: $4,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,500 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY LIVING INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesHUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $5,500 · Animals
Other$448,000Health$33,500Philanthropy$13,000Human Services$7,500Animals$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $23,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetC&S CHARITIES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MISSOURI INC: $9,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MISSOURI AND KANSAS: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTS JOACHIM AND ANN CARE SERVICE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY LIVING INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWARRIORS & QUIET WATERS FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds C&S CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MISSOURI INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MISSOURI AND KANSAS ↗
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds STS JOACHIM AND ANN CARE SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY LIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds WARRIORS & QUIET WATERS FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC11.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Franklin Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Franklin Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Franklin Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph