· Private foundation
Foulger Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $13k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $145k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $638k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| INTERFAITH WORKS | $133,000 |
| RISING STAR OUTREACH INC | $125,000 |
| A WIDER CIRCLE INC | $100,000 |
| BWH ANN ROMNEY CENTER NEUROLOGIC | $100,000 |
| SOME INC | $90,000 |
| THE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC | $90,000 |
| CHOC FOUNDATION | $37,500 |
| CHILDREN'S NATIONAL HOSPITAL | $37,500 |
| BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY - IDAHO | $37,484 |
| Individual grant recipient | $32,066 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND | $6,788 |
| JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY | $3,444 |
| ENSIGN COLLEGE | $1,912 |
| MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY | $754 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
US giving: 79% of grant dollars ($2.2M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 21% that went abroad ($560k) is mapped below.
Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $250k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
Beyond the US: 21% of all-years giving ($560k)
1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
How this is measured
Where the work is directed
The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.
About 5% of Foulger Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue -15% since the first grant, against -57% for those funded once.
15 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- AOASSOCIATION OF FREELANCE TEACHERS4× · 2020–2023 · $560k
- IWINTERFAITH WORKS4× · 2022–2025 · $322k · revenue +67%
- RSRising Star Outreach Inc3× · 2021–2025 · $250k · revenue -16%
Funded once
- PDPHILANTHROPIES DEPT OF LDSone grant, 2021 · $67k
- BYBRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERISTY (PHILANTHROPIES DEPT)one grant, 2023 · $59k
- CFCenter for Latter-Day Saint Arts Incone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue -57%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Foulger Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Foulger Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
- The Maryland Food Bank Inc: 11% of income from government
- A Wider Circle Inc: 6% of income from government
- Interfaith Works: 4% of income from government
How this is measured
Play a game based on Foulger Family’s filings →