Skip to content
Foundation for Educating Children With Autism Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Foundation for Educating Children With Autism Inc

Please refer to schedule o

$80k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Employment$644kHealth$198kAnimals$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kHuman Services$10kInternational$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $74,250, the rows itemized in this filing. The $79,750 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $5,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$967k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SELECT HUMAN SERVICES$30,000
MOUTH TO HAND LEARNING CENTER$20,000
THE NICHOLAS CENTER$14,250
AUTISM SCIENCE FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 5%SPARC INC: $8k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$789k · 5 repeat orgs$118k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
6

Total granted

$789k
$98k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+15%

Still filing today

80%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SELECT HUMAN SERVICES INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $75k · revenue +22%
  • NC
    NICHOLAS CENTER LTD
    2× · 2024–2025 · $24k · revenue +10%
  • AS
    AUTISM SCIENCE FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $20k · revenue +110%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $35k
  • AS
    AUTISM SCIENCE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • HL
    HOLISTIC LEARNING CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nysarc Inc New York City Chapter

We are committed to helping people with intellectual (cont. on schedule o) and developmental disabilities to live full lives.

Human Services
2
Center for Developmental Disabilities

The center's mission is to help children and adults with differing abilities achieve their dreams by overcoming barriers to living, working, learning & enjoying recreational opportunities in the community of their choice.

Human Services
3
Eden Ii School for Autistic Children

The mission of eden ii programs is to support people with autism throughout their lives to achieve their full potential through service, science, and passion.

Education
4
Ny Special Care Inc

Provides home-based Applied Behavior Analysis ABA services to children with autism and other developmental disabilities. Focusing on individualized treatment, caregiver training, and clinical supervision by licensed professionals. Services…

Human Services
5
Northeast Arc Inc

Helping adults and children with disabilities, (incl asd), become full participants in the community.

—
6
The Arc of Essex County Inc

The arc of essex county provides advocacy and services empowering individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families to realize a lifetime of personal achievement and full partnership in the community.

Human Services
7
Westchester School for Special Children

To provide services to children and adolescents with developmental disabilities. the school runs preschool and school age programs.

—
8
Qsac Inc

Build the capacity and skills of individuals, families, community agencies and professionals to help individuals with an autism spectrum disorder realize oppurtunities for independence, self-reliance and successful community inclusion.…

Health
9
The Child Study Center of New York

To provide a program for children with special needs, ages three to five years by utilizing the disciplines of psychology, speech therapy, occupational therapy, and physical therapy as integral functions of the educational program.

—
10
Mid-Island Y Jewish Community Center in

Provide vital services & foster jewish identity, personal growth, family strength and community. the mid-island y jcc is open to everyone in the community serving individuals of all ages, abilities, and challenges.

Human Services
11
Jewish Community Center of Schenectady Inc

Our mission is to build a vibrant, welcoming, and inclusive community that embraces our jewish values, culture, identity and connections to israel, engages the local community, and enhances the body, mind and spirit of our members.

Religion
12
Easter Seals New York Inc

We provide services so that people with disabilities can live, learn, & work in our communities.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sparc Inc; the most unlike its peers is Evny Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EVNY INC: $610,000 · HealthEVNY INC+1 more: $20,000 · HealthSELECT HUMAN SERVICES INC: $75,000 · OtherSELECT HUMAN SERVICES INCCARDINAL MCCLOSKEY SCHOOL AND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $60,000 · OtherCARDINAL MCCLOSKEY SCHOOL AND …Individual grant recipient: $35,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAUTISM SCIENCE FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherAUTISM SCIENCE FOUNDATIONMOUTH TO HAND LEARNING CENTER: $20,000 · OtherMOUTH TO HAND LEARNING CENTERHOLISTIC LEARNING CENTER: $10,000 · OtherJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ON THE HUDSON INC: $10,000 · OtherFLUTIE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherNICHOLAS CENTER LTD: $24,250 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropySPARC INC: $7,700 · Human Services
Health$630,000Other$245,000Philanthropy$34,250Human Services$7,700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEVNY INC: $610,000 over 4y, 87% of budgetCARDINAL MCCLOSKEY SCHOOL AND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $60,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNICHOLAS CENTER LTD: $24,250 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAUTISM SCIENCE FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ON THE HUDSON INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPARC INC: $7,700 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA7.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Foundation for Educating Children With Autism Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Foundation for Educating Children With Autism Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Foundation for Educating Children With Autism Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Foundation for Educating Children With Autism Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Foundation for Educating Children With Autism’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home