Skip to content

· Private foundation

Frank W Veden Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$535k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$105k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.5MPublic Benefit$1.2MCommunity Improvement$570kEducation$514kArts & Culture$504kHuman Services$499kAnimals$124kHousing & Shelter$85kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $105k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $430k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
APPLE TREE DENTAL$105,000
A PLACE TO BELONG$100,000
PIONEER HOME FOUNDATION$100,000
ALEXANDRIA AREA YMCA$75,000
WEST CENTRAL INITIATIVE$50,000
FERGUS FALLS CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC$30,000
CITY OF FERGUS FALLS$25,100
MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY$25,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $300k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ALEXANDRIA AREA YMCA: $75k → 9%FERGUS FALLS AREA FAMILY YMCA: $100k → 9%A PLACE TO BELONG: $100k → 9%A PLACE TO BELONG: $20k → 9%A PLACE TO BELONG: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.0M · 13 repeat orgs$718k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
22

Total granted

$4.0M
$643k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+4%

Still filing today

69%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationAnimalsCommunity ImprovementHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AT
    APPLE TREE DENTAL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +88%
  • FF
    FERGUS FALLS CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $210k · revenue +57%
  • MH
    MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    8× · 2017–2025 · $195k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • FF
    FERGUS FALLS LIBRARY
    one grant, 2017 · $125k
  • FF
    FERGUS FALLS AREA FAMILY YMCA
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue -2%
  • LL
    LRHC LONG TERM CARE FACILITIES INC
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +15%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pioneer Home Inc

Our Mission is to promote quality of life in a Christ-like way for those we serve by providing diverse and holistic care, focusing always on individual dignity and worth.

—
2
Cokato Charitable Trust

The purpose of Cokato Charitable Trust division is to provide quality health and housing services that enhance the quality of life and maintain a maximum level of functioning for our residents.

—
3
Bear Creek Development Center Inc

Bear Creek Development Center was established by Bear Creek Christian Church to create innovative, holistic, and truly affordable housing solutions with families and individuals in the Rochester MN area.

—
4
Family Promise in Anoka County

Family Promise in Anoka County (FPAC) empowers families experiencing housing insecurity to build a foundation of lasting independence.

Human Services
5
Welcome House Inc

The Welcome House is a non-profit, sober living, recovery program (incorporated in 1971) with the sole purpose of educating and rehabilitating the adult male alcoholic/ addict and the expressed mission of returning the individual to…

Health
6
Habitat for Humanity of Prairie Lakes

To create decent and affordable housing for those in need and to make decent shelter a matter of conscience with people everywhere.

—
7
Cedar Falls Historical Society

Engaging the community in the preservation, education and celebration of our heritage.

—
8
Watertown Lutheran Senior Housing Inc

To share christ's love as we serve the spiritual, physical, intellectual and emotional needs of people entrusted to our care and others whose lives we touch.

—
9
The Foundation for Health Care Continuums

The mission of the foundation for health care continuums is to strengthen each community we serve by providing a wide spectrum of housing and health care services that honor the evolving, aging population.

Health
10
Waukesha County Historical Society & Museum Inc

The museum is an educational institution dedicated to preserving the history and culture of waukesha county.

—
11
Dubuque County Historical Society

To inspire stewardship by creating educational experiences where history and rivers come alive.

Arts & Culture
12
DeKalb Area Retirement Center

A faith based not-for-profit community serving seniors 62 years of age and older through a continuum of services enhancing an individuals quality of life.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fergus Falls Area Family Ymca; the most unlike its peers is Friends and Allies Project Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
13/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

APPLE TREE DENTAL: $1,374,700 · OtherAPPLE TREE DENTALCITY OF FERGUS FALLS: $1,175,100 · OtherCITY OF FERGUS FALLSPioneer Home Foundation: $125,000 · OtherFERGUS FALLS LIBRARY: $125,000 · Other+22 more: $546,443 · Other+22 moreFERGUS FALLS CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $210,000 · Arts & CultureFERGUS FAL…MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $195,000 · Arts & CultureMINNESOTA …KADDATZ GALLERIES LTD: $81,000 · Arts & CultureKADDATZ GA…+1 more: $8,450 · Arts & CultureWEST CENTRAL INITIATIVE: $460,000 · PhilanthropyWEST CENTR…FERGUS AREA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $300,000 · EducationA PLACE TO BELONG: $125,000 · Human ServicesFERGUS FALLS AREA FAMILY YMCA: $100,000 · Human ServicesAlexandria Area Young Men's Christian Association: $75,000 · Human ServicesHUMANE SOCIETY OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY: $124,000 · AnimalsGREATER FERGUS FALLS CORP: $110,000 · Community Improvement
Other$3,346,243Arts & Culture$494,450Philanthropy$460,000Education$300,000Human Services$300,000Animals$124,000Community Improvement$110,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAPPLE TREE DENTAL: $1,374,700 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetWEST CENTRAL INITIATIVE: $460,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetFERGUS AREA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $300,000 over 3y, 31% of budgetFERGUS FALLS CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $210,000 over 6y, 15% of budgetMINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $195,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPioneer Home Foundation: $125,000 over 2y, 96% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY: $124,000 over 5y, 6.7% of budgetGREATER FERGUS FALLS CORP: $110,000 over 2y, 25% of budgetFERGUS FALLS AREA FAMILY YMCA: $100,000 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetLRHC LONG TERM CARE FACILITIES INC: $100,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetKADDATZ GALLERIES LTD: $81,000 over 4y, 8.8% of budgetAlexandria Area Young Men's Christian Association: $75,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSOUL PURPOSE MINISTRIES: $15,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetI-94 BMX INC: $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetFERGUS FALLS AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetOTTER TAIL COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetTHE WELCOME HOUSE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds APPLE TREE DENTAL ↗
  • Who funds WEST CENTRAL INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds FERGUS AREA COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FERGUS FALLS CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Pioneer Home Foundation ↗
  • Who funds A PLACE TO BELONG ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds GREATER FERGUS FALLS CORP ↗
  • Who funds FERGUS FALLS AREA FAMILY YMCA ↗
  • Who funds LRHC LONG TERM CARE FACILITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds KADDATZ GALLERIES LTD ↗
  • Who funds Alexandria Area Young Men's Christian Association ↗
  • Who funds SOUL PURPOSE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS AND ALLIES PROJECT CORP ↗
  • Who funds I-94 BMX INC ↗
  • Who funds FERGUS FALLS AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds OTTER TAIL COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE WELCOME HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds PROSPECT HOUSE AND CIVIL WAR MUSEUM ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Otter Tail Power Company FoundationMN36.7× affinity15 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Otter Tail Power Company Foundation · West Central Initiative · Roger L & Agnes C Dell Charitable Trust · The Lundeen Foundation · Otter Tail Corporation Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Lake Region Arts Council · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Frank W Veden Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Frank W Veden Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Frank W Veden Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Frank W Veden Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Frank W Veden’s filings →

    More from the funding graph