Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Four Chickens Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$44k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212024.

Education$30kHealth$26kYouth Development$21kHuman Services$1k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$518
Median grant
4
States reached
$54k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHRISTOPHER REEVE FOUNDATION$25,000
NY ISLANDERS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$7,125
MARIST COLLEGE$6,250
SCOPE$4,500
HELPUSADOPTORG$518
BIKE TO THE BEACH$270
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$250
FRIENDS OF KAREN$165
DONORS CHOOSE$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 79% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%NY ISLANDERS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $7k → 6%SCOPE: $5k → 7%MARIST COLLEGE: $12k → 9%FRIENDS OF KAREN: $165 → 9%SCOPE: $5k → 13%DONORS CHOOSE: $6k → 17%BIKE TO THE BEACH: $270 → 14%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $250 → 17%CHRISTOPHER REEVE FOUNDATION: $25k → 16%SCOPE: $5k → 7%MARIST COLLEGE: $6k → 9%DONORS CHOOSE: $5k → 17%DONORS CHOOSE: $710 → 17%DONORS CHOOSE: $100 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$45k · 4 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
1

Total granted

$45k
$260

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 26% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    MARIST UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $18k · revenue +19%
  • SC
    SUMMER CAMP OPPORTUNITIES PROMOTE EDUCATION INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $14k · revenue +155%
  • HI
    HELPUSADOPTORG INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $1k · revenue +321%

Funded once

  • SK
    SG KOMEN FOR THE CURE
    one grant, 2022 · $260

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
2
The Children's Cancer Cause Inc

The mission of children's cancer cause is to champion policies and programs that improve the lives of children with cancer and survivors.

Health
3
All Children's Research Institute Inc

The corporation is organized and is operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes. all children's research institute supports, encourages, and engages in and conducts medical research and other research in…

Health
4
Children's Tumor Foundation

Our mission: drive research, expand knowledge, and advance care for the nf community. our vision: end nf.

Health
5
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
The Kids of Nyu Foundation

The KiDS of NYU Foundation, Inc. (the Organization / KiDS) is a voluntary organization of parents, physicians and friends who support children's services at NYU medical Center through philanthropy, community service and advocacy. KiDS…

Health
7
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
8
The Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma Research Foundation

The adenoid cystic carcinoma research foundation (accrf) supports research into adenoid cystic carcinoma that will accelerate the development of improved therapies and a cure for the disease.

Health
9
Childrens Cancer Therapy Development Institute

To make all childhood cancers universally survivable by delivering new treatments to clinical trials through scientific discovery.

10
Solving Kids' Cancer Inc

Skc impacts children through the initiation of clinical research trials of investigative treatment strategies. our vision is to continue expanding the armamentarium of effective and less toxic treartment strategies for pediatric…

Health
11
Oncology and Kids Inc

To help kids and families heal the emotional scars of childhood cancer and learn to thrive.

Human Services
12
Kate Amato Foundation Inc

Kate amato foundation is dedicated to finding safer, more effective treatments for children with cancer by fundraising to support innovative research that accelerates the pace of progress and saves young lives.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of Karen Inc and the most unlike its peers is Helpusadoptorg Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MARIST UNIVERSITY — $18,250 · EducationMARIST UNIVERSITYDONORSCHOOSEORG — $11,543 · EducationDONORSCHOOSEORGCHRISTOPHER REEVE FOUNDATION — $25,000 · HealthCHRISTOPHER REEVE FOUNDATION+2 more — $415 · HealthSUMMER CAMP OPPORTUNITIES PROMOTE EDUCATION INC — $14,000 · Youth DevelopmentSUMMER CAMP OPPORTUN…ISLANDERS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC — $7,125 · PhilanthropyISLANDERS …HELPUSADOPTORG INC — $1,018 · Human ServicesTHE ADD IMPACT NETWORK INC — $270 · Recreation & SportsSG KOMEN FOR THE CURE — $260 · Other
Education$29,793Health$25,415Youth Development$14,000Philanthropy$7,125Human Services$1,018Recreation & Sports$270Other$260

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHRISTOPHER REEVE FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARIST UNIVERSITY — $18,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSUMMER CAMP OPPORTUNITIES PROMOTE EDUCATION INC — $14,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG — $11,543 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetISLANDERS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC — $7,125 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHELPUSADOPTORG INC — $1,018 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ADD IMPACT NETWORK INC — $270 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF KAREN INC — $165 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Four Chickens Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 49%
  • Christopher Reeve Foundation49% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Four Chickens Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Four Chickens Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph