Skip to content

Illinois · Public charity

Foundation for Women's Cancer

To support and empower all affected by gynecologic cancers through education, research, and public awareness.

$638k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
12
Grants FY2024
9
Organizations funded FY2023
78%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$50,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$100,000
Organizations funded a year
6 to 12
FY2018 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
9
Total assets, FY2024
$8.6M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 78% of the organizations Foundation for Women's Cancer funded were first-time grantees, receiving 68% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $375k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’21’22’23
EducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving10$580k30%
FY20239$550k78%
FY20226$400k50%
FY202112$625k75%
FY20197$265k71%
FY20186$293kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$3.2M

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
IA
PA
CA
MO
MD
TN
NC
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2018 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Utmd Anderson$542,5008n/a
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center$275,00050%
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill$155,0002n/a
Unc Health Foundation Inc$100,00010%
Baylor College of Medicine$100,00020%
Emory University$100,00020%
The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois$100,0001n/a
The George Washington University$100,00020%
Washington University$100,00030%
Mass General Brigham Incorporated$100,0002n/a
Show all 33 grantees
All grantees of Foundation for Women's Cancer by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Utmd Anderson$542,5008n/a
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center$275,00050%
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill$155,0002n/a
Unc Health Foundation Inc$100,00010%
Baylor College of Medicine$100,00020%
Emory University$100,00020%
The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois$100,0001n/a
The George Washington University$100,00020%
Washington University$100,00030%
Mass General Brigham Incorporated$100,0002n/a
City of Hope$75,00010%
Duke University$75,00020%
University of Oklahoma$75,0002n/a
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston$50,0001n/a
University of Alabama at Birmingham$50,0002n/a
Vanderbilt University Medical Center$50,00010%
University of Pittsburgh$50,00020%
Fox Chase Cancer Center Foundation$50,00011%
New York University School of Medicine Veba Trust$50,00011%
Drexel University$50,00010%
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc$50,00010%
Mass General Brigham Incorporated$50,0001n/a
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center$50,0002n/a
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center$50,00010%
Wake Forest University Health Sciences$50,00010%
University of Chicago$50,00010%
Society of Gynecologic Oncology$30,00010%
Montefiore Medical Center$25,00010%
State University of Iowa$25,0001n/a
State University of Iowa Foundation$25,00010%
University of Maryland College Park$25,0001n/a
University of Illinois$25,0001n/a
Johns Hopkins University$10,00010%

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Foundation for Women's Cancer supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center: $275,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUnc Health Foundation Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWashington University: $100,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCity of Hope: $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDuke University: $75,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University Medical Center: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Pittsburgh: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFox Chase Cancer Center Foundation: $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNew York University School of Medicine Veba Trust: $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetDrexel University: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCedars-Sinai Medical Center: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWake Forest University Health Sciences: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSociety of Gynecologic Oncology: $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMontefiore Medical Center: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetState University of Iowa Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJohns Hopkins University: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 21.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mary Kay Ash FoundationTX13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mary Kay Ash Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Foundation for Women's Cancer with peer funders

About Foundation for Women's Cancer

How much does Foundation for Women's Cancer give?
Foundation for Women's Cancer reported 12 grants totaling $637,500 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 6 and 12 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2023.
What does Foundation for Women's Cancer fund?
By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2024, its largest causes are Health (100%).
Who are Foundation for Women's Cancer's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2018 to FY2024: Utmd Anderson ($543k), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center ($275k), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill ($155k).
Does Foundation for Women's Cancer fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 78% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Foundation for Women's Cancer?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Mary Kay Ash Foundation, National Philanthropic Trust.
Where is Foundation for Women's Cancer based?
Foundation for Women's Cancer is based in IL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Foundation for Women's Cancer’s filings →

More from the funding graph