Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Frances S Jordan Charitable Trust Xxxxx1009

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$134k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$645kHuman Services$235kAnimals$117kCommunity Improvement$47kEducation$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $85k
$7,075
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INDIANA MASONIC HOME FDN INC$28,302
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$28,302
SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN$28,302
INDPLS ZOO & ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY$7,075
BUTLER UNIVERSITY BUSINESS OFFICE$7,075
RILEY HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN$7,075
Individual grant recipient$7,075
CROSSROADS REHABILITATION CENTER$7,075
HUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS$7,075
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$7,075
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 81% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $6k → 16%RUSHVILLE DAR CHAPTER: $7k → 12%CROSSROADS REHABILITATION CENTER: $7k → 16%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $6k → 16%RUSHVILLE DAR CHAPTER: $7k → 12%CROSSROADS REHABILITATION CENTER: $7k → 16%RUSHVILLE DAR CHAPTER: $7k → 12%CROSSROADS REHABILITATION CENTER: $7k → 16%RUSHVILLE DAR CHAPTER: $7k → 12%CROSSROADS REHABILITATION CENTER: $7k → 16%RUSHVILLE DAR CHAPTER: $6k → 12%CROSSROADS REHABILITATION CENTER: $6k → 16%RUSHVILLE DAR CHAPTER: $6k → 12%CROSSROADS REHABILITATION CENTER: $6k → 16%RUSHVILLE DAR CHAPTER: $6k → 12%CROSSROADS REHABILITATION CENTER: $6k → 16%RUSHVILLE DAR CHAPTER: $6k → 12%CROSSROADS REHABILITATION CENTER: $6k → 16%RUSHVILLE DAR CHAPTER: $6k → 12%CROSSROADS REHABILITATION CENTER: $6k → 16%HUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS: $7k → 16%HUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS: $7k → 16%HUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS: $7k → 16%HUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS: $7k → 16%HUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS: $6k → 16%HUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS: $6k → 16%HUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS: $6k → 16%HUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS: $6k → 16%HUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS: $6k → 16%INDPLS ZOO & ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $7k → 16%INDPLS ZOO & ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $7k → 16%INDPLS ZOO & ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $7k → 16%INDPLS ZOO & ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $7k → 16%INDPLS ZOO & ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $6k → 16%INDPLS ZOO & ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $6k → 16%INDPLS ZOO & ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $6k → 16%INDPLS ZOO & ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $6k → 16%INDPLS ZOO & ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $6k → 16%BUTLER UNIVERSITY BUSINESS OFFICE: $7k → 16%BUTLER UNIVERSITY BUSINESS OFFICE: $7k → 16%BUTLER UNIVERSITY BUSINESS OFFICE: $7k → 16%BUTLER UNIVERSITY BUSINESS OFFICE: $7k → 16%BUTLER UNIVERSITY BUSINESS OFFICE: $6k → 16%BUTLER UNIVERSITY BUSINESS OFFICE: $6k → 16%BUTLER UNIVERSITY BUSINESS OFFICE: $6k → 16%BUTLER UNIVERSITY: $6k → 16%BUTLER UNIVERSITY: $6k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 11 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
0

Total granted

$1.1M
$0

Still filing today

55%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IM
    INDIANA MASONIC HOME FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $235k · revenue +6%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $228k · revenue +33%
  • CR
    CROSSROADS REHABILITATION CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $59k · revenue +71%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field
    04the grantee network

    6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    6/6
    Grantees still filing
    5/6
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN — $240,735 · HealthTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDRENAmerican Heart Association Inc — $228,322 · HealthAmerican Heart Association IncCROSSROADS REHABILITATION CENTER INC — $58,630 · HealthCROSSROADS REHABILITATION CENTER INCINDPLS ZOO & ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $58,630 · OtherINDPLS ZOO & ZOOLOGICAL SOCI…RILEY HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN — $58,630 · OtherRILEY HOSPITAL FOR CHILDRENAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY — $58,630 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETYIndividual grant recipient — $58,630 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBUTLER UNIVERSITY BUSINESS OFFICE — $46,979 · OtherBUTLER UNIVERSITY BUSINESS O…INDIANA MASONIC HOME FOUNDATION INC — $234,529 · Human ServicesINDIANA MASONIC HOME FO…HUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS — $58,630 · AnimalsButler University — $11,651 · Education
    Health$527,687Other$281,499Human Services$234,529Animals$58,630Education$11,651

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN — $240,735 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetINDIANA MASONIC HOME FOUNDATION INC — $234,529 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $228,322 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCROSSROADS REHABILITATION CENTER INC — $58,630 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS — $58,630 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetButler University — $11,651 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN
    • Who funds INDIANA MASONIC HOME FOUNDATION INC
    • Who funds American Heart Association Inc
    • Who funds CROSSROADS REHABILITATION CENTER INC
    • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS
    • Who funds Butler University

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Frances S Jordan Charitable Trust Xxxxx1009 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 6%
    • The Shriners' Hospital for Children6% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph