Skip to content

· Private foundation

Francis R & Ruth E Oberreich Foundation Corporation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$109k
Granted FY2024still arriving
34
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$174kArts & Culture$79kYouth Development$65kEducation$60kReligion$59kHuman Services$57kHealth$40kCrime & Legal$36kOther$0
02FY2024 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k33 grants · $79k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
$1,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KINGSTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY$30,000
LION'S FOUNDATION$8,840
FOND DU LAC COUNTY$8,500
MARIAN UNIVERSITY$5,640
Individual grant recipient$5,600
FONDY FOOD PANTRY$5,500
THE BEACON HOUSE$5,000
PRINCETON SENIOR CENTER$5,000
PRINCETON HISTORICAL SOCIETY$5,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF AMERICA$5,000
FOND DU LAC SYMPHONIC BAND$2,500
SHOP WITH A COP$2,500
THE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE TRI-COUNTY AREA$2,500
COPS FOR KIDS FOUNDATION$2,500
GREEN LAKE FESTIVAL OF MUSIC$2,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SOLUTIONS CENTER: $2k → 9%PILLAR & VINE: $100 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$472k · 38 repeat orgs$208k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

38 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
61

Total granted

$472k
$139k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+9%

Still filing today

32%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $68k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    FONDY FOOD PANTRY
    3× · 2021–2024 · $16k · revenue +77%
  • TA
    THE ARC FOND DU LAC INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $15k · revenue +20%
  • GL
    GREEN LAKE FESTIVAL OF MUSIC INC
    3× · 2020–2024 · $12k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $17k
  • CO
    CITY OF FOND DU LAC
    one grant, 2020 · $14k
  • CC
    CROSSWAYS CAMPING MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Door County Land Trust Inc

The door county land trust is a local, non-governmental non-profit organization whose mission is to preserve door county's exceptional lands and waters forever.

Environment
2
Wisconsin Maritime Museum Inc

The wisconsin maritime museum connects all people with wisconsin's waterways, by engaging and educating the public about wisconsin's maritime history, wisconsin's world war ii submarines, uss cobia, and the great lakes. the wisconsin…

Arts & Culture
3
Southern Lakes Credit Union

We will stirve to make a significant difference in improving the quality of life of our members and the communities we serve by providing affordable access to credit and financial services.

—
4
Landmark Conservancy Inc

Landmark conservancy is a nationally accredited, nonprofit conservation organization serving 20 counties across northwest wisconsin. their mission is to conserve wisconsin's natural legacy for everyone...forever.

Environment
5
Wisconsin's Green Fire Incorporated

Advance science-informed analysis and policy solutions that address wisconsin's greatest conservation challenges.

Environment
6
Friends of Wisconsin State Parks Inc

To preserve, promote, protect, and enhance wisconsin state parks, forests, trails, and recreation areas.

Recreation & Sports
7
Disability Rights Wisconsin Inc

Legal protection and advocacy to protect the rights of people with disabilities in wisconsin.

—
8
Envision Greater Fond Du Lac Inc

The mission of envision greater fond du lac, inc. is to inspire our community to work in partnership and cultivate a vibrant economic future.

—
9
Pharmacy Society of Wisconsin Inc

Provide a unified voice, resources, and leadership to advance the pharmacy profession and improve the quality of medication use in wisconsin.

—
10
Madison Professional Police Officers Association Inc

The madison professional police officers association represents law enforcement professionals who serve the city of madison, wisconsin, as either police officers, detectives, investigators, or sergeants.

—
11
Oshkosh Convention & Visitors Bureau Inc

To promote oshkosh and winnebago county a premier destination for corporate, sports, and leisure groups and individual visitors.

—
12
Wisconsin Association of Lakes Inc

The mission of the wisconsin association of lakes is to conserve, enhance, and restore wisconsin's 15,000 lakes to ensure their sustainability for the benefit and collective use and enjoyment for this and future generations.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Easter Seals Wisconsin Inc; the most unlike its peers is Markesan Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 113 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/37
Grantees still filing
24/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KINGSTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $30,000 · OtherKINGSTON HISTORICAL SOCIETYST JOHN THE BAPTIST CATHOLIC CHURCH: $29,150 · OtherST JOHN THE BAPTIST CATHOLIC CHURCHMANCHESTER ACTIVITY CENTER INC: $22,870 · OtherMANCHESTER ACTIVITY CENTER INCFOND DU LAC COUNTY SHERIFF: $21,294 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $17,000 · OtherMARKESAN DISTRICT SCHOOLS: $16,150 · OtherFONDY FOOD PANTRY: $15,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $15,100 · Other+86 more: $260,658 · Other+86 moreGREEN LAKE GREENWAYS: $150,000 · Recreation & SportsGREEN LAKE GREENWAYSSPECIAL OLYMPICS WISCONSIN INC: $7,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $2,000 · Recreation & SportsMARIAN UNIVERSITY INC: $21,790 · EducationFRIENDS OF THE BRANDON PUBLIC LIBRARY INC: $5,000 · EducationVALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC THOMPSON: $4,300 · EducationFOND DU LAC SYMPHONIC BAND LTD: $15,000 · Arts & CultureGREEN LAKE FESTIVAL OF MUSIC INC: $11,650 · Arts & CultureMAGNUM OPUS INC: $1,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $250 · Arts & CultureTHE ARC FOND DU LAC INC: $15,250 · HealthCARE 4 U INC: $5,000 · HealthEASTER SEALS WISCONSIN INC: $1,960 · Health+1 more: $500 · HealthBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE TRI-COUNTY AREA: $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentCOPS FOR KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · Youth Development4-H CLUBS & AFFILIATED 4-H ORGANIZATIONS: $1,400 · Youth DevelopmentBADGER BOYS STATE INCORPORATED: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentMARKESAN FIRE DEPARTMENT: $3,500 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$427,722Recreation & Sports$159,000Education$31,090Arts & Culture$27,900Health$22,710Youth Development$7,400Public Safety & Disaster$3,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREEN LAKE GREENWAYS: $150,000 over 3y, 29% of budgetMARIAN UNIVERSITY INC: $21,790 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFONDY FOOD PANTRY: $15,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE ARC FOND DU LAC INC: $15,250 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFOND DU LAC SYMPHONIC BAND LTD: $15,000 over 4y, 4.6% of budgetGREEN LAKE FESTIVAL OF MUSIC INC: $11,650 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS WISCONSIN INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE BRANDON PUBLIC LIBRARY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCARE 4 U INC: $5,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetVALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC THOMPSON: $4,300 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMARKESAN FIRE DEPARTMENT: $3,500 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFISHING HAS NO BOUNDARIES INC: $2,600 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE TRI-COUNTY AREA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOPS FOR KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetINDIANAPOLIS MOTOR SPEEDWAY FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOPHIA TRANSFORMATIVE LEADERSHIP PARTNERS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetBLUE LINE HOCKEY CLUB INCORPORATED: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEASTER SEALS WISCONSIN INC: $1,960 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOLUTIONS CENTER INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMISSIONS OF HONOR INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTAILS FOR LIFE INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget4-H CLUBS & AFFILIATED 4-H ORGANIZATIONS: $1,400 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARKESAN HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $1,239 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetPatriot Riders of America WI Chapter 2: $1,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMARKESAN RESIDENT HOME INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR RIPON MEDICAL CENTER INC: $250 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWISCONSIN LIONS FOUNDATION INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPILLAR & VINE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILLIS CHAPEL POST 306 AMERICAN LEGION: $50 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $15 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDefenders of Wildlife: $15 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREEN LAKE GREENWAYS ↗
  • Who funds MARIAN UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds FONDY FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC FOND DU LAC INC ↗
  • Who funds FOND DU LAC SYMPHONIC BAND LTD ↗
  • Who funds GREEN LAKE FESTIVAL OF MUSIC INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE BRANDON PUBLIC LIBRARY INC ↗
  • Who funds CARE 4 U INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Green Bay Packers FoundationWI30.1× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Green Bay Packers Foundation · Fond Du Lac Area Foundation · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Mid-States Aluminum Foundation Inc · Michels Family Foundation · Grande Foundation · Oshkosh Area Community Foundation Corporation · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Patrick & Marysue Michels Family Foundation · Webster Foundation Inc · Agnesian Healthcare Inc · Mike Shannon Automotive Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Francis R & Ruth E Oberreich Foundation Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Francis R & Ruth E Oberreich Foundation Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Francis R & Ruth E Oberreich Foundation Corporation?

    Find your warmest path to Francis R & Ruth E Oberreich Foundation Corporation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 113 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Francis R & Ruth E Oberreich’s filings →

    More from the funding graph