Skip to content

· Private foundation

Foundation for a Better Tomorrow Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$68k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Education$55kEnvironment$40kEmployment$20kCivil Rights$20kAnimals$20kReligion$16kHealth$10kYouth Development$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $60k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$469k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRIDGES FROM SCHOOL TO WORK$10,000
DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK$10,000
THE LILLY PAD FOUNDATION$10,000
HEAVEN ON EARTH NOW INC$10,000
GLOBAL REFUGE$10,000
MISSISSIPPI EARLY LEARNING CENTER$10,000
DREXEL UNIVERSITY$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%HEAVEN ON EARTH NOW INC: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

OR
PA
NJ
CT
CO
MD
NM
NC
DC
MS
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$91k · 5 repeat orgs$130k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
8

Total granted

$91k
$80k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
0%

Still filing today

80%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 26% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
EducationReligionHealthHousing & ShelterEnvironmentAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JU
    JEWS UNITED FOR JUSTICE INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $20k · revenue +20%
  • CA
    Chief and Calla Bell Scholarship Foundation
    2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +52%
  • DU
    DREXEL UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $15k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • JF
    JACKSON FREE CLINIC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -68%
  • CP
    CHAMA PEAK LAND ALLIANCEgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +488%
  • GR
    GLOBAL REFUGE'S WELCOME CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
2
Rescape California

ReScape addresses climate change by providing a regenerative, nature-based whole systems foundation for landscaping education, workforce development and policy.Foundational to our work is a whole systems watershed framework that…

Environment
3
Claremont Lincoln University

Delivers affordable, accessible, and relevant higher education programs.

Education
4
Association of Clinical Research Professionals

Acrp promotes excellence in clinical research. we support clinical research professionals through training and development, the exchange of ideas and expertise, and certification. we serve as the preferred source for quality tools,…

Health
5
Chagrin River Watershed Partners Inc

Preserving and enhancing the scenic and environmental quality of the ecosystem of the chagrin river, lake erie and other ohio watersheds in a manner which assures a sustainable future for people, plants and animals.

Human Services
6
Compass Science Communication Inc

Compass champions, connects, and supports diverse scientist leaders to improve the well-being of people and nature.

Science & Tech
7
Center for International Environmental Law Inc

To investigate, research, write, publish, present conferences and teach with respect to global, regional, transboundary, and comparative environmental issues and to make the findings from such activities available to the general public; to…

International
8
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
9
Dazzle Africa

Dazzle africa's mission is to partner with local organizations to provide programs in conservation, education and community development. the organization aims to ensure that future generations are self-sufficient and iconic african…

Animals
10
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
11
Resource Renewal Institute

The resource renewal institute facilitates the creation, development and implementation of practical strategies to solve the entire complex environmental problem by addressing it comprehensively.

Environment
12
Climate Conservation Dba Center for Large Landscape Conservation

We bring science, policy, and proven solutions directly to communities working to restore the integrity and natural connectivity of the landscapes in which they live. (see schedule o)

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Delaware Riverkeeper Network; the most unlike its peers is Drexel University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHURCH OF ST ANDREW THE APOSTLE: $16,000 · OtherCHURCH OF ST ANDREW THE APOSTLEDELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK: $10,000 · OtherDELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORKGLOBAL REFUGE'S WELCOME CENTER: $10,000 · OtherGLOBAL REFUGE'S WELCOME CENTERLUTHERAN IMMIGRATION & REFUGEE SERVICE INC DBA GLOBAL REFUGE: $10,000 · OtherLUTHERAN IMMIGRATION & REFUGEE SERVICE INC DBA GLOBAL …CHAMA CREEK LAND ALLIANCE: $10,000 · OtherCHAMA CREEK LAND ALLIANCEOPEN SPACE: $10,000 · OtherOPEN SPACEMISSISSIPPI EARLY LEARNING CENTER: $10,000 · OtherMISSISSIPPI EARLY LEARNING CENTERBRIDGES FROM SCHOOL TO WORK: $10,000 · OtherBRIDGES FROM SCHOOL TO WORKDELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK: $10,000 · OtherDELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORKGIRLS ON THE RUN GREATER CHESAPEAKE: $10,000 · OtherGIRLS ON THE RUN GREATER CHESAPEAKEChief and Calla Bell Scholarship Foundation: $20,000 · EducationChief and Calla B…DREXEL UNIVERSITY: $15,000 · EducationDREXEL UNIVERSITYJEWS UNITED FOR JUSTICE INC: $20,000 · ReligionJEWS UNITE…THE LILY PAD FOUNDATION: $20,000 · HealthTHE LILY P…JACKSON FREE CLINIC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterCHAMA PEAK LAND ALLIANCE: $10,000 · EnvironmentHEAVEN ON EARTH NOW INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesCASCADES RAPTOR CENTER: $10,000 · Animals
Other$106,000Education$35,000Religion$20,000Health$20,000Housing & Shelter$10,000Environment$10,000Human Services$10,000Animals$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWS UNITED FOR JUSTICE INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE LILY PAD FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 6.7% of budgetChief and Calla Bell Scholarship Foundation: $20,000 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJACKSON FREE CLINIC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetCHAMA PEAK LAND ALLIANCE: $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetLUTHERAN IMMIGRATION & REFUGEE SERVICE INC DBA GLOBAL REFUGE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASCADES RAPTOR CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Foundation for a Better Tomorrow Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Foundation for a Better Tomorrow Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 100%
  • Lutheran Immigration & Refugee Service Inc Dba Global Refuge: 100% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Foundation for a Better Tomorrow Inc?

Find your warmest path to Foundation for a Better Tomorrow Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Foundation for a Better Tomorrow’s filings →

More from the funding graph