Skip to content

· Private foundation

Forage & Grassland Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$131kEducation$72kReligion$4kFood & Nutrition$3k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$1,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$611k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERNATIONAL GRASSLAND CONGRESS$12,702
AMERICAN FORAGE & GRASSLAND COUNCIL$5,500
THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY$1,000
WILSON COLLEGE$1,000
NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE KNOXVILLE$1,000
TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON$1,000
PURDUE UNIVERSITY$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE$750
UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY$750
KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY$750
UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS MONTICELLO$750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 88% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO: $1k → 16%WILSON COLLEGE: $1k → 9%OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 19%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%AUBURN UNIVERSITY: $10k → 15%KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 20%COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS: $1k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON: $2k → 10%NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 8%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 19%THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 15%MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 24%NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 12%VIRGINIA FORAGE & GRASSLAND COUNCIL: $12k → 8%EASTERN MENNONITE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 11%VIRGINIA TECH: $2k → 21%UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT: $1k → 10%INTERNATIONAL GRASSLAND CONGRESS: $13k → 16%AUBURN UNIVERSITY: $1k → 15%KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $750 → 20%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON: $1k → 10%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 19%MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 24%NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $880 → 12%VIRGINIA TECH: $1k → 21%AMERICAN FORAGE & GRASSLAND COUNCIL: $12k → 16%AUBURN UNIVERSITY: $1k → 15%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 19%VIRGINIA TECH: $1k → 21%INTERNATIONAL GRASSLAND CONGRESS: $10k → 16%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 19%VIRGINIA TECH: $1k → 21%INTERNATIONAL GRASSLAND CONGRESS: $9k → 16%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 19%INTERNATIONAL GRASSLAND CONGRESS: $9k → 16%INTERNATIONAL GRASSLAND CONGRESS: $7k → 16%AMERICAN FORAGE & GRASSLAND COUNCIL: $7k → 16%AMERICAN FORAGE & GRASSLAND COUNCIL: $7k → 16%INTERNATIONAL GRASSLAND CONGRESS: $6k → 16%AMERICAN FORAGE & GRASSLAND COUNCIL: $6k → 16%AMERICAN FORAGE & GRASSLAND COUNCIL: $6k → 16%INTERNATIONAL GRASSLAND CONGRESS: $6k → 16%AMERICAN FORAGE & GRASSLAND COUNCIL: $5k → 16%AMERICAN FORAGE & GRASSLAND COUNCIL: $5k → 16%INTERNATIONAL GRASSLAND CONGRESS: $4k → 16%AMERICAN FORAGE & GRASSLAND COUNCIL: $3k → 16%AMERICAN FORAGE & GRASSLAND COUNCIL: $2k → 16%INTERNATIONAL GRASSLAND CONGRESS: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
ID
ND
WI
MI
WY
IA
IN
OH
PA
MO
KY
VA
KS
AR
TN
NC
OK
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 39% of Forage & Grassland Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 62% of the giving stays in KY; by stated purpose, 53%.

Forage & Grassland Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$176k · 17 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +376% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
15

Total granted

$176k
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+376%
+30%

Still filing today

12%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    INTERNATIONAL GRASSLAND CONGRESS
    7× · 2019–2025 · $65k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FORAGE AND GRASSLAND COUNCIL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $52k · revenue -44%
  • AU
    AUBURN UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2022–2024 · $12k

Funded once

  • VF
    VIRGINIA FORAGE & GRASSLAND COUNCIL
    one grant, 2017 · $12k
  • KF
    KENTUCKY FORAGE & GRASSLAND COUNCIL
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TEENNESSEE
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Furman University

Furman university is an institution of higher education providing distinctive undergraduate education emphasizing an engaged approach combining classroom learning with real world experiences and self-discovery.

Education
2
The Governors of the University of Calgary

The University is a board-governed public post-secondary institution operating in Alberta as a Comprehensive Academic and Research University (CARU) under the authority of the Post-secondary Learning Act (PSLA). CARU institutions have an…

—
3
The Associates of the University

The Organization's mission is to accept donations from sources within the United States for the benefit of the University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

—
4
Augsburg University

A private lutheran four-year university located in downtown minneapolis.

Education
5
DePauw University

DePauw is a nationally-recognized, leading liberal arts college committed to creating an atmosphere of intellectual challenge & engagement that prepares students for lifelong success.

Education
6
Augustana University Association

A four-year liberal arts university affiliated with the evangelical lutheran church.

Education
7
University of the Ozarks

A presbyterian church related university that provides undergraduate liberal arts education.

Education
8
Augustana College

Offer a challenging education that develops the qualities of mind, spirit and body for students.

Education
9
American Association of State Colleges and Universities

Aascu elevates and transforms member institutions through effective public policy and leadership enabling its members to drive regional economic mobility through student access and success while helping to solve their communities' most…

Education
10
National Association of College and

Advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.

—
11
Iowa State University Foundation

Aligning donor passion and generosity to advance iowa state university's land grant ideals.

Education
12
University of New Haven

University of new haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts & professional education.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wilson College; the most unlike its peers is International Grassland Congress. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN FORAGE AND GRASSLAND COUNCIL: $51,600 · OtherAMERICAN FORAGE AND GRASSLAND COUNCILAUBURN UNIVERSITY: $12,000 · OtherAUBURN UNIVERSITYVIRGINIA FORAGE & GRASSLAND COUNCIL: $12,000 · OtherVIRGINIA FORAGE & GRASSLAND COUNCILUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA: $7,850 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDAUNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE: $5,250 · OtherTRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · OtherVIRGINIA TECH: $4,800 · Other+24 more: $43,850 · Other+24 moreINTERNATIONAL GRASSLAND CONGRESS: $65,172 · Civil RightsINTERNATIONAL GRASSLAND CONGRESSWILSON COLLEGE: $1,000 · EducationCOLLEGE OF THE OZARKS: $1,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $440 · Education
Other$142,350Civil Rights$65,172Education$2,440

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTERNATIONAL GRASSLAND CONGRESS: $65,172 over 7y, 6.3% of budgetAMERICAN FORAGE AND GRASSLAND COUNCIL: $51,600 over 9y, 6.7% of budgetWILSON COLLEGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEastern Mennonite University: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE OF THE OZARKS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $440 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL GRASSLAND CONGRESS ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FORAGE AND GRASSLAND COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds KENTUCKY FORAGE & GRASSLAND COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds WILSON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Eastern Mennonite University ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Forage & Grassland Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Forage & Grassland Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Forage & Grassland’s filings →

    More from the funding graph