· Public charity
Food Bank of the Rockies
FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ignites the power of community to nourish people facing food insecurity.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
How this is measured
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SOUTH PARK SENIOR INC - TEFAP | $5,357 |
| WELLSPRING CHURCH - TEFAP | $4,928 |
| INTEGRATED FAMILY COMMUNITY SERVICES - TEFAP | $4,472 |
| Individual grant recipient | $4,468 |
| LIFEBRIDGE INC - TEFAP | $3,105 |
| LOVE INC OF YAMPA VALLEY - TEFAP | $1,777 |
| SALVATION ARMY CENTENNIAL - TEFAP | $1,777 |
| MISSISSIPPI AVE BAPTIST CHURCH - TEFAP | $1,777 |
| CHURCH OF DESTINY-TEFAP | $1,033 |
| HARVEST BIBLE CHURCH ELIZABETH - TEFAP | $295 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $49k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +176% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.
18 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- ACADAMS COUNTY EMERGENCY FOOD BANK9× · 2017–2025 · $40k · revenue +176%
- IFIntegrated Family Community Services9× · 2017–2025 · $31k · revenue +393%
- LLifeBridge2× · 2024–2025 · $11k · revenue +26%
Funded once
- DODEPT OF HUMAN SER GILPIN - TEFAP9× · 2017–2025 · $53k
- WDWE DON'T WASTE 40TH AVE - TEFAP4× · 2021–2024 · $44k
- WDWE DON'T WASTE GARDEN PLACE ACADEMY - TEFAP5× · 2020–2024 · $37k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Foothills Food Bank works to ensure access to quality, nutritious food to community members in need, and deliver services with respect and dignity.
Provide food to families in need within the local area.
To fight hunger and poverty by providing food, education, programs and resources to families in a dignified, personal and expeditious manner directly as a food pantry and as a food bank; without zip code restrictions.
Hebron Interfaith Human Services Inc serves as a resource to the community in times of crisis and need and assists people to regain their self-sufficiency. Food Assistance: During the year approximately 240,000 lbs of food were provided…
Provide emergency food for those in need.
Providing nutritious food to low income families and individuals in south clatsop county
The mission of All Faiths Pantry is to alleviate hunger by delivering nutritious groceries to low-income seniors and others of any age with mobility challenges at no cost to the recipient.
Food bank - to assist those families who face the dilemma of paying rent or buying food.
To provide food and services in a caring and dignified manner to neighbors in need
We provide food, household and personal items as available to combat food scarcity and poverty in our community.
How this is measured
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 118 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Food Bank of the Rockies funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Food Bank of the Rockies. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Food Bank of the Rockies’ filings →