· Private foundation
Foundation For Community Partnership Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Remnant Life | $9,600 |
| Ronald McDonald House | $5,000 |
| Make A Wish | $5,000 |
| Habitat for Humanity | $5,000 |
| Mend Medical Services | $2,500 |
| Foundation for Public Schools | $2,500 |
| Catholic Charities | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,400 |
| Akouo Missions | $1,500 |
| Annas House Foundation | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +15% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TMTHE MESH OBJECTIVE INC5× · 2020–2025 · $22k · revenue +25%
- MFMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA INC3× · 2023–2025 · $15k · revenue +28%
- MMMEND MEDICAL SERVICES INC3× · 2023–2025 · $8k · revenue +15%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $5k
Emergency Infant Services Incone grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue -15%- IGInternational Generosity Foundationone grant, 2023 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Family Hope House empowers families through therapy, education, and advocacy. As Oklahoma's sole adoption competent mental health agency, we support foster and adoptive children for lasting stability and success.
111Tulsa exists to mobilize the local church to see that no child is without a family in Tulsa County.
Tulsa casa is organized to speak for the best interests of abused and neglected children in court. we promote and support volunteer representation for the children in an effort to provide each child a safe, permanent, nurturing home.
To serve those who are experiencing or at risk for homelessness.
To prevent child abuse and neglect through education, treatment, and advocacy. the parent child center of tulsa (pcct) has been serving the tulsa community and surrounding areas since 1990. in 2024, pcct served more than 96,000 infants,…
Poverty alleviation/homelessness prevention
Empowering the poor and transforming lives in northeast oklahoma, one guest at a time . . . since 1996.
Assist in preparing homeless and near homeless women in the skills to care for their children and enable them to move toward self-sufficiency.
The family safety center exists to promote safety and justice in tulsa county through co-located multi-disciplinary services that offer protection, hope and healing to victims of intimate partner and family violence, sexual assault,…
Our mission is to lead our community by serving people experiencing or at risk of homelessness with help, hope, and healing, in the spirit of excellence, under the call of christ.
Crossover health services (chs) envisions a christian healthcare movement where faith, strong relationships, and shared resources drive community restoration and eliminate health disparities. we believe that healthcare is a right, not a…
To improve the lives of children and youth in oklahoma's child welfare system by providing resources and building community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tulsa Dream Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Mesh Objective Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE MESH OBJECTIVE INC ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC ↗
- Who funds MEND MEDICAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds LITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Family & Childrens Services Inc ↗
- Who funds THE ANNA'S HOUSE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Emergency Infant Services Inc ↗
- Who funds IRON GATE INC ↗
- Who funds TULSA DREAM CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds A NEW LEAF INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Tulsa Community Foundation · Coretz Family Foundation · Common Bond Foundation · Edward & Helen Bartlett Foundation · Flint Family Foundation · Maxine and Jack Zarrow Family Foundation · The Sharna and Irvin Frank Foundation · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Je and le Mabee Foundation Inc · Don & Barbara Thornton Family Foundation · John W Marshall and Jerry E Marshall Foundation C/O R Blake Atkins
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Foundation For Community Partnership Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Family & Childrens Services Inc — 1% of income from government
- Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Oklahoma City Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.