Skip to content

· Public charity

Foodbank of Southeastern Virginia

Leading the effort to eliminate hunger in our community.

$41M
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$33k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$605kReligion$120kHealth$33kHousing & Shelter$32k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $38,797, the rows itemized in this filing. The $41,353,506 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $41,314,709 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $33k
$32,951
Median grant
1
States reached
$35M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Healthy Chesapeake$32,951
Piney Grove Baptist Church$5,846
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Isle of Wight Christian Outreach Program: $20k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

33%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$260k · 4 repeat orgs$529k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
26

Total granted

$260k
$490k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+5%

Still filing today

25%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $39k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHealthHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WE
    WATERS EDGE COMMUNITY CHURCH OF GOD
    2× · 2021–2024 · $95k
  • ES
    EASTERN SHORE CHAPEL EPISCOPAL CHURCH - CHURCH PANTRY
    2× · 2021–2024 · $91k
  • SR
    Solid Rock Worldwide Outreach Ministry
    3× · 2021–2024 · $43k

Funded once

  • CI
    CHINCOTEAGUE ISLAND FOOD CLOSET
    one grant, 2024 · $56k
  • ML
    MOUNT LEBANON MISSIONARY BAPTIST
    one grant, 2021 · $45k
  • HR
    HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL ASYMCA
    one grant, 2024 · $39k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Church Women United

Jesus commanded, "love your neighbor as yourself." (mark 12:31) our ministry provides loving service to the poor and hungry. the organization will operate an ecumenical food pantry to serve those who need food assistance in york county and…

—
2
City of Refuge - South Hill Inc

Our program is designed to help give back to the Southern Virginia community. We have weekly programs in place geared towards youth, young adults, families and senior citizens. We reach these individuals through feeding and group meetings…

Human Services
3
Bread of Life Community Services
Food & Nutrition
4
Victory Life Church International

Church, religious

Religion
5
The Baker Center for Women Incorporated

The Baker Center for Womens mission is to provide support to the women of Hampton Roads by offering a safe transitional housing alternative and equip women with the resources needed to support their overall wellness to self-sufficiency.

Housing & Shelter
6
West Elkton Church of Christ Inc

Religious organization

—
7
Community for Christ Outreach

Religious Orginazation

Housing & Shelter
8
God Provides Ministry

To provide free food to homeless, veterans, and others

Food & Nutrition
9
Feed My Sheep Food Outreach Inc

It is our mission to provide food, clothing, household cleaning supplies, and personal hygiene products to low income seniors, veterans, homeless, children, and families.

Food & Nutrition
10
Victory At Sarasota Inc

We are a church, food bank, outreach that ministers the love of Jesus to our city and the surrounding cities by preaching and teaching the word of God every Sunday. We also minister to anyone with a food need weekly through our food bank.…

Religion
11
Dickenson County Food Bank

To provide food to the needy residents of Dickenson County Virginia

Food & Nutrition
12
House of Hope North Charleston

To reduce hunger and poverty in the Tri-County Area by providing individuals and families with food, clothing, shelter, resource and spiritual support while striving to employ, educate and empower.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oasis Commission On Social Ministry of Portsmouth - Chesapeake; the most unlike its peers is Casa De Adoracion Familiar Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WATERS EDGE COMMUNITY CHURCH OF GOD: $94,701 · OtherWATERS EDGE COMMUNITY CHURCH OF GODEASTERN SHORE CHAPEL EPISCOPAL CHURCH - CHURCH PANTRY: $91,000 · OtherEASTERN SHORE CHAPEL EPISCOPAL CHURCH - CHURCH PANTRYCHINCOTEAGUE ISLAND FOOD CLOSET: $56,200 · OtherCHINCOTEAGUE ISLAND FOOD CLOSETMOUNT LEBANON MISSIONARY BAPTIST: $45,000 · OtherMOUNT LEBANON MISSIONARY BAPTISTSolid Rock Worldwide Outreach Ministry: $43,057 · OtherSolid Rock Worldwide Outreach MinistryHAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL ASYMCA: $38,530 · OtherHAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL ASYMCACALVARY REVIVAL CHURCH: $33,673 · OtherCALVARY REVIVAL CHURCHPungoteague Community Church: $33,300 · Other+17 more: $194,467 · Other+17 moreOASIS COMMISSION ON SOCIAL MINISTRY OF PORTSMOUTH - CHESAPEAKE: $30,000 · Food & NutritionDOS SANTOS: $29,500 · Food & NutritionHEALTHY CHESAPEAKE INC: $32,951 · HealthLGBT LIFE CENTER: $9,655 · HealthJUDEO-CHRISTIAN OUTREACH CENTERINC: $31,600 · Housing & ShelterISLE OF WIGHT CHRISTIAN OUTREACH PROGRAM INC: $20,390 · Human ServicesCASA DE ADORACION FAMILIAR INC: $5,059 · Religion
Other$629,928Food & Nutrition$59,500Health$42,606Housing & Shelter$31,600Human Services$20,390Religion$5,059

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEALTHY CHESAPEAKE INC: $32,951 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetJUDEO-CHRISTIAN OUTREACH CENTERINC: $31,600 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetOASIS COMMISSION ON SOCIAL MINISTRY OF PORTSMOUTH - CHESAPEAKE: $30,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetDOS SANTOS: $29,500 over 1y, 22% of budgetISLE OF WIGHT CHRISTIAN OUTREACH PROGRAM INC: $20,390 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetLGBT LIFE CENTER: $9,655 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCASA DE ADORACION FAMILIAR INC: $5,059 over 1y, 2.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HEALTHY CHESAPEAKE INC ↗
  • Who funds JUDEO-CHRISTIAN OUTREACH CENTERINC ↗
  • Who funds OASIS COMMISSION ON SOCIAL MINISTRY OF PORTSMOUTH - CHESAPEAKE ↗
  • Who funds DOS SANTOS ↗
  • Who funds ISLE OF WIGHT CHRISTIAN OUTREACH PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds LGBT LIFE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CASA DE ADORACION FAMILIAR INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hampton Roads Community FoundationVA31.2× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hampton Roads Community Foundation · United Way of South Hampton Roads · Obici Healthcare Foundation Inc · Sentara Health · The Southeast Virginia Community Foundation · Langley for Families - the Foundation of Lfcu · United Way of Virginia's Eastern Shore Inc · Beazley Foundation Incorporated · The Blocker Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Foodbank of Southeastern Virginia funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Foodbank of Southeastern Virginia. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Foodbank of Southeastern Virginia’s filings →

    More from the funding graph