Skip to content
Fosun Foundation (New York) at a glance

· Private foundation

Fosun Foundation (New York)

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$2.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$2.9MHealth$423kHuman Services$141kCommunity Improvement$90kPhilanthropy$90kSocial Science$50kInternational$45k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
  • $250k+1 grant · $2.0M
$2,000,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YALE UNIVERSITY$2,000,000
THE WEBB SCHOOLS$60,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $77k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%COMMUNITY HELP IN PARK SLOPE INC: $77k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
IA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
MD
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

20%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$755k · 3 repeat orgs$2.9M to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
25

Total granted

$755k
$944k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+41%

Still filing today

100%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 3% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TW
    THE WEBB SCHOOLS
    5× · 2021–2025 · $410k · revenue +57%
  • University of Chicago
    3× · 2021–2023 · $300k · revenue +34%
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR THE GLOBAL COMPACT
    2× · 2022–2023 · $45k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • TG
    The George Washington University
    one grant, 2019 · $150k · revenue +23%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF ESSEX & WEST HUDSON D/B/A UNITED WAY OF GREATER NEWARK
    one grant, 2020 · $90k · revenue -66%
  • AF
    ALLIANCE FOR DOWNTOWN NEW YORK INC
    one grant, 2020 · $90k · revenue +1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital

The mission of robert wood johnson university hospital is to improve the health and well-being of the patients and communities we serve by fostering an environment of excellence in all areas including the provision of the highest quality,…

Health
2
Community Medical Center

The organization, a not-for-profit acute care hospital serving the ocean county region, is committed to enhancing the overall health status of the community by providing the highest quality healthcare and related services including…

Health
3
Monmouth Medical Center

To meet the healthcare needs of our community by providing cost-effective quality care. to educate present and future generations of healthcare providers. to provide a continuum of regional tertiary care. please refer to the organization's…

Health
4
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
5
Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital Rahway

To deliver safe, quality, cost effective healthcare services, providing access and value to the community through a unified effort that meets individual needs with dignity and respect. through its dynamic, strategic partnerships, robert…

Health
6
Saint Barnabas Medical Center

Saint barnabas medical center, a non-sectarian healthcare institution, will pursue the delivery of primary, secondary, and tertiary health services while consistently meeting the highest quality of care and meeting our customers'…

Health
7
Newark Beth Israel Medical Center

The spirit that infuses newark beth israel medical center and children's hospital of new jersey is its commitment to excellence. our mission is to achieve this excellence through: - the delivery of primary health care to all who need our…

Health
8
Jersey City Medical Center

The organization's mission is to offer healthcare services with compassion and dignity. the organization provides patients, their families and all in need, excellence in hospital and healthcare services and programs to enhance community…

Health
9
Montefiore New Rochelle Hospital

Mission: to heal, to teach, to discover and to advance the health of the communities we serve. values: humanity, innovation, teamwork, diversity and equity - our values define our philosophy of care. they shape our actions and motivate and…

Health
10
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
11
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
12
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center; the most unlike its peers is Alliance for Downtown New York Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
16/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YALE UNIVERSITY: $2,000,000 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITY+10 more: $306,264 · Other+10 moreTHE WEBB SCHOOLS: $410,000 · EducationTHE WEBB SCHOOLSUniversity of Chicago: $300,000 · EducationUniversity of ChicagoThe George Washington University: $150,000 · EducationThe George Washington Univ…CENTRASTATE MEDICAL CENTER INC: $60,000 · HealthCLARA MAASS MEDICAL CENTER: $60,000 · HealthST LUKE'S METHODIST HOSPITAL: $30,000 · HealthMontefiore Health System Inc: $30,000 · HealthPHOEBE PUTNEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC: $20,000 · HealthBrockton Hospital Inc: $10,000 · HealthALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION: $10,000 · Health+4 more: $10,865 · HealthUNITED WAY OF ESSEX & WEST HUDSON D/B/A UNITED WAY OF GREATER NEWARK: $89,760 · PhilanthropyALLIANCE FOR DOWNTOWN NEW YORK INC: $89,760 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY HELP IN PARK SLOPE INC: $76,937 · Human ServicesFOUNDATION FOR THE GLOBAL COMPACT: $45,000 · International
Other$2,306,264Education$860,000Health$230,865Philanthropy$89,760Community Improvement$89,760Human Services$76,937International$45,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE WEBB SCHOOLS: $410,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $300,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF ESSEX & WEST HUDSON D/B/A UNITED WAY OF GREATER NEWARK: $89,760 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetALLIANCE FOR DOWNTOWN NEW YORK INC: $89,760 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY HELP IN PARK SLOPE INC: $76,937 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetCENTRASTATE MEDICAL CENTER INC: $60,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR THE GLOBAL COMPACT: $45,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST LUKE'S METHODIST HOSPITAL: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMontefiore Health System Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHOEBE PUTNEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBrockton Hospital Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST LUKE'S-ROOSEVELT HOSPITAL CENTER: $5,719 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $1,429 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUTTER HEALTH: $143 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC6.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fosun Foundation (New York) funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fosun Foundation (New York). Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Brockton Hospital Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • United Way of Essex & West Hudson D/B/a United Way of Greater Newark: 2% of income from government
  • Centrastate Medical Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fosun Foundation (New York)’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home