Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Fort Wayne Beagle Club Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$172k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20232025.

Animals$431kPublic Safety & Disaster$24kRecreation & Sports$5k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$910k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARK ANIMAL RESCUE & ADOPTION INC$20,000
COMMUNITY HUMANE SHELTER OF STEUBEN COUNTY$20,000
WABASH COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER INC$20,000
DEKALB HUMANE SOCIETY$20,000
COMMUNITY HUMANE SHELTER OF NOBLE CO$20,000
HUMANE FORT WAYNE$20,000
HUNTINGTON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$20,000
ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE KOSCIUSKO CO$20,000
INDIANA SEARCH AND RESCUE RESPONSE TEAM$12,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY23–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 82% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ARK ANIMAL RESCUE & ADOPTION INC: $20k → 8%DEKALB HUMANE SOCIETY: $20k → 9%Indiana High School Rodeo Assoc Inc: $5k → 9%COMMUNITY HUMANE SHELTER OF STEUBEN COUNTY: $20k → 9%INDIANA SEARCH AND RESCUE RESPONSE TEAM: $12k → 10%Potawatomi Wildlife Park Inc: $10k → 10%Animal Welfare League Kosciusko Co: $20k → 11%Humane Fort Wayne: $25k → 12%Wabash County Animal Shelter Inc: $25k → 12%HUNTINGTON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $70k → 13%ARK ANIMAL RESCUE & ADOPTION INC: $15k → 8%DeKalb Humane Society: $10k → 9%COMMUNITY HUMANE SHELTER OF STEUBEN COUNTY: $10k → 9%COMMUNITY HUMANE SHELTER OF NOBLE CO: $33k → 10%ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE KOSCIUSKO CO: $20k → 11%HUMANE FORT WAYNE: $20k → 12%WABASH COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $20k → 12%HUNTINGTON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $20k → 13%ARK ANIMAL RESCUE & ADOPTION INC: $15k → 8%COMMUNITY HUMANE SHELTER OF STEUBEN COUNTY: $1k → 9%COMMUNITY HUMANE SHELTER OF NOBLE CO: $20k → 10%INDIANA SEARCH & RESPONSE TEAM K-9: $12k → 12%HUNTINGTON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $10k → 13%COMMUNITY HUMANE SHELTER OF NOBLE CO: $20k → 10%BLACK PINE ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $7k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$414k · 8 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
4

Total granted

$414k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+98%

Still filing today

75%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
AnimalsRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    HUNTINGTON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $100k · revenue +56%
  • AA
    ARK ANIMAL RESCUE & ADOPTION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $50k · revenue +27%
  • SC
    STEUBEN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $31k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • IS
    INDIANA SEARCH & RESPONSE TEAM K-9
    one grant, 2023 · $12k
  • PW
    Potawatomi Wildlife Park Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • PA
    PROFESSIONAL ANIMAL RETIREMENT CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $7k · revenue +98%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Marion County Humane Society

The marion county humane society was established for the purpose of providing temporary care and housing of stray or homeless dogs and cats, to assist in the return of lost dogs and cats to their owners, to provide a means of finding new…

Animals
2
Van Wert County Humane Society Inc

The van wert county humane society is committed to building a community of responsible pet owners and ending animal cruelty; to offering a safe haven for animals in need; and to attempt through all reasonable avenues to return animals to…

Animals
3
Wayne County Humane Society
Animals
4
Nw Arkansas Animal Rescue Inc

To rescue animals

Animals
5
Starke County Humane Society Inc

Animal shelter

Animals
6
Butler County Humane Society
Animals
7
Humane Society of Monroe County Il

The organization rescues animals and cares for them until they can find them qualified homes.

Animals
8
Humane Society of Richland Wilkin Co

To improve the qulity of life for companion animals, to place homeless cats & dogs in suitable homes, & to provide programs to reduce the overpopulation and euthanasia of companion animals.

Animals
9
Bartholomew County Humane Society Inc

Humane treatment of stray dogs and cats

Animals
10
Humane Society of Central Illinois

HSCIs mission is to find loving, forever homes for abused and unwanted pets.

Animals
11
Des Moines County Humane Society

The des moines county humane society provides shelter and rescue operations for animals in des moines county, secures permanent, loving homes for abandoned, abused, or neglected animals, and teaches responsible pet ownership and compassion…

Animals
12
Fur Animal Rescue

Animal rescue organization dedicated to finding homes for animals at the animal shelter. we also provde vet care foster homes, and assistance with homing for special needs animals.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dekalb Humane Society Inc and the most unlike its peers is Indiana High School Odeo Assn. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HUNTINGTON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $100,000 · AnimalsHUNTINGTON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INCARK ANIMAL RESCUE & ADOPTION — $50,000 · AnimalsARK ANIMAL RESCUE & ADOPTIONWABASH COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER INC — $45,000 · AnimalsWABASH COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER INCHUMANE FORT WAYNE INC — $45,000 · AnimalsHUMANE FORT WAYNE INCSTEUBEN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $31,000 · AnimalsSTEUBEN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INCDEKALB HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $30,000 · AnimalsDEKALB HUMANE SOCIETY INC+1 more — $7,000 · AnimalsCOMMUNITY HUMANE SHELTER OF NOBLE CO — $73,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY HUMANE SHELTER OF NOBLE COAnimal Welfare League Kosciusko Co — $40,000 · OtherAnimal Welfare League Kosciusko CoINDIANA SEARCH AND RESCUE RESPONSE TEAM — $12,000 · OtherINDIANA SEARCH AND RESCUE RESPONSE T…INDIANA SEARCH & RESPONSE TEAM K-9 — $12,000 · OtherINDIANA SEARCH & RESPONSE TEAM K-9Potawatomi Wildlife Park Inc — $10,000 · OtherPotawatomi Wildlife Park IncINDIANA HIGH SCHOOL ODEO ASSN — $5,000 · Recreation & Sports
Animals$308,000Other$147,000Recreation & Sports$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHUNTINGTON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $100,000 over 3y, 9.8% of budgetARK ANIMAL RESCUE & ADOPTION — $50,000 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetWABASH COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER INC — $45,000 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetHUMANE FORT WAYNE INC — $45,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSTEUBEN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $31,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetDEKALB HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $30,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetPROFESSIONAL ANIMAL RETIREMENT CENTER INC — $7,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetINDIANA HIGH SCHOOL ODEO ASSN — $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sabino Family Charitable FoundationDE13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sabino Family Charitable Foundation · Community Foundation of Greater Fort Wayne Inc · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Fort Wayne Beagle Club Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Fort Wayne Beagle Club Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Fort Wayne Beagle Club Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph