Skip to content

· Private foundation

Forest Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$110k
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$207kHealth$121kHuman Services$119kArts & Culture$68kReligion$51kCivil Rights$40kRecreation & Sports$20kPublic Safety & Disaster$11kOther$0
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k23 grants · $81k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$3,300
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE JEWISH FEDERATION$15,300
CITY OF HOPE$14,200
JEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION$9,500
US HOLOCAUST MUSEUM$7,100
CONCERN FOUNDATION$5,800
JEWISH FNDT FOR THE RIGHTEOUS$5,700
MAKE-A-WISH TRI-COUNTIES$4,700
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES$4,700
ISRAEL TENNIS EDUCATION CENTERS$3,800
VENICE FAMILY CLINIC$3,800
VISTA DEL MAR$3,800
WORLD JEWISH CONGRESS$3,800
SKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER$3,300
HILLEL AT STANFORD$2,400
SAINT JOHN'S HEALTHCARE CENTER FOUN$2,300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%VISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY: $4k → 14%VISTA DEL MAR: $4k → 14%VISTA DEL MAR: $4k → 14%VISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY: $3k → 14%VISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY: $3k → 14%VISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $500 → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $200 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NY
IA
NJ
CA
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$653k · 33 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

33 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
5

Total granted

$653k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+48%

Still filing today

45%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesInternationalPhilanthropyCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JF
    JEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $60k · revenue +30%
  • CF
    CONCERN FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $39k · revenue +30%
  • TU
    The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
    8× · 2017–2024 · $38k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • LB
    LEO BAECK TEMPLE
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
  • UJ
    UCLA JONSSON COMPREHENSIVE CANCER C
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • SMILE TRAIN INC
    one grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue +19%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
2
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
3
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
4
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
5
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
6
Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles

We steward $1.5 billion in charitable assets through donor-advised funds, endowments, and other giving vehicles. partnering with 1,400 individuals, families, and organizations, we build enduring legacies and multigenerational impact. in…

Philanthropy
7
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
8
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
9
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
10
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
11
National Jewish Health

National Jewish Health's mission since 1899 is to heal, discover and educate as a preeminent healthcare institution. We serve by providing the best integrated and innovative care for patients and their families; by understanding and…

Health
12
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saint John's Health Center Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Optimist Boys' Home and Ranch Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
16/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE JEWISH FEDERATION: $107,200 · OtherTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONCITY OF HOPE: $100,000 · OtherCITY OF HOPEJEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $59,600 · OtherJEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATIONJEWISH FNDT FOR THE RIGHTEOUS: $29,000 · OtherJEWISH FNDT FOR THE RIGHTEOUSWORLD JEWISH CONGRESS: $26,200 · OtherWORLD JEWISH CONGRESSHILLEL AT STANFORD: $17,500 · Other+17 more: $123,225 · Other+17 moreThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $38,400 · Arts & CultureThe United …SKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER: $20,608 · Arts & CultureSKIRBALL CU…SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $9,400 · Arts & CultureSIMON WIESE…+1 more: $1,500 · Arts & CultureVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $22,200 · HealthChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $14,400 · HealthPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · HealthSAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION: $2,400 · HealthOptimist Boys' Home and Ranch Inc: $2,000 · Health+1 more: $300 · HealthCONCERN FOUNDATION: $38,700 · PhilanthropyVISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $18,500 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $11,200 · Human ServicesNEW JEWISH NARRATIVE INC: $6,600 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $500 · InternationalANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $2,900 · Civil Rights
Other$462,725Arts & Culture$69,908Health$51,300Philanthropy$38,700Human Services$29,700International$7,100Civil Rights$2,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $59,600 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetCONCERN FOUNDATION: $38,700 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $38,400 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $22,200 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER: $20,608 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetVISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $18,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $14,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION: $11,200 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $11,200 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $9,400 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNEW JEWISH NARRATIVE INC: $6,600 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $2,900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION: $2,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOptimist Boys' Home and Ranch Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR THE RIGHTEOUS INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT JOHN'S CANCER INSTITUTE: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds CONCERN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds VENICE FAMILY CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds SKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds VISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds THE JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW JEWISH NARRATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds SAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Optimist Boys' Home and Ranch Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR THE RIGHTEOUS INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds SAINT JOHN'S CANCER INSTITUTE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Forest Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Forest Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Forest Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Forest Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Forest Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph