Skip to content

· Public charity

Foundation for Wellness Fna Womans Foundation Inc

The corporation is organized and is operated exclusively for charitable, scientific and educational purposes relating to the promotion of the total well-being of women and their families, including in furtherance of such purposes, the providing of such services to the general public and medical professionals in such areas as pre-natal…

$65k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$120kHuman Services$93kHealth$29kFood & Nutrition$11kHousing & Shelter$11kCrime & Legal$10kPhilanthropy$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $58k
$22,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAITH HOUSE$35,000
Individual grant recipient$22,500
LSUE FOUNDATION$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $93k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 18%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 18%FAITH HOUSE: $35k → 17%FAITH HOUSE: $17k → 17%FAITH HOUSE: $12k → 17%FAITH HOUSE: $11k → 17%FAITH HOUSE: $7k → 17%THE FAMILY TREE OF ACADIANA: $7k → 17%HOSPICE OF ACADIANA FOUNDATIO: $7k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$200k · 3 repeat orgs$96k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +61% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
7

Total granted

$200k
$74k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+38%

Still filing today

33%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationFood & NutritionCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FH
    Faith House Inc
    5× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +61%
  • UF
    UL FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2023 · $73k
  • LF
    LSUE FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $48k

Funded once

  • HA
    HEALTH AND EDUCATION ALLIANCE OF LOUISIANAgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $23k · revenue +38%
  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA
    one grant, 2021 · $11k · revenue -47%
  • FP
    Family Promise of Acadiana Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $11k · revenue +18%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Capital Area Alliance for the Homeless

The Capital Area Alliance for the Homeless (CAAH) holds the fundamental belief that everyone, no matter how deprived in circumstances of housing and necessities is valued, entitled to dignity and respect, and deserving of community…

Community Improvement
2
New Orleans Family Justice Alliance

The organization is a partnership of agencies dedicated to ending family violence, child abuse, sexual assault, and stalking through prevention and coordinated response by providing comprehensive client-centered, empowerment services in a…

Human Services
3
Acadiana Outreach Center Inc

Acadiana outreach center, inc. provides shelter and support to help the poor and homeless rebuild their lives.

Religion
4
Childrens Advocacy Center - Hope House

To provide a child-oriented, multidisciplinary forensice interview enviroment facility and counseling center for victims of abuse and their families.

Civil Rights
5
Louisiana Alliance for Nonprofits

To strengthen, promote, and build the capacity of louisiana's nonprofit sector through education, advocacy, and member services.

Philanthropy
6
Louisiana Baptist Childrens Home and Family Ministries

To provide love, care, and a positive christian witness for children and families in need.

—
7
Louisiana Coalition Against Domestic Violence Inc

The Organization is dedicated to bringing about change in institutions, laws, politics, attitudes, and beliefs which will allow individuals to live free of violence.

—
8
Foodnet of Lafayette Louisiana

The organizaton operates a food bank for the needy popupation of lafayette parish, louisiana. food is distributed to needy families who have been referred to the organization by churches, shelter, and other non-profit agencies.

—
9
Child Advocacy Services Inc

Child advocacy services gives voice, healing, and security to children in ten parishes in southeast louisiana through its casa program, children's advocacy program, and prevention education.

Civil Rights
10
Together Louisiana

Together Louisiana is a network of faith and community institutions that works to strengthen local leadership and support practical solutions to everyday challenges. Its mission focuses on helping communities work together across race…

Public Benefit
11
Feeding Louisiana

The mission of the association shall be to promote communication and interaction among members and to provide education and training programs on issues of hunger and food banking.

Food & Nutrition
12
Habitat for Humanity International Inc

To promote homeownership among dis-advantage families by renovating or building houses for sale to qualified families in the Central Louisiana area.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice of Acadiana Inc; the most unlike its peers is Community Foundation of Acadiana. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UL FOUNDATION: $72,650 · OtherUL FOUNDATIONLSUE FOUNDATION: $47,550 · OtherLSUE FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $22,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFamily Promise of Acadiana Inc: $10,790 · OtherFamily Promise of Acadiana IncCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ACADIANA INC: $6,525 · OtherFaith House Inc: $80,025 · Human ServicesFaith House IncHOSPICE OF ACADIANA INC: $6,525 · Human ServicesHOSPICE OF ACADIANA INCTHE FAMILY TREE INFORMATION EDUCATION AND COUNSELING CENTER IN: $6,525 · Human ServicesTHE FAMILY TREE INFORMATION EDUCAT…HEALTH AND EDUCATION ALLIANCE OF LOUISIANA: $22,500 · EducationSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA: $11,000 · Food & NutritionHEARTS OF HOPE: $10,074 · Crime & LegalCommunity Foundation of Acadiana: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$160,015Human Services$93,075Education$22,500Food & Nutrition$11,000Crime & Legal$10,074Philanthropy$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFaith House Inc: $80,025 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetHEALTH AND EDUCATION ALLIANCE OF LOUISIANA: $22,500 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA: $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFamily Promise of Acadiana Inc: $10,790 over 1y, 12% of budgetHEARTS OF HOPE: $10,074 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCommunity Foundation of Acadiana: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF ACADIANA INC: $6,525 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FAMILY TREE INFORMATION EDUCATION AND COUNSELING CENTER IN: $6,525 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Haynie Family FoundationLA17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Haynie Family Foundation · Community Foundation of Acadiana · The Rucks Family Foundation · United Way of Acadiana Inc · Mills Family Foundation Inc · Florence Mauboules Charitable Trust · Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Louisiana Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Foundation for Wellness Fna Womans Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Foundation for Wellness Fna Womans Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Foundation for Wellness Fna Womans’ filings →

    More from the funding graph