Skip to content

· Private foundation

Frances S Jordan Charitable Trust Xxxxx1009

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$134k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$645kHuman Services$235kAnimals$117kCommunity Improvement$47kEducation$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $85k
$7,075
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INDIANA MASONIC HOME FDN INC$28,302
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$28,302
SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN$28,302
INDPLS ZOO & ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY$7,075
BUTLER UNIVERSITY BUSINESS OFFICE$7,075
RILEY HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN$7,075
Individual grant recipient$7,075
CROSSROADS REHABILITATION CENTER$7,075
HUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS$7,075
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$7,075
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 81% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $6k → 16%RUSHVILLE DAR CHAPTER: $7k → 12%CROSSROADS REHABILITATION CENTER: $7k → 16%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $6k → 16%RUSHVILLE DAR CHAPTER: $7k → 12%CROSSROADS REHABILITATION CENTER: $7k → 16%RUSHVILLE DAR CHAPTER: $7k → 12%CROSSROADS REHABILITATION CENTER: $7k → 16%RUSHVILLE DAR CHAPTER: $7k → 12%CROSSROADS REHABILITATION CENTER: $7k → 16%RUSHVILLE DAR CHAPTER: $6k → 12%CROSSROADS REHABILITATION CENTER: $6k → 16%RUSHVILLE DAR CHAPTER: $6k → 12%CROSSROADS REHABILITATION CENTER: $6k → 16%RUSHVILLE DAR CHAPTER: $6k → 12%CROSSROADS REHABILITATION CENTER: $6k → 16%RUSHVILLE DAR CHAPTER: $6k → 12%CROSSROADS REHABILITATION CENTER: $6k → 16%RUSHVILLE DAR CHAPTER: $6k → 12%CROSSROADS REHABILITATION CENTER: $6k → 16%HUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS: $7k → 16%HUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS: $7k → 16%HUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS: $7k → 16%HUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS: $7k → 16%HUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS: $6k → 16%HUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS: $6k → 16%HUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS: $6k → 16%HUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS: $6k → 16%HUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS: $6k → 16%INDPLS ZOO & ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $7k → 16%INDPLS ZOO & ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $7k → 16%INDPLS ZOO & ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $7k → 16%INDPLS ZOO & ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $7k → 16%INDPLS ZOO & ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $6k → 16%INDPLS ZOO & ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $6k → 16%INDPLS ZOO & ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $6k → 16%INDPLS ZOO & ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $6k → 16%INDPLS ZOO & ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $6k → 16%BUTLER UNIVERSITY BUSINESS OFFICE: $7k → 16%BUTLER UNIVERSITY BUSINESS OFFICE: $7k → 16%BUTLER UNIVERSITY BUSINESS OFFICE: $7k → 16%BUTLER UNIVERSITY BUSINESS OFFICE: $7k → 16%BUTLER UNIVERSITY BUSINESS OFFICE: $6k → 16%BUTLER UNIVERSITY BUSINESS OFFICE: $6k → 16%BUTLER UNIVERSITY BUSINESS OFFICE: $6k → 16%BUTLER UNIVERSITY: $6k → 16%BUTLER UNIVERSITY: $6k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 11 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
0

Total granted

$1.1M
$0

Still filing today

55%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IM
    INDIANA MASONIC HOME FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $235k · revenue +6%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $228k · revenue +33%
  • CR
    CROSSROADS REHABILITATION CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $59k · revenue +71%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    04the grantee network

    6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    6/6
    Grantees still filing
    5/6
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $240,735 · HealthTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDRENAmerican Heart Association Inc: $228,322 · HealthAmerican Heart Association IncCROSSROADS REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $58,630 · HealthCROSSROADS REHABILITATION CENTER INCINDPLS ZOO & ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $58,630 · OtherINDPLS ZOO & ZOOLOGICAL SOCI…RILEY HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $58,630 · OtherRILEY HOSPITAL FOR CHILDRENAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $58,630 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETYIndividual grant recipient: $58,630 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBUTLER UNIVERSITY BUSINESS OFFICE: $46,979 · OtherBUTLER UNIVERSITY BUSINESS O…INDIANA MASONIC HOME FOUNDATION INC: $234,529 · Human ServicesINDIANA MASONIC HOME FO…HUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS: $58,630 · AnimalsButler University: $11,651 · Education
    Health$527,687Other$281,499Human Services$234,529Animals$58,630Education$11,651

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $240,735 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetINDIANA MASONIC HOME FOUNDATION INC: $234,529 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $228,322 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCROSSROADS REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $58,630 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS: $58,630 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetButler University: $11,651 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
    • Who funds INDIANA MASONIC HOME FOUNDATION INC ↗
    • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
    • Who funds CROSSROADS REHABILITATION CENTER INC ↗
    • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS ↗
    • Who funds Butler University ↗

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Frances S Jordan Charitable Trust Xxxxx1009 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Frances S Jordan Charitable Trust Xxxxx1009. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
    • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Frances S Jordan Charitable Trust Xxxxx1009’s filings →

    More from the funding graph