Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Forker-Smith Fdn E Forker Ttee

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$71k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Health$63kReligion$55kHuman Services$45kEducation$34kYouth Development$31kPublic Safety & Disaster$29kEmployment$19kAnimals$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$6,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST VINCENT DEPAUL$8,000
DRESS FOR SUCCESS$7,000
ROTHENBERG ROOFTOP SCHOOL GARDEN$7,000
FERNSIDE CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN$6,000
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION GREATER CINCINNAT$6,000
CHURCH OF THE ADVENT OPEN DOOR MINISTRY$6,000
WELCOME HOUSE OF CINCINNATI$6,000
JOSEPH HOUSE INC$6,000
PRAY HOPE BELIEVE FOUNDATION$5,000
HEAT$5,000
SMILES FOR SENIORS$5,000
CRAYONS TO COMPUTERS$4,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$206k · 14 repeat orgs$93k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
11

Total granted

$206k
$83k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+12%

Still filing today

29%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JH
    Joseph House Inc
    4× · 2021–2025 · $23k · revenue +51%
  • RR
    ROTHENBERG ROOFTOP GARDEN
    4× · 2021–2025 · $23k · revenue -54%
  • SV
    ST VINCENT DEPAUL
    3× · 2021–2024 · $21k

Funded once

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +23%
  • RP
    ROTHENBERG PREPARATORY ACADEMY
    one grant, 2023 · $7k
  • RM
    RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE
    one grant, 2022 · $7k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tragedy Assistance Program for Survivors Inc

The tragedy assistance program for survivors (taps) is america's national nonprofit organization that has cared for the loved ones of our nation's fallen heroes since 1994. taps ensures these living legacies of service and sacrifice do not…

Health
2
Cove Behavioral Health Inc

Cove behavioral health supports our community's overall wellness by providing accessible and compassionate behavioral health care. cove behavioral health is committed to excellence in behavioral health care and to building a shared vision…

Health
3
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
4
The Institute for Psychiatric Neuroscience

To carry out and support basic research related to Obsessive Compulsive Disorder OCD and Depression.

5
Father Flanagan's Boys' Home

Changing the way America cares for children and families.

Human Services
6
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
7
Revive Inc

Empowering individuals on their journey to lasting recovery. our team of dedicated professionals offer a dynamic blend of therapeutic support and personal empowerment. we dont just offer recovery; we provide a roadmap to your vibrant…

Health
8
Beech Acres

Beech acres parenting center, an ohio not-for-proft, has served children and families in greater cincinnati since 1849. we combine science and compassion to deliver innovative solutions that equip adults to meet children's needs and…

Human Services
9
Bethesda Foundation Inc

Support bethesda hospital to accomplish its strategic vision and meet health care challenges.

Health
10
Miami Bridge Youth and Family Services Inc

Provide crisis intervention for youths.

11
Breakthrough T1D

Breakthrough t1d is the leading global t1d organization working to accelerate life-changing breakthroughs to cure, prevent, and treat t1d and its complications.

Health
12
The Crisis Center of Tampa Bay Inc

The mission of the crisis center of tampa bay (the crisis center, or "agency") is to ensure that no one in our community has to face crisis alone.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crayons and Beyond Inc and the most unlike its peers is Rothenberg Rooftop Garden. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST VINCENT DEPAUL — $21,000 · OtherST VINCENT DEPAULDRESS FOR SUCCESS — $19,000 · OtherDRESS FOR SUCCESSCHURCH OF THE ADVENT — $17,000 · OtherCHURCH OF THE ADVENTST VINCENT DEPAUL — $16,000 · OtherST VINCENT DEPAULFERNSIDE CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN — $12,000 · OtherFERNSIDE CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDRENCHURCH OF THE ADVENT OPEN DOOR MINISTRY — $12,000 · OtherCHURCH OF THE ADVENT OPEN DOOR MINISTRYDRESS FOR SUCCESS — $11,000 · OtherDRESS FOR SUCCESSSMILES FOR SENIORS — $10,000 · OtherHEAT — $10,000 · OtherALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION GREATER CINCINNAT — $9,000 · OtherROTHENBERG PREPARATORY ACADEMY — $7,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE — $7,000 · OtherLIGHTHOUSE YOUTH FAMILY SERVICES — $7,000 · Other+6 more — $31,000 · Other+6 moreROTHENBERG ROOFTOP GARDEN — $23,000 · EducationROTHENBERG RO…BEEX FOUNDATION — $13,000 · EducationBEEX FOUNDATI…Joseph House Inc — $23,000 · HealthJoseph Hou…FERNSIDE INC A CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN — $5,000 · HealthFERNSIDE I…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $25,000 · Human ServicesAmerican …PRAY HOPE BELIEVE FOUNDATION — $10,000 · PhilanthropyCRAYONS AND BEYOND INC — $4,000 · PhilanthropyK9S FOR WARRIORS INC — $7,000 · Animals
Other$189,000Education$36,000Health$28,000Human Services$25,000Philanthropy$14,000Animals$7,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJoseph House Inc — $23,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetROTHENBERG ROOFTOP GARDEN — $23,000 over 4y, 7.4% of budgetPRAY HOPE BELIEVE FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC — $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFERNSIDE INC A CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCRAYONS AND BEYOND INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds Joseph House Inc
  • Who funds ROTHENBERG ROOFTOP GARDEN
  • Who funds BEEX FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PRAY HOPE BELIEVE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds K9S FOR WARRIORS INC
  • Who funds FERNSIDE INC A CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN
  • Who funds CRAYONS AND BEYOND INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Cincinnati FoundationOH13× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Forker-Smith Fdn E Forker Ttee funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • K9S for Warriors Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Forker-Smith Fdn E Forker Ttee?

Find your warmest path to Forker-Smith Fdn E Forker Ttee through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph