Skip to content

· Private foundation

Frank R and Elizabeth Simoni Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$536k
Granted FY2024still arriving
28
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$137k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.1MEducation$543kPublic Safety & Disaster$73kReligion$69kYouth Development$67kHousing & Shelter$65kCrime & Legal$56kPublic Benefit$55kOther$0
02FY2024 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k16 grants · $84k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $215k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $237k
$8,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$9.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRIGHAM WOMAN'S HOSPITAL$137,044
DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE$100,000
PRESIDENT FELLOWSHIP OF HARVARD COL$40,000
XAVERIAN BROTHERS HIGH SCHOOL$35,000
HOUSING FORWARD - MA$35,000
ROXBURY LATIN SCHOOL$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
FDNY FIRE FAMILY TRANSPORT$20,000
MILTON ACADEMY$15,000
ST OSCAR ROMERO PARISH$10,000
REVERE SONS HERITAGE SITE$10,000
THE CAM NEELY FOUNDATION$10,000
CANTON POLICE DEPARTMENT$8,500
MORRILL MEM LIBRARY LITERACY PROGRA$8,000
CANTON FIRE DEPARTMENT$7,215
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 66% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YOUNG LIFE: $10k → 7%HOLY CROSS FAMILY MINISTRIES: $10k → 11%BRIGHAM WOMAN'S HOSPITAL: $200k → 16%FDNY FIRE FAMILY TRANSPORT: $20k → 20%BRIGHAM WOMAN'S HOSPITAL: $137k → 16%FDNY FIRE FAMILY TRANSPORT: $10k → 20%BRIGHAM WOMAN'S HOSPITAL: $70k → 16%MILTON ACADEMY: $15k → 7%BRIGHAM WOMAN'S HOSPITAL: $50k → 16%MILTON ACADEMY: $10k → 7%BRIGHAM WOMAN'S HOSPITAL: $50k → 16%PRESIDENT FELLOWSHIP OF HARVARD COL: $40k → 8%BRIGHAM WOMAN'S HOSPITAL: $10k → 16%BRIGHAM WOMAN'S HOSPITAL: $10k → 16%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $30k → 8%ROXBURY LATIN SCHOOL: $40k → 16%ROXBURY LATIN SCHOOL: $20k → 16%XAVERIAN BROTHERS HIGH SCHOOL: $45k → 7%ROXBURY LATIN SCHOOL: $18k → 16%XAVERIAN BROTHERS HIGH SCHOOL: $35k → 7%ROXBURY LATIN SCHOOL: $18k → 16%XAVERIAN BROTHERS HIGH SCHOOL: $35k → 7%ROXBURY LATIN SCHOOL: $18k → 16%XAVERIAN BROTHERS HIGH SCHOOL: $20k → 7%ROXBURY LATIN SCHOOL: $18k → 16%XAVERIAN BROTHERS HIGH SCHOOL: $20k → 7%ROXBURY LATIN SCHOOL: $13k → 16%XAVERIAN BROTHERS HIGH SCHOOL: $20k → 7%XAVERIAN BROTHERS HIGH SCHOOL: $20k → 7%TOWN OF CANTON: $10k → 7%REVERE SONS HERITAGE SITE: $10k → 7%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $100k → 16%ST OSCAR ROMERO PARISH: $10k → 7%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $100k → 16%CANTON POLICE DEPARTMENT: $10k → 7%BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT: $20k → 16%ST OSCAR ROMERO PARISH: $10k → 7%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $100k → 16%BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT: $20k → 16%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $91k → 16%BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT: $15k → 16%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $50k → 16%BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT: $15k → 16%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $50k → 16%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $50k → 16%ABUNDANT HOUSING MA: $30k → 16%TOWN OF NORWOOD: $25k → 7%HOUSING FORWARD - MA: $35k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 28 repeat orgs$210k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against -7% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
14

Total granted

$2.1M
$108k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
-7%

Still filing today

29%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $102k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyReligionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    7× · 2017–2024 · $541k · revenue +162%
  • TR
    THE ROXBURY LATIN SCHOOL
    7× · 2017–2024 · $143k · revenue +33%
  • RB
    Ron Burton Training Village Inc
    7× · 2017–2024 · $35k · revenue +447%

Funded once

  • AH
    Abundant Housing MA Incgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue +58%
  • TO
    TOWN OF NORWOOD
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • HC
    HOLY CROSS FAMILY MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dean College

Dean college is a private, residential new england college grounded in a culture and tradition that all students deserve the opportunity to discover and exceed their greatest aspirations. a personal and transformative community since 1865,…

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
5
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
6
The Williston Northampton School

The williston northampton school inspires students to live with purpose, passion and integrity. the school's philosophy comprises the tenents of respect for self and others, responsibility and trust, and honesty and integrity. the school's…

Education
7
Emmanuel College

Emmanuel college is a coed, residential catholic liberal arts and sciences college with 2,112 undergraduate and graduate students.

Education
8
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
9
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
10
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
11
Northeastern University
Education
12
Ocean State Cancer Crushers
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life; the most unlike its peers is We Beat Cancer. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BRIGHAM WOMAN'S HOSPITAL: $527,044 · OtherBRIGHAM WOMAN'S HOSPITALXAVERIAN BROTHERS HIGH SCHOOL: $195,000 · OtherXAVERIAN BROTHERS HIGH SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $90,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMORRILL MEM LIBRARY LITERACY PROGRA: $53,000 · OtherCANTON FIRE DEPARTMENT: $49,768 · Other+33 more: $572,640 · Other+33 moreDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $541,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institu…+1 more: $10,000 · HealthTHE ROXBURY LATIN SCHOOL: $142,500 · EducationTHE ROXBU…President and Fellows of Harvard College: $30,000 · EducationPresident…MILTON ACADEMY: $25,000 · EducationMILTON AC…+1 more: $6,000 · EducationNORTH COUNTRY MISSION OF HOPE: $37,000 · ReligionHOUSING FORWARD-MA INC: $35,000 · Housing & ShelterYOUNG LIFE: $32,000 · Youth DevelopmentWe Beat Cancer: $1,000 · PhilanthropyTEAM RUBICON INC: $500 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$1,487,452Health$551,000Education$203,500Religion$37,000Housing & Shelter$35,000Youth Development$32,000Philanthropy$1,000Public Safety & Disaster$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $541,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROXBURY LATIN SCHOOL: $142,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH COUNTRY MISSION OF HOPE: $37,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetHOUSING FORWARD-MA INC: $35,000 over 1y, 44% of budgetRon Burton Training Village Inc: $35,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $32,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAbundant Housing MA Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetMILTON ACADEMY: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CAMERON M NEELY FOUNDATION FOR CANCER CARE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetGROTON SCHOOL: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWOMENS COMMUNITY COMMITTEE INC: $3,500 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE ROXBURY LATIN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds NORTH COUNTRY MISSION OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds HOUSING FORWARD-MA INC ↗
  • Who funds Ron Burton Training Village Inc ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds Abundant Housing MA Inc ↗
  • Who funds MILTON ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ↗
  • Who funds THE CAMERON M NEELY FOUNDATION FOR CANCER CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds GROTON SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Frank R and Elizabeth Simoni Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Frank R and Elizabeth Simoni Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Milton Academy: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Frank R and Elizabeth Simoni Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Frank R and Elizabeth Simoni Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Frank R and Elizabeth Simoni’s filings →

More from the funding graph