Skip to content
Forever Fallucca Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Forever Fallucca Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$45k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$117kYouth Development$38kFood & Nutrition$37kHealth$17kCommunity Improvement$15kArts & Culture$5kHuman Services$4kReligion$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$597k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRAFTON SCHOOL DISTRICT$25,000
ST PAUL LUTHERAN SCHOOL$10,000
HUNGER TASK FORCE$9,328
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 52% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%THE LEUKEMIA AND LYMPHOMA SOCIETY INC: $5k → 9%BEAT CHILDHOOD CANCER: $250 → 5%GRAFTON SCHOOL DISTRICT: $25k → 6%WOMEN'S FUND OF DOOR CO: $4k → 8%EASTBROOK ACADEMY INC: $3k → 17%OPERATION DREAM: $10k → 9%COUSIN SUBS INC -MAKE IT BETTER FOUNDATION: $500 → 5%GRAFTON SCHOOL DISTRICT: $25k → 6%DOOR COUNTY AUDITORIUM: $1k → 8%Eastbrook Church Inc: $3k → 17%GRAFTON SCHOOL DISTRICT: $25k → 6%EASTBROOK ACADEMY INC: $2k → 17%ST PAUL LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $10k → 6%HISPANIC PROFESSIONALS OF GREATER MILWAUKEE: $10k → 17%GRAFTON GLADIATORS: $1k → 6%MILWAUKEE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION: $5k → 17%GRAFTON GLADIATORS: $750 → 6%HISPANIC PROFESSIONALS OF GREATER MILWAUKEE: $5k → 17%GRAFTON GRIDIRON CLUB: $300 → 6%HUNGER TASK FORCE: $10k → 17%CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC: $8k → 6%HUNGER TASK FORCE: $9k → 17%CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC: $5k → 6%HUNGER TASK FORCE: $8k → 17%CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC: $5k → 6%DOMINICAN HIGH SCHOOL: $10k → 17%ALLIANCE BIBLE CHURCH: $481 → 6%GIRLS ON THE RUN OF SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN INC: $3k → 17%GIRLS ON THE RUN OF SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN INC: $3k → 17%Exploit No More Inc: $3k → 17%AURORA HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION: $7k → 17%URBAN ECOLOGY CENTER INC: $1k → 17%MIDWEST ATHLETES AGAINST CHILDHOOD CANCER INC: $5k → 17%KINSHIP MKE INC FKA RIVERWEST FOOD PANTRY: $10k → 17%OPERATION DREAM INC: $10k → 17%OPERATION DREAM INC: $10k → 17%OPERATION DREAM INC: $10k → 17%PEARLS FOR TEEN GIRLS INC: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 100% of Forever Fallucca Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 94% of the giving stays in WI; by stated purpose, 0%.

Forever Fallucca Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$175k · 8 repeat orgs$77k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
16

Total granted

$175k
$66k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+30%

Still filing today

88%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthPhilanthropyFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CU
    CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $18k · revenue +9%
  • HISPANIC PROFESSIONALS OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $15k · revenue +49%
  • GIRLS ON THE RUN OF SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $5k · revenue +143%

Funded once

  • OD
    OPERATION DREAM
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • KINSHIP MKE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +46%
  • DH
    DOMINICAN HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc

Inspiring philanthropy, serving donors, strengthening communities, now and for future generations.

Philanthropy
2
NourishMKE Inc

We're a network of community food centers that specializes in food, love, and community. Hunger is a real problem, and access to food should be a fundamental right. No one should be made to feel they're not deserving of nourishment when…

Food & Nutrition
3
Oconomowoc Area Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
4
Radio Milwaukee Inc

To reach a new generation of radio listeners on air, online and in the community with a compelling selection of music and public affairs programming. the corporation celebrates milwaukee music, arts, heritage, and culture by supporting and…

Arts & Culture
5
A Better Chicago

A better chicago is changing how chicago fights poverty by investing in bold ideas that create opportunity for our youth.

Human Services
6
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
7
Uwm At Waukesha Foundation Inc

To raise scholarship money for students and raise the awareness of the campus and all of the activities on campus

—
8
My Choice Wisconsin Inc

We inspire people to experience life at its fullest by encouraging ownership of health, fostering independence, and serving the whole person; and do so with an unwavering commitment as stewards of medicaid funding.

Health
9
Uwm Research Foundation Inc

Support research and innovation at the university of wisconsin - milwaukee by providing reserach funding, entrepreneurship support, and by engaging in corporate partnering activities to that end.

Community Improvement
10
Milwaukee Excellence Inc

The mission of the organization is to provide a high quality education for all students with choices after graduation that will provide financial stability, inspire personal freedom to builda legacy.

—
11
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
12
The University School of Milwaukee Corporation

University school of milwaukee cultivates excellence in learning, leadership, and citizenship for prekindergarten through 12th grade students. students are engaged, known, and valued within our passionate independent school community…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Midwest Athletes Against Childhood Cancer Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cousins Subs Make It Better Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GRAFTON SCHOOL DISTRICT: $75,000 · OtherGRAFTON SCHOOL DISTRICTOPERATION DREAM INC: $30,000 · OtherOPERATION DREAM INCHUNGER TASK FORCE INC: $27,071 · OtherHUNGER TASK FORCE INCOPERATION DREAM: $10,000 · OtherOPERATION DREAMST PAUL LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $10,000 · OtherST PAUL LUTHERAN SCHOOLDOMINICAN HIGH SCHOOL: $10,000 · OtherDOMINICAN HIGH SCHOOL+10 more: $18,981 · Other+10 moreCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC: $17,500 · EducationCONCORDIA U…EASTBROOK ACADEMY INC: $4,000 · EducationEASTBROOK A…Pearls for Teen Girls Inc: $3,000 · EducationPearls for …HISPANIC PROFESSIONALS OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC: $15,000 · Community ImprovementKINSHIP MKE INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $5,000 · HealthMIDWEST ATHLETES AGAINST CHILDHOOD CANCER INC: $4,843 · HealthAURORA HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC: $6,500 · PhilanthropyCOUSINS SUBS MAKE IT BETTER FOUNDATION INC: $500 · PhilanthropyGIRLS ON THE RUN OF SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN INC: $5,000 · Youth Development
Other$181,052Education$24,500Community Improvement$15,000Food & Nutrition$10,000Health$9,843Philanthropy$7,000Youth Development$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOPERATION DREAM INC: $30,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetHUNGER TASK FORCE INC: $27,071 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC: $17,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHISPANIC PROFESSIONALS OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC: $15,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetKINSHIP MKE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAURORA HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC: $6,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN OF SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIDWEST ATHLETES AGAINST CHILDHOOD CANCER INC: $4,843 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEASTBROOK ACADEMY INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetExploit No More Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetGRAFTON GLADIATORS INC: $1,750 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetURBAN ECOLOGY CENTER INC: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOUSINS SUBS MAKE IT BETTER FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Herbert H Kohl Charit…Greater Milwaukee Fou…Baird Foundation IncGreater Green Bay Com…United Way of Greater…Direct Supply Foundat…Waukesha County Commu…The Lynde and Harry B…Green Bay Packers Fou…Ge Aerospace Foundati…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…American Endowment Fo…
Herbert H Kohl Charities IncWI21.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Direct Supply Foundation Inc · Waukesha County Community Foundation · The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Forever Fallucca Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Forever Fallucca Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Forever Fallucca’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home