Skip to content

California · Public charity

Forte for Children

To improve the quality of life for disadvantaged children in southern california and the communities in which we do business.

$360k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
6
Grants FY2024
6
Organizations funded FY2023
0%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$60,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$60,000
Organizations funded a year
6 to 7
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$671k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 0% of the organizations Forte for Children funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving6$360k17%
FY20236$420k0%
FY20226$360k0%
FY20216$480k0%
FY20206$256k0%
FY20197$393k0%
FY20187$500k14%
FY20177$556kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Youth Development$2.1MArts & Culture$515kHuman Services$515kPhilanthropy$119kHousing & Shelter$46k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Where it is load-bearing

Forte for Children supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 9 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBoys and Girls Club of Vista Inc: $561,651 over 8y, 7.7% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Carlsbad: $538,801 over 8y, 2.9% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of San Marcos: $514,801 over 8y, 4.2% of budgetCasa De Amparo: $514,801 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetMoonlight Cultural Foundation: $514,801 over 8y, 9.4% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Oceanside Inc: $454,801 over 7y, 4.0% of budgetSound Start a Sound United Foundation: $119,086 over 2y, 36% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Northwest San Diego County Inc: $60,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSolutions for Change Inc: $45,712 over 1y, 0.9% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 9.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Issa Family FoundationCA20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Issa Family Foundation · Walter J & Betty C Zable Foundation · The Conrad Prebys Foundation · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · The Nordson Corporation Foundation · The San Diego Foundation · Boys and Girls Aid Society of San Diego Ltd · David C Copley Foundation · Boys & Girls Clubs of America · Sempra Foundation · Good360 · McCarthy Family Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Forte for Children with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Forte for Children?

Find your warmest path to Forte for Children through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Forte for Children

How much does Forte for Children give?
Forte for Children reported 6 grants totaling $360,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 6 and 7 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Forte for Children fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Youth Development (64%), Arts & Culture (15%), Human Services (15%).
Who are Forte for Children's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Boys and Girls Club of Vista Inc ($562k), Boys & Girls Clubs of Carlsbad ($539k), Boys & Girls Club of San Marcos ($515k).
Does Forte for Children fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Forte for Children?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Issa Family Foundation, Walter J & Betty C Zable Foundation, The Conrad Prebys Foundation.
Where is Forte for Children based?
Forte for Children is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Forte for Children’s filings →

More from the funding graph