Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Foodservice Packaging Institute Inc

To expand acceptance and promote the benefits of foodservice packaging; protect manufacturing of foodservice packaging from unwarranted intrusion by government.

$100k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Environment$980kCommunity Improvement$50kPublic Benefit$49kHousing & Shelter$28k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $50,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $99,500 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $49,500 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Conigliaro Industries Inc$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 47% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%Conigliaro Industries Inc: $50k → 8%CITY OF COON RAPIDS: $50k → 7%FAYETTE COUNTY PA: $49k → 17%KEEP CALIFORNIA BEAUTIFUL: $13k → 18%MADISON COUNTY NY: $43k → 11%OSTEGO COUNTY SOLID WASTE DEPARTMENT: $50k → 13%CITY OF AUSTIN - AUSTIN RESOURCE RECOVERY: $45k → 10%THE FOAM RECYCLER: $39k → 10%UNIVERSITY LUTHERAN CHURCH AND STUDENT CENTER: $23k → 13%COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPT: $50k → 10%ST LUCIE COUNTY BALING AND RECYCLING FACILITY: $50k → 13%OUTGAMIE COUNTY: $50k → 7%AGILYX CORPORATION: $50k → 8%KEEP AMERICA BEAUTIFUL: $25k → 9%BINGHAMPTON DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $50k → 17%MECLENBERG COUNTY GOVERNMENT: $50k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA WILMINGTON: $10k → 12%HENDERSONVILLE NC: $40k → 12%ATLANTA CHARM: $41k → 13%GEAUGA-TRUMBULL: $50k → 16%VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT: $49k → 14%THE RECYCLING PARTNERSHIP: $25k → 4%SOUTH SUBURBAN COLLEGE: $50k → 14%THE RECYCLING PARTNERSHIP: $25k → 4%THE RECYCLING PARTNERSHIP: $25k → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
CT
CA
WV
VA
NM
TN
NC
OK
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
4/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Conigliaro Industries Inc — $50,000 · OtherConigliaro Industries IncSOUTH SUBURBAN COLLEGE — $50,000 · OtherSOUTH SUBURBAN COLLEGEIndividual grant recipient — $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAGILYX CORPORATION — $50,000 · OtherAGILYX CORPORATIONIndividual grant recipient — $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCITY OF COON RAPIDS — $50,000 · OtherCITY OF COON RAPIDSSt Lucie County — $50,000 · OtherSt Lucie CountyOSTEGO COUNTY SOLID WASTE DEPARTMENT — $50,000 · OtherOSTEGO COUNTY SOLID WASTE DEPARTMENTCOLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF CO — $50,000 · OtherCOLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COCITY OF HIGH POINT — $49,250 · OtherCITY OF HIGH POINTVILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT — $49,029 · OtherVILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTIndividual grant recipient — $49,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCITY OF AUSTIN - AUSTIN RESOURCE RECOVERY — $45,000 · OtherMADISON COUNTY — $42,925 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $38,800 · OtherRAY LOCATO RECYCLING CENTER — $29,450 · Other+2 more — $32,642 · OtherTHE RECYCLING PARTNERSHIP INC — $75,000 · EnvironmentTHE RECYCLING P…LIVE-THRIVE INC — $41,000 · EnvironmentLIVE-THRIVE INCKEEP AMERICA BEAUTIFUL INC — $25,000 · EnvironmentKEEP AMERICA BE…Keep California Beautiful Inc — $12,500 · EnvironmentKeep California…Binghampton Development Corporation — $50,000 · Community ImprovementTiny House Community Development Inc — $28,001 · Housing & Shelter
Other$876,096Environment$153,500Community Improvement$50,000Housing & Shelter$28,001

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE RECYCLING PARTNERSHIP INC — $75,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBinghampton Development Corporation — $50,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetLIVE-THRIVE INC — $41,000 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetTiny House Community Development Inc — $28,001 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetKEEP AMERICA BEAUTIFUL INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKeep California Beautiful Inc — $12,500 over 1y, 16% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE RECYCLING PARTNERSHIP INC
  • Who funds Binghampton Development Corporation
  • Who funds LIVE-THRIVE INC
  • Who funds Tiny House Community Development Inc
  • Who funds KEEP AMERICA BEAUTIFUL INC
  • Who funds Keep California Beautiful Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charities Aid Foundation AmericaVA8.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Foodservice Packaging Institute Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph