Skip to content
Fox Rock Foundation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Private foundation

Fox Rock Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$81k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$10.0MEducation$7.0MAnimals$5.0MYouth Development$4.3MPhilanthropy$4.2MHuman Services$3.3MHousing & Shelter$2.5MRecreation & Sports$2.2MOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$124k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMONWEALTH ZOOLOGICAL CORP DBA ZOO NEW ENGLAND$25,000
DOVE$10,000
QUIN IMPACT FUND$10,000
NORWELL HISTORICAL SOCIETY$6,497
DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE$5,700
ROSIES PLACE$5,000
WESTPORT LAND CONSERVATION TRUST$5,000
THE RICKY KING FOUNDATION INC$5,000
PLAY FOR PINK$2,000
BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$2,000
THE GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK$1,000
BAY COLONY DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARS$1,000
BRIGHAM & WOMEN'S HOSPITAL$1,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT$518
GO2 FOR LUNG CANCER$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $1.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 11% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JUBILEE PARK: $100k → 14%SOUTH SHORE STARS: $1.0M → 7%WOMANADE INC: $5k → 8%WOMANADE INC: $250 → 8%WOMANADE INC: $100 → 8%THIS STAR WON'T GO OUT: $500k → 7%SOUTH SHORE YMCA: $107k → 8%EMPOWER HER: $50k → 8%SOUTH SHORE YMCA: $6k → 8%EMPOWER HER: $5k → 8%EMPOWER HER: $5k → 8%EMPOWER HER: $4k → 8%SOUTH SHORE YMCA: $500 → 8%SOUTH SHORE YMCA: $500 → 8%COMMUNITY SERVINGS INC: $100k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NH
IL
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
PA
CT
RI
CA
CO
NE
VA
MD
TN
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

31%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$16M · 36 repeat orgs$35M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

36 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
118

Total granted

$16M
$35M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+17%

Still filing today

61%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthAnimalsHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NEW ENGLAND WILDLIFE CENTER INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $1.3M · revenue ×15 · 28% of their budget
  • THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $1.1M · revenue +40%
  • AF
    ARTISTS FOR HUMANITY INC
    4× · 2017–2022 · $1.0M · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • FC
    FIDELITY CHARITABLE - ROB & KAREN HALE DAF
    one grant, 2017 · $1.6M
  • RB
    Ron Burton Training Village Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1.1M · revenue +50%
  • FH
    FRIENDSHIP HOME OF LINCOLN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1.0M · revenue +33%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
4
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
5
Mass General Brigham Health Plan Inc

Mass general brigham health plan's mission is to promote the health and wellness of our members, and to help ensure equitable, affordbale health care for the diverse communities we serve.

Health
6
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
7
Brighton Marine Inc

Brighton marine, inc. provides military and veteran families with comprehensive campus-based quality health care, as well as affordable and supportive housing for at-risk veterans and their families.

Health
8
Mcphs University

Mcphs university prepares students for careers in health care through teaching, scholarship, research, professional service and community engagement.

Education
9
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
10
Dean College

Dean college is a private, residential new england college grounded in a culture and tradition that all students deserve the opportunity to discover and exceed their greatest aspirations. a personal and transformative community since 1865,…

Education
11
Bmc Affiliated Physicians Inc

Boston university affiliated physicians, inc.'s (buap) primary mission is to provide health care services in a manner that promotes health for the benefit of the community, to perform medical and clinical research in the public interest,…

—
12
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fenway Community Health Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Foundation to Combat Anti-Semitism Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

94 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 94 of the 163 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

9
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
94/94
Grantees still filing
64/94
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIDELITY CHARITABLE - ROB & KAREN HALE DAF: $1,619,165 · OtherFIDELITY CHARITABLE - ROB & KAREN HALE DAFHINGHAM CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH: $1,111,000 · OtherRon Burton Training Village Inc: $1,078,499 · OtherKERRY JON WALKER FUND: $1,054,147 · OtherDOVE INC: $1,050,570 · OtherWONDERFUND: $1,036,892 · OtherSHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST: $1,004,200 · OtherCOREY C GIFFIN FOUNDATION: $1,001,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,000,000 · OtherROXBURY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1,000,000 · OtherTHE FISH WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 · OtherHOME BASE: $1,000,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $1,000,000 · OtherLAWRENCE CATHOLIC ACADEMY OF LAWRENCE MASSACHUSETTS INC: $1,000,000 · OtherFRANCISCAN CHILDRENS: $1,000,000 · OtherQUINCY MUSEUMADAMS PRESIDENTIAL CENTER AND FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 · OtherWELLSPRING INC: $1,000,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DORCHESTER INC: $1,012,625 · OtherARTISTS FOR HUMANITY INC: $1,047,600 · OtherTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $1,128,955 · OtherEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $1,000,000 · OtherRAZOM INC: $1,000,000 · OtherTHE LIGHT FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 · OtherSAFE HOUSE PROJECT INC: $1,000,000 · Other+86 more: $4,728,811 · Other+86 moreDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $1,032,700 · HealthDana-Farber …JETT FOUNDATION INC: $1,010,000 · HealthJETT FOUNDAT…JOE ANDRUZZI FOUNDATION INC: $1,000,843 · HealthJOE ANDRUZZI…BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION: $1,000,000 · HealthBOSTON MEDIC…ELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION INC: $967,934 · HealthELTON JOHN A…FENWAY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $500,000 · HealthFENWAY COMMU…+7 more: $210,394 · HealthTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $1,023,500 · EducationTRUSTEES OF…YEAR UP INC: $1,000,000 · EducationYEAR UP INCCATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $1,000,000 · EducationCATHOLIC SC…DENVER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $997,707 · EducationDENVER SCHO…UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS FOUNDATION INC: $500,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY …+11 more: $406,188 · Education+11 moreFRIENDSHIP HOME OF LINCOLN INC: $1,032,052 · Human ServicesSOUTH SHORE STARS INC: $1,000,000 · Human ServicesTHIS STAR WON'T GO OUT INC: $500,000 · Human ServicesSouth Shore Young Men's Christian Association: $113,500 · Human ServicesJUBILEE PARK & COMMUNITY CENTER CORPORATION: $100,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY SERVINGS INC: $100,000 · Human Services+2 more: $68,850 · Human ServicesNEW ENGLAND WILDLIFE CENTER INC: $1,337,000 · AnimalsSAVE THE MANATEE CLUB INC: $1,000,000 · AnimalsQuincy Animal Shelter Inc: $100,000 · AnimalsBLUES BRIDGE INC: $100,000 · AnimalsPATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INC: $100,000 · AnimalsBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC: $100,000 · Animals+2 more: $25,150 · AnimalsHARLEM LACROSSE AND LEADERSHIP CORPORATION: $1,005,000 · Recreation & SportsINNERCITY WEIGHTLIFTING INC: $1,000,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE KITA CENTERINC: $250,000 · Recreation & SportsPROJECT DEEP INC: $100,000 · Recreation & Sports+2 more: $25,030 · Recreation & SportsTREVOR PROJECT INC: $1,000,000 · Civil RightsFOUNDATION TO COMBAT ANTI-SEMITISM INC: $1,000,000 · Civil Rights
Other$29,873,464Health$5,721,871Education$4,927,395Human Services$2,914,402Animals$2,762,150Recreation & Sports$2,380,030Civil Rights$2,000,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW ENGLAND WILDLIFE CENTER INC: $1,337,000 over 7y, 28% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $1,128,955 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetRon Burton Training Village Inc: $1,078,499 over 1y, 11% of budgetARTISTS FOR HUMANITY INC: $1,047,600 over 4y, 12% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $1,032,700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDSHIP HOME OF LINCOLN INC: $1,032,052 over 1y, 25% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $1,023,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DORCHESTER INC: $1,012,625 over 2y, 8.5% of budgetJETT FOUNDATION INC: $1,010,000 over 2y, 28% of budgetHARLEM LACROSSE AND LEADERSHIP CORPORATION: $1,005,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetJOE ANDRUZZI FOUNDATION INC: $1,000,843 over 1y, 20% of budgetRAZOM INC: $1,000,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION: $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LIGHT FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 over 1y, 32% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $1,000,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetSOUTH SHORE STARS INC: $1,000,000 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetSAVE THE MANATEE CLUB INC: $1,000,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $1,000,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetFOUNDATION TO COMBAT ANTI-SEMITISM INC: $1,000,000 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetINNERCITY WEIGHTLIFTING INC: $1,000,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetYEAR UP INC: $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $1,000,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetSAFE HOUSE PROJECT INC: $1,000,000 over 1y, 45% of budgetDENVER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $997,707 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION: $980,099 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION INC: $967,934 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetFENWAY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $500,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetY2Y NETWORK INC: $500,000 over 1y, 42% of budgetTHIS STAR WON'T GO OUT INC: $500,000 over 1y, 86% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS FOUNDATION INC: $500,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE KITA CENTERINC: $250,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetSUNSHINE FARM SANCTUARY INC: $150,000 over 1y, 58% of budgetPOCUMTUCK VALLEY MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION: $135,000 over 4y, 7.2% of budgetSouth Shore Young Men's Christian Association: $113,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetQuincy Animal Shelter Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetBLUES BRIDGE INC: $100,000 over 1y, 73% of budgetCOACHING FOR CHANGE INC: $100,000 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetJUBILEE PARK & COMMUNITY CENTER CORPORATION: $100,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetECPAT-USA INC: $100,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetPATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INC: $100,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetAMERICA'S HOMETOWN THANKSGIVING INC: $100,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetTHE SPORTS MUSEUM OF NEW ENGLAND INC: $100,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVINGS INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE HERREN PROJECT: $100,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $97,900 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSMITH COUNTY CHAMPIONS FOR CHILDREN INC: $73,000 over 1y, 16% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND WILDLIFE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Ron Burton Training Village Inc ↗
  • Who funds ARTISTS FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP HOME OF LINCOLN INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DORCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds JETT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HARLEM LACROSSE AND LEADERSHIP CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds JOE ANDRUZZI FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RAZOM INC ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE LIGHT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH SHORE STARS INC ↗
  • Who funds SAVE THE MANATEE CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION TO COMBAT ANTI-SEMITISM INC ↗
  • Who funds INNERCITY WEIGHTLIFTING INC ↗
  • Who funds YEAR UP INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HOUSE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds DENVER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eastern Bank Foundati…Boston Foundation IncRockland Trust Charit…Arbella Insurance Fou…American Tower Corpor…Cummings Foundation G…GivenGain Foundation …Liberty Mutual Founda…United Way Of Massach…Yawkey Foundation IIRockland Trust - Blue…Fiduciary Charitable …
Eastern Bank FoundationMA37.1× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eastern Bank Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · Arbella Insurance Foundation · American Tower Corporation Foundation Inc · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · GivenGain Foundation USA · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · Yawkey Foundation II · Rockland Trust - Blue Hills Charitable Foundation · Fiduciary Charitable Foundation Dba Fiduciary Trust Charitable

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fox Rock Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fox Rock Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 330%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • South Shore Stars Inc: 54% of income from government
  • Fenway Community Health Center Inc: 27% of income from government
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation: 23% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Community Servings Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Clubs of Dorchester Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Coaching for Change Inc: 5% of income from government
  • The Sports Museum of New England Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College: 3% of income from government
  • Artists for Humanity Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Clubs of Boston Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Commonwealth Zoological Corporation D/B/a Zoo New England: 2% of income from government
  • Appalachian Mountain Club: 1% of income from government
  • Lawyers for Civil Rights Inc: 1% of income from government
  • New England Wildlife Center Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
  • Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Year Up Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
33get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Fox Rock Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Fox Rock Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 163 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fox Rock’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home