Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Forage & Grassland Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Environment$131kEducation$72kReligion$4kFood & Nutrition$3k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$1,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$611k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERNATIONAL GRASSLAND CONGRESS$12,702
AMERICAN FORAGE & GRASSLAND COUNCIL$5,500
PURDUE UNIVERSITY$1,000
NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY$1,000
WILSON COLLEGE$1,000
THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE KNOXVILLE$1,000
TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE$750
KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY$750
UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY$750
UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS MONTICELLO$750
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 88% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO: $1k → 16%WILSON COLLEGE: $1k → 9%OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 19%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%AUBURN UNIVERSITY: $10k → 15%KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 20%COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS: $1k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON: $2k → 10%NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 8%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 19%THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 15%MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 24%NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 12%VIRGINIA FORAGE & GRASSLAND COUNCIL: $12k → 8%EASTERN MENNONITE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 11%VIRGINIA TECH: $2k → 21%UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT: $1k → 10%INTERNATIONAL GRASSLAND CONGRESS: $13k → 16%AUBURN UNIVERSITY: $1k → 15%KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $750 → 20%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON: $1k → 10%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 19%MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 24%NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $880 → 12%VIRGINIA TECH: $1k → 21%AMERICAN FORAGE & GRASSLAND COUNCIL: $12k → 16%AUBURN UNIVERSITY: $1k → 15%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 19%VIRGINIA TECH: $1k → 21%INTERNATIONAL GRASSLAND CONGRESS: $10k → 16%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 19%VIRGINIA TECH: $1k → 21%INTERNATIONAL GRASSLAND CONGRESS: $9k → 16%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 19%INTERNATIONAL GRASSLAND CONGRESS: $9k → 16%INTERNATIONAL GRASSLAND CONGRESS: $7k → 16%AMERICAN FORAGE & GRASSLAND COUNCIL: $7k → 16%AMERICAN FORAGE & GRASSLAND COUNCIL: $7k → 16%INTERNATIONAL GRASSLAND CONGRESS: $6k → 16%AMERICAN FORAGE & GRASSLAND COUNCIL: $6k → 16%AMERICAN FORAGE & GRASSLAND COUNCIL: $6k → 16%INTERNATIONAL GRASSLAND CONGRESS: $6k → 16%AMERICAN FORAGE & GRASSLAND COUNCIL: $5k → 16%AMERICAN FORAGE & GRASSLAND COUNCIL: $5k → 16%INTERNATIONAL GRASSLAND CONGRESS: $4k → 16%AMERICAN FORAGE & GRASSLAND COUNCIL: $3k → 16%AMERICAN FORAGE & GRASSLAND COUNCIL: $2k → 16%INTERNATIONAL GRASSLAND CONGRESS: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
ID
ND
WI
MI
WY
IA
IN
OH
PA
MO
KY
VA
KS
AR
TN
NC
OK
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 39% of Forage & Grassland Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 62% of the giving stays in KY; read by stated purpose it is 53% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Forage & Grassland Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$176k · 17 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +376% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
15

Total granted

$176k
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+376%
+30%

Still filing today

12%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    INTERNATIONAL GRASSLAND CONGRESS
    7× · 2019–2025 · $65k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FORAGE AND GRASSLAND COUNCIL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $52k · revenue -44%
  • AU
    AUBURN UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2022–2024 · $12k

Funded once

  • VF
    VIRGINIA FORAGE & GRASSLAND COUNCIL
    one grant, 2017 · $12k
  • KF
    KENTUCKY FORAGE & GRASSLAND COUNCIL
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TEENNESSEE
    one grant, 2020 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Furman University

Furman university is an institution of higher education providing distinctive undergraduate education emphasizing an engaged approach combining classroom learning with real world experiences and self-discovery.

Education
2
The Governors of the University of Calgary

The University is a board-governed public post-secondary institution operating in Alberta as a Comprehensive Academic and Research University (CARU) under the authority of the Post-secondary Learning Act (PSLA). CARU institutions have an…

3
The Associates of the University

The Organization's mission is to accept donations from sources within the United States for the benefit of the University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

4
Augsburg University

A private lutheran four-year university located in downtown minneapolis.

Education
5
DePauw University

DePauw is a nationally-recognized, leading liberal arts college committed to creating an atmosphere of intellectual challenge & engagement that prepares students for lifelong success.

Education
6
Augustana University Association

A four-year liberal arts university affiliated with the evangelical lutheran church.

Education
7
University of the Ozarks

A presbyterian church related university that provides undergraduate liberal arts education.

Education
8
Augustana College

Offer a challenging education that develops the qualities of mind, spirit and body for students.

Education
9
American Association of State Colleges and Universities

Aascu elevates and transforms member institutions through effective public policy and leadership enabling its members to drive regional economic mobility through student access and success while helping to solve their communities' most…

Education
10
National Association of College and

Advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.

11
Iowa State University Foundation

Aligning donor passion and generosity to advance iowa state university's land grant ideals.

Education
12
University of New Haven

University of new haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts & professional education.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wilson College and the most unlike its peers is International Grassland Congress. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AMERICAN FORAGE AND GRASSLAND COUNCIL — $51,600 · OtherAMERICAN FORAGE AND GRASSLAND COUNCILVIRGINIA FORAGE & GRASSLAND COUNCIL — $12,000 · OtherVIRGINIA FORAGE & GRASSLAND COUNCILAUBURN UNIVERSITY — $12,000 · OtherAUBURN UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA — $7,850 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDAUNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE — $5,250 · OtherTRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY — $5,000 · OtherVIRGINIA TECH — $4,800 · Other+24 more — $43,850 · Other+24 moreINTERNATIONAL GRASSLAND CONGRESS — $65,172 · Civil RightsINTERNATIONAL GRASSLAND CONGRESSCOLLEGE OF THE OZARKS — $1,000 · EducationWILSON COLLEGE — $1,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $440 · Education
Other$142,350Civil Rights$65,172Education$2,440

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetINTERNATIONAL GRASSLAND CONGRESS — $65,172 over 7y, 6.3% of budgetAMERICAN FORAGE AND GRASSLAND COUNCIL — $51,600 over 9y, 6.7% of budgetEastern Mennonite University — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE OF THE OZARKS — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILSON COLLEGE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $440 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL GRASSLAND CONGRESS
  • Who funds AMERICAN FORAGE AND GRASSLAND COUNCIL
  • Who funds KENTUCKY FORAGE & GRASSLAND COUNCIL
  • Who funds Eastern Mennonite University
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS
  • Who funds WILSON COLLEGE
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Forage & Grassland Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph