Skip to content
Frankenmuth Insurance Foundation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Private foundation

Frankenmuth Insurance Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$389k
Granted FY2024still arriving
96
Grants FY2024still arriving
15
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$314kHealth$215kHuman Services$209kPhilanthropy$201kFood & Nutrition$156kHousing & Shelter$64kArts & Culture$63kYouth Development$45kOther$0
02FY2024 · 96 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k89 grants · $209k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $80k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$2,500
Median grant
15
States reached
$5.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY$50,000
GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$50,000
UNITED WAY OF SAGINAW COUNTY$30,000
HARVEST HOPE$15,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$15,000
UNITED WAY OF SAGINAW COUNTY$10,000
TRUSTED CHOICE RELIEF FUND (FORTIFIED)$10,000
VINA DENTAL CENTER$5,406
LOVE FOR A CHILD$5,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS MID-MICHIGAN$5,000
REBUILDING TOGETHER SHEBOYGAN COUNTY$5,000
NORTHEASTERN MICHIGAN CPCU SOCIETY$5,000
WELLSPRING LUTHERAN SERVICES$5,000
HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN INC$5,000
TENNESSEE OUT-REACH CENTER FOR HOMELESS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $140k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COOPERATIVE MINISTRY: $3k → 16%CRISTO REY COMMUNITY CENTER: $2k → 9%FIRST DAY SHOE FUND: $2k → 12%NORTHERN LIGHTS YMCA: $2k → 13%DICKINSON IRON COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $3k → 13%WEST MIDLAND FAMILY CENTER: $2k → 19%THE WOMEN'S CENTER: $5k → 5%GOLDEN HOUSE INC: $1k → 10%YWCA ROCK COUNTY: $1k → 10%CHRISTINE ANN DOMESTIC ABUSE SERVICE INC: $3k → 11%RAINBOW HOUSE DOMESTIC ABUSE SERVICES INC: $3k → 12%FOUNDATION HOUSE MINISTRIES: $2k → 13%TENNESSEE OUT-REACH CENTER FOR HOMELESS: $5k → 13%INTERFAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $3k → 8%THE I-58 MISSION INC: $3k → 8%NORTH FULTON COMMUNITY CHARITIES: $3k → 13%EASTERSEALS JOLIET REGION INC: $2k → 7%ENVISION UNLIMITED: $2k → 14%PEORIA RESCUE MINISTRIES: $3k → 14%NEW HAMPSHIRE FOOD BANK: $3k → 7%MONTGOMERY AREA COUNCIL ON AGING (MACOA): $2k → 18%THE WOMEN'S CENTER: $3k → 5%CHRISTINE ANN DOMESTIC ABUSE SERVICE INC: $3k → 11%FOUNDATION HOUSE MINISTRIES: $2k → 13%CATHOLIC CHARITIES SOUTHWESTERN OHIO: $3k → 16%MARIE WILKINSON FOOD PANTRY: $2k → 8%NEW HAMPSHIRE FOOD BANK: $2k → 7%THE WOMEN'S CENTER: $3k → 5%MAKE-A-WISH MIDDLE TENNESSEE: $2k → 14%NORTH KENT CONNECT: $2k → 11%THE WOMEN'S CENTER: $2k → 5%WHALEY CHILDREN'S CENTER: $2k → 16%CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC DIOCESE OF MADISON: $5k → 10%WESTERVILLE AREA RESOURCE MINISTRY: $2k → 15%WHALEY CHILDREN'S CENTER: $2k → 16%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF MADISON: $3k → 10%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN INC: $5k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC DIOCESE OF MADISON: $3k → 10%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN INC: $3k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF MADISON: $2k → 10%TONI AND TRISH HOUSE: $2k → 14%WELLSPRING LUTHERAN SERVICES: $5k → 18%CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES OF SAGINAW COUNTY: $10k → 18%UNDERGROUND RAILROAD: $5k → 18%UNDERGROUND RAILROAD: $5k → 18%UNDERGROUND RAILROAD INC: $2k → 18%UNDERGROUND RAILROAD INC: $2k → 18%HIDDEN HARVEST: $2k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NH
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
IN
OH
PA
CT
NE
KY
VA
MD
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$760k · 60 repeat orgs$637k to everyone else

60 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2024, 37 since wound down; 67 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

60
113

Total granted

$760k
$394k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+26%

Still filing today

72%
66%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $242k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHealthHousing & ShelterEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NM
    NAMIC MUTUAL INSURANCE FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2023 · $20k · revenue +123%
  • UR
    UNDERGROUND RAILROAD INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $14k · revenue +24%
  • Feeding America
    3× · 2022–2024 · $13k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • GS
    GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • OC
    OLIVET COLLEGE - ALPHA ALPHA CHAPTER
    one grant, 2020 · $33k
  • SV
    SAGINAW VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +40%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County

Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County D/B/A Catholic Charities Washtenaw County provides diverse, holistic social services including adoption and pregnancy counseling, food and basic needs assistance, domestic and child abuse…

—
2
New Hope Services Inc

Provide services in response to individual need

Human Services
3
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
4
Nourishing Hope

Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.

—
5
Goodwill Industries of Northern Il and Wi Stateline Area Inc

The mission of goodwill is to create opportunities for individuals with barriers to enhance their lives. barriers include physical or mental disabilities, lack of education and job preparation, socio-economic disadvantages, and others.…

—
6
Goodwill Industries of South Central Wisconsin Inc

Goodwill of south central wisconsin's mission is to help people in our community to live, work and thrive through housing, employment and supportive services. see schedule o for continuationsupported employment and job skills training are…

Employment
7
Community & Home Supports Inc

Community & home supports, inc. was founded to help people and communities address poverty and homelessness. we strive to fulfill our purpose by developing, leading, and participating in collaborative and innovative efforts that support…

Human Services
8
Family Promise of the Chippewa Valley Inc

Advocate for and support families who are homeless in our community by providing temporary housing and support services, and by fostering independence.

Human Services
9
Decatur Cooperative Ministry Inc

Decatur cooperative ministry helps families facing homelessness settle into safe, stable homes and build healthy lives filled with peace, hope and opportunity.

—
10
Second Harvest Foodbank of North Central Ohio

To grow hope in our region by creating pathways to nutritious food.

Food & Nutrition
11
Choices of Manistee County Inc

Choices of manistee county, inc. provides emergency shelter, crisis intervention, counseling, advocacy, and education to survivors of domestic violence in manistee county, empowering survivors to achieve safety and self-determination.

Human Services
12
Central Illinois Foodbank Inc

The Foodbank's mission is to provide food, and develop awareness of and creative solutions for food insecurity. Annually, the Foodbank distributes approximately 9.5 million pounds of food to 130 food pantries, soup kitchens, children's…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Westerville Area Resource Ministry; the most unlike its peers is Del and Jean Doyle Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

167 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 167 of the 241 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
34
Early backer (in before they grew)
166/167
Grantees still filing
109/167
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY: $100,000 · OtherEASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITYGEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · OtherGEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITYOLIVET COLLEGE - ALPHA ALPHA CHAPTER: $32,500 · OtherMICHIGAN INSURANCE HALL OF FAME: $27,500 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS: $26,000 · OtherFILMNORTH: $25,000 · Other+105 more: $373,354 · Other+105 moreUNITED WAY OF SAGINAW COUNTY: $180,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF SA…FRIENDS OF FOSTER KIDS: $7,000 · Philanthropy+3 more: $10,500 · PhilanthropyCOVENANT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $100,000 · HealthCOVENANT HE…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $10,000 · HealthAMERICAN CA…CROSSROADS COUNSELING MINISTRIES: $9,284 · HealthCROSSROADS …ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $8,000 · HealthST JUDE CHI…LIFECLINIC COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $5,500 · Health+6 more: $10,700 · Health+6 moreUNDERGROUND RAILROAD INC: $14,000 · Human ServicesUNDERGROUND…CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC DIOCESE OF MADISON: $12,500 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CH…THE WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $12,500 · Human ServicesTHE WOMEN'S…Child & Family Service of Saginaw: $10,000 · Human ServicesChild & Fam…Hospice of Michigan Inc: $7,500 · Human ServicesHospice of …CHRISTINE ANN DOMESTIC ABUSE SERVICES INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesTENNESSEE OUT-REACH CENTER FOR HOMELESS: $5,000 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN CHILD & FAMILY SERVICE OF MICHIGAN INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesNew Hampshire Catholic Charities: $4,500 · Human Services+26 more: $57,600 · Human Services+26 moreGeorgia State University Foundation Inc: $50,000 · EducationGeorgia St…SAGINAW VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $30,000 · EducationSAGINAW VA…NAMIC MUTUAL INSURANCE FOUNDATION: $20,000 · EducationNAMIC MUTU…OLIVET COLLEGE: $7,500 · EducationOLIVET COL…Michigan Colleges Alliance: $4,500 · Education+5 more: $10,500 · Education+5 moreHARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK: $15,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $13,440 · Food & NutritionFEED THE KIDS COLUMBUS INC: $9,500 · Food & NutritionFood Bank of Eastern Michigan: $7,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST INDIANA INC: $4,500 · Food & NutritionAMERICA'S SECOND HARVEST OF COASTAL GEORGIA INC: $4,500 · Food & NutritionVERMONT FOODBANK: $4,500 · Food & NutritionFull Tummy Project of Covington County: $4,500 · Food & NutritionGood Shepherd Food Bank: $4,500 · Food & NutritionHAND2HAND: $4,000 · Food & NutritionLIFECARE ALLIANCE: $4,000 · Food & NutritionThe Community Table Inc: $3,500 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF SOUTHERN WI: $3,000 · Food & Nutrition+3 more: $5,360 · Food & NutritionHOME REPAIR SERVICES OF KENT COUNTY INC: $6,000 · Housing & ShelterRescue Ministries of Mid-Michigan: $6,000 · Housing & ShelterKEYSTONE PLACE INC: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterBREAD OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC: $4,500 · Housing & ShelterPILLARS INC: $4,500 · Housing & ShelterSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $4,000 · Housing & ShelterPASSAGE HOME INC: $2,500 · Housing & ShelterBEDS 4 KIDS: $2,500 · Housing & ShelterWINCHESTER AREA TEMPORARY THERMAL SHELTER INC: $2,500 · Housing & ShelterCHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS: $2,500 · Housing & ShelterHome of the Sparrow Inc: $2,000 · Housing & ShelterFAYETTEVILLE AREA OPERATION INASMUCH: $2,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$634,354Philanthropy$197,500Health$143,484Human Services$133,600Education$122,500Food & Nutrition$87,300Housing & Shelter$44,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF SAGINAW COUNTY: $180,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetCOVENANT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetGeorgia State University Foundation Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAGINAW VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFILMNORTH: $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetNAMIC MUTUAL INSURANCE FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 4y, 4.7% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNDERGROUND RAILROAD INC: $14,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFeeding America: $13,440 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYPSILANTI MEALS ON WHEELS: $12,568 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC DIOCESE OF MADISON: $12,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $12,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM SOCIETY OF AMERICA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetChild & Family Service of Saginaw: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFEED THE KIDS COLUMBUS INC: $9,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetCROSSROADS COUNSELING MINISTRIES: $9,284 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetWELLSPRING INTERFAITH SOCIAL SERVICES INC: $8,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOLIVET COLLEGE: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHospice of Michigan Inc: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF FOSTER KIDS: $7,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFood Bank of Eastern Michigan: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOME REPAIR SERVICES OF KENT COUNTY INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVISTA MARIA: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRescue Ministries of Mid-Michigan: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLIFECLINIC COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $5,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFOOD GATHERERS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTINE ANN DOMESTIC ABUSE SERVICES INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budget42STRONG: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetFood Bank Council of Michigan Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTENNESSEE OUT-REACH CENTER FOR HOMELESS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLUTHERAN CHILD & FAMILY SERVICE OF MICHIGAN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEYSTONE PLACE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRebuilding Together Sheboygan Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetCOMMUNITY HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST INDIANA INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNew Hampshire Catholic Charities: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FLINT DIAPER BANK INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetBREAD OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICA'S SECOND HARVEST OF COASTAL GEORGIA INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF EAST TENNESSEE: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVERMONT FOODBANK: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMichigan Colleges Alliance: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFull Tummy Project of Covington County: $4,500 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetGood Shepherd Food Bank: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPILLARS INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Consumers Energy Foun…Wallace & Irene Bronn…Saginaw Community Fou…Wickson-Link Memorial…Bay Area Community Fo…Community Foundation …Harry a and Margaret …Harvey Randall Wickes…Frank N Andersen Foun…Allen E & Marie A Nic…Gougeon Employees Fou…Boutell Memorial Fund
Consumers Energy FoundationMI47.4× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Consumers Energy Foundation · Wallace & Irene Bronner Family Charitable Foundation · Saginaw Community Foundation · Wickson-Link Memorial Foundation · Bay Area Community Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Harry a and Margaret D Towsley Foundation · Harvey Randall Wickes Foundation · Frank N Andersen Foundation · Allen E & Marie A Nickless Memorial Foundation · Gougeon Employees Foundation · Boutell Memorial Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Frankenmuth Insurance Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Frankenmuth Insurance Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Vermont Foodbank: 13% of income from government
  • Autism Society of America Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • The Vermont Community Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
63report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Frankenmuth Insurance Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Frankenmuth Insurance Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 241 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Frankenmuth Insurance’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home