· Public charity
Franciscan Foundation
As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 3 grants below total $3,564,881 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,706,575 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $141,694 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $50k–250k1 grant · $53k
- $250k+2 grants · $3.5M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FRANCISCAN HEALTH SYSTEM | $2,789,453 |
| HARRISON MEDICAL CENTER | $722,622 |
| MERCY FOUNDATION INC | $52,806 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $258k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
24 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $53k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CWCOMMONSPIRIT WASHINGTON F/K/A FRANCISCAN HEALTH SYSTEM9× · 2017–2025 · $17M · revenue +35%
- CWCOMMONSPIRIT WASHINGTON COMMUNITY CARE F/K/A HARRISON MEDICAL CENTER4× · 2021–2025 · $2.6M · revenue +30%
- FMFRANCISCAN MEDICAL GROUP6× · 2017–2024 · $2.4M · revenue +10%
Funded once
- PLPacific Lutheran Universityone grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +2%
- BPBELLARMINE PREPARATORY SCHOOLone grant, 2018 · $25k
- LTL'ARCHE TAHOMA HOPE COMMUNITYgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +45%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Strengthening the community by providing accessible and affordable health care.
To empower families experiencing housing insecurity through intervention, prevention,and stabilization services.
To provide food to individuals in need with compassion, dignity and respect. No one needing assistance is turned away.
Improving the quality of life for the people in the Olympic Peninsula Community by providing increased access to health and wellness services for the underserved
To advance the health of our population by eliminating health disparities including promoting equitable access to high quality and cost effective health and human services and resources, to prevent disease and improve health, to improve…
Project Access Northwest provides low-income families access to medical, dental and Behavioral Health care so they can live a healthier and more productive life.
The mission of columbia valley community health is partnering to achieve optimal health and wellness with compassion and respect for all.
Network services has been serving homeless families in the puget sound area since 1990, with a focus on families with children. network services aims to break the cycle of homelessness by providing assistance to families with children to…
To provide the highest quality health care with compassionate and accessible service for all including comprehensive primary medical, dental and behavioral health care through a clinic system.
Tenino Community Service Center/Tenino Food Bank Plus is a deep-rooted community-based service center dedicated to feeding those within the Tenino school district (Tenino and Bucoda) that may be disadvantaged. In addition, it is our…
The Community Foundation of Snohomish County (the Foundation) is a nonprofit, tax-exempt organization incorporated under the laws of the State of Washington. The Foundation serves as a community foundation, supporting a broad spectrum of…
Community health center of snohomish county (chc) provides our diverse communities with access to high quality, affordable primary health care.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Community Services of Western Washington and the most unlike its peers is Center for Multicutural Health. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMONSPIRIT WASHINGTON F/K/A FRANCISCAN HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
- Who funds COMMONSPIRIT WASHINGTON COMMUNITY CARE F/K/A HARRISON MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds FRANCISCAN MEDICAL GROUP ↗
- Who funds ENUMCLAW REGIONAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds STEP BY STEP FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER ↗
- Who funds MERCY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF WESTERN WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds SOUTH SOUND OUTREACH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds THE CAROL MILGARD BREAST CENTER ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF PENINSULA ↗
- Who funds NW FURNITURE BANK ↗
- Who funds SAFE STREETS CAMPAIGN ↗
- Who funds EMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK OF TACOMA AND PIERCE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds HILLTOP ARTISTS IN RESIDENCE ↗
- Who funds CATHERINE PLACE ↗
- Who funds THE RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds Pierce County Project Access ↗
- Who funds Pacific Lutheran University ↗
- Who funds L'ARCHE TAHOMA HOPE COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds Tacoma Community House ↗
- Who funds THE COFFEE OASIS ↗
- Who funds LINDQUIST DENTAL CLINIC FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN VIEW COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds GREENTRIKE ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR TACOMA STUDENTS ↗
- Who funds SOUTH KITSAP HELPLINE ↗
- Who funds Pierce County Aids Foundation ↗
- Who funds RENTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RAINIER FOOTHILLS WELLNESS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ARK INSTITUTE OF LEARNING ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST INFANT SURVIVAL ALLIANCE SIDS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MERCY HOUSING NORTHWEST ↗
- Who funds THE MUSTARD SEED PROJECT OF KEY PENINSULA ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds PARTICULAR COUNCIL OF TACOMA SOCIETY OF SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL ↗
- Who funds GREATER TACOMA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL O ↗
- Who funds NEW PHOEBE HOUSE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Tacoma Community Foundation · Woodworth Family Foundation · Multicare Health System · Fuchsg & M Fdn Tai · Gary E Milgard Family Foundation- Sunshine · The Bamford Foundation · Kilworth Florence Char Tr Fndn · The Norcliffe Foundation · Sequoia Foundation · Heidner Marco J Char Trust · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Names Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Franciscan Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.