Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

For All the Children Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$155k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$57k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$3.7MHousing & Shelter$982kEducation$812kFood & Nutrition$350kHuman Services$263kYouth Development$248kPhilanthropy$160kRecreation & Sports$63kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $91k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $57k
$11,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES$57,000
JJ'S LEGACY$25,000
MORNING STAR FRESH FOOD MINISTRY$20,000
THE KERN COUNTY MUSEUM$14,724
LINKS FOR LIFE$11,000
KERN COUNTY CANCER FOUNDATION$10,000
BAKERSFIELD CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
FOUNDATION OF CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES$5,000
STOCKDALE HIGH SCHOOL$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $850k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GATHERING FOR WOMEN: $325k → 12%COVENANT COMMUNITY SERVICES: $78k → 18%WINDMARK SAILING FOUNDATION: $20k → 6%GATHERING FOR WOMEN: $150k → 12%GATHERING FOR WOMEN: $150k → 12%COVENANT COMMUNITY SERVICES: $25k → 18%COVENANT COMMUNITY SERVICES: $25k → 18%COVENANT COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10k → 18%GATHERING FOR WOMEN: $50k → 12%ANIMAL FRIENDS RESCUE PROJECT: $10k → 12%OCEANSIDE HOMELESS RESOURCE: $7k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 5% of For All the Children Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 97% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

For All the Children Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.5% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.9M · 16 repeat orgs$603k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +63% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
21

Total granted

$5.9M
$596k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+3%

Still filing today

63%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterEmploymentFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES
    6× · 2020–2025 · $3.4M · revenue +128%
  • MS
    Morning Star Fresh Food Ministry Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $320k · revenue +30% · 29% of their budget
  • CC
    COVENANT COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $138k · revenue +163%

Funded once

  • CS
    CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY BAKERSFIELD FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $250k · revenue -57%
  • CT
    CHRIST THE KING PARISH
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • FW
    Franciscan Workers of Junipero Serragraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +54%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Foundation of California State University Monterey Bay

To further the scientific, literary, educational and charitable purposes of california state university, monterey bay, including fundraising, development, endowment management, financial assistance, public relations and other support.

Education
2
California State University Foundation

Established in 1962, the foundation is the central foundation for the california state university (csu) system and serves the office of the chancellor. the foundation exists to support excellence in teaching and learning, and to serve the…

Philanthropy
3
Central California Food Bank

Ccfb is dedicated to ending hunger, working with over 200 partner agencies to provide food to those experiencing hunger. our mission: transforming lives together, in the passionate pursuit to end hunger in central ca - one meal, one…

Food & Nutrition
4
Cancer Support Community - California Central Coast

To help people affected by cancer enhance their health and well-being through participation in a professional program of emotional support, education, and hope at no cost.

Health
5
United Way of Central Eastern California Dba United Way of Kern County

The mission of the united way of kern county is to "mobilize donors, advocates and volunteers to improve lives in kern county." the organization accomplishes this by raising and investing financial resources in programs that advance the…

Philanthropy
6
Berkeley Community Scholars Dba Berkeley Community Fund

Berkeley Community Scholars empowers Berkeley youth who face racial, economic, and other barriers to achieving their college dreams by providing a unique experience of scholarships, advising, mentoring, and a community of support.

Philanthropy
7
California Bountiful Foundation

To advance public awareness, education, and understanding of california agriculture.

Environment
8
California Coastkeeper dba California Coastkeeper Alliance

California Coastkeeper Alliance unites Waterkeeper programs statewide to fight for swimmable, fishable, and drinkable waters for all Californians.

Environment
9
California Healthcare Foundation

Chcf is dedicated to advancing meaningful, measurable improvements in the way the health care delivery system provides care to the people of california, particularly those with low incomes and those whose needs are not well served by the…

10
Baker Family Foundation of California

To serve individuals and families by providing them with the charitable and educational resources needed to overcome hardship and improve their lives, health and career.

Philanthropy
11
Califonia State University East Bay Foundation Inc

Csu east bay foundation is an auxiliary organization of california state university east bay and the california state university system. the organization's mission is to provide services that aid, supplement, and advance the educational…

Education
12
Kern Medical Center Foundation

Kern medical center foundation is dedicated to promote education and programs that support the mission of kern medical center

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foundation for California Community Colleges and the most unlike its peers is Oceanside Homeless Resource. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Sports OrganizationsAnimal Rescue and WelfareKern County Community Organ…Arts & Cultural VenuesVulnerable Population Suppo…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr13%19%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr18%38%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr13%4%5–10yr19%25%10–20yr18%23%20–35yr13%17%35–55yr16%30%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/27
the rest of the field
12%
1,236/10,467

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
18/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES — $3,392,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES+7 more — $275,500 · Health+7 moreGATHERING FOR WOMEN - MONTEREY — $675,000 · Human ServicesGATHERING FOR W…COVENANT COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $137,500 · Human ServicesCOVENANT COMMUN…Franciscan Workers of Junipero Serra — $50,000 · Human ServicesFranciscan Work…+3 more — $37,000 · Human ServicesUC REGENTS — $255,000 · OtherUC REGENTSBAKERSFIELD HOMELESS SHELTER — $175,000 · OtherBAKERSFIELD HOME…HAIL MARY CLUB — $120,000 · OtherHAIL MARY CLUBBETHANY SERVICES INC — $100,000 · OtherBETHANY SERVICES…CHRIST THE KING PARISH — $50,000 · OtherNEW ADVANCES FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES — $50,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP YOUTH — $35,000 · OtherCASA ESPERANZA TRANSITIONAL HOME FOR WOMEN — $75,000 · OtherCASA ESPERANZA T…+10 more — $120,719 · Other+10 moreCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY BAKERSFIELD FOUNDATION — $250,000 · EducationBAKERSFIELD CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL — $135,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY CORPORATION AT MONTEREY BAY — $50,000 · Education+2 more — $7,000 · EducationMorning Star Fresh Food Ministry Inc — $320,000 · Food & NutritionUNITED BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY — $210,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MONTEREY COUNTY — $160,000 · Philanthropy
Health$3,667,500Human Services$899,500Other$980,719Education$442,000Food & Nutrition$320,000Youth Development$210,000Philanthropy$160,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES — $3,392,000 over 6y, 15% of budgetGATHERING FOR WOMEN - MONTEREY — $675,000 over 4y, 18% of budgetMorning Star Fresh Food Ministry Inc — $320,000 over 8y, 29% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY BAKERSFIELD FOUNDATION — $250,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetUNITED BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY — $210,000 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MONTEREY COUNTY — $160,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOVENANT COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $137,500 over 4y, 5.7% of budgetBAKERSFIELD CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL — $135,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetJJs Legacy — $120,000 over 7y, 9.7% of budgetLINKS FOR LIFE — $114,000 over 8y, 7.6% of budgetBETHANY SERVICES INC — $100,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCASA ESPERANZA TRANSITIONAL HOME FOR WOMEN — $75,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetFranciscan Workers of Junipero Serra — $50,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetNEW ADVANCES FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES — $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY CORPORATION AT MONTEREY BAY — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKERN COUNTY CANCER FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetPIE RANCH — $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetWINDMARK SAILING FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetAnimal Friends Rescue Project — $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetOCEANSIDE HOMELESS RESOURCE — $7,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetStockdale High Mustang Posse Association — $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetVV Family Foundation — $2,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCBCC FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY WELLNESS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kern Community FoundationCA25.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kern Community Foundation · San Joaquin Community Hospital dba Adventist Health Bakersfield · Bakersfield Memorial Hospital · Dignity Health · Diane S Lake Charitable Trust Lake Diane S Ttee · Greater Horizons · The Harvey L Hall Charitable Family Foundation Inc · Wurster Family Foundation · Robert Grimm Family Foundation · The Cynthia Lake Charitable Trust · The Virginia and Alfred Harrell Foundation · Monterey Peninsula Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization For All the Children Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph