Skip to content

· Public charity

Food Bank Council of Michigan Inc

Alleviate and prevent hunger amongst Michigan residents.

$128M
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$4.2M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$94M
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $19,102,740, the rows itemized in this filing. The $127,796,433 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $108,693,693 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$1,730,774
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Food Bank of Eastern Michigan$4,203,873
Feeding America West Michigan$3,695,111
Gleaners Community Food Bank$3,519,467
Forgotten Harvest$3,010,632
South Michigan Food Bank$1,730,774
Greater Lansing Food Bank$1,355,769
UPCAP$592,628
Food Gatherers$592,177
Copper Shores$402,309
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $593k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UPCAP: $593k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$93M · 7 repeat orgs$995k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
2

Total granted

$93M
$995k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+1528%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $995k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FB
    Food Bank of Eastern Michigan
    9× · 2017–2025 · $21M · revenue +43%
  • FA
    FEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGAN
    9× · 2017–2025 · $18M · revenue +38%
  • FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $17M · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • US
    UPCAP SERVICES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2025 · $593k · revenue +69%
  • CS
    COPPER SHORES COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2025 · $402k · revenue ×16
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food Bank Council of Michigan Inc

Alleviate and prevent hunger amongst Michigan residents.

—
2
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

—
3
Metro Food Rescue

The mission of metro food rescue is simple; waste less, feed more. we rescue food that would otherwise be discarded and deliver it to a network of food partners. thereby, helping to feed individuals and families in need.

Food & Nutrition
4
Second Harvest Heartland

Second harvest heartland's mission is to end hunger together. in partnership with more than 1,000 food shelves and hunger-relief programs in minnesota and western wisconsin, we provided 143 million meals to neighbors last year.

Food & Nutrition
5
Feeding America

Our mission is to advance change in America by ensuring equitable access to nutritious food for all in partnership with partner food banks, policymakers, supporters, and the communities we serve.

Food & Nutrition
6
Ferndale Food Bank

The ferndale food bank is a local food bank that distrbutes food to community members in need of assistance.

—
7
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
8
Mid-Ohio Foodbank

Mid-Ohio Foodbanks mission is to end hunger one nourishing meal at a time while co-creating communities where everyone thrives.

—
9
Community Food Bank of New Jersey Inc

We serve as a champion for addressing the root causes of hunger, delivering neighbor-centric solutions, and fostering collaborative partnerships across all sectors of society for New Jersey.

Food & Nutrition
10
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
11
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
12
Second Harvest Northland

End hunger together in NE Minnesota and NW Wisconsin.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding America West Michigan; the most unlike its peers is Copper Shores Community Health Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Food Bank of Eastern Michigan: $20,674,426 · Food & NutritionFood Bank of Eastern MichiganGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $19,839,079 · Food & NutritionGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGANFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $17,062,469 · Food & NutritionFORGOTTEN HARVEST INCGREATER LANSING FOOD BANK: $6,390,793 · Food & NutritionGREATER LANSING FOOD BANKFEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGAN: $18,072,092 · OtherFEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGANSOUTH MICHIGAN FOOD BANK: $8,004,198 · OtherSOUTH MICHIGAN FOOD BANKFOOD GATHERERS: $3,158,718 · OtherFOOD GATHERERSUPCAP SERVICES INC: $592,628 · Human ServicesCOPPER SHORES COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $402,309 · Health
Food & Nutrition$63,966,767Other$29,235,008Human Services$592,628Health$402,309

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFood Bank of Eastern Michigan: $20,674,426 over 9y, 5.7% of budgetGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $19,839,079 over 9y, 3.8% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGAN: $18,072,092 over 9y, 11% of budgetFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $17,062,469 over 9y, 4.7% of budgetSOUTH MICHIGAN FOOD BANK: $8,004,198 over 9y, 9.8% of budgetGREATER LANSING FOOD BANK: $6,390,793 over 9y, 7.6% of budgetFOOD GATHERERS: $3,158,718 over 9y, 3.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Food Bank of Eastern Michigan ↗
  • Who funds GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH MICHIGAN FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds GREATER LANSING FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds FOOD GATHERERS ↗
  • Who funds UPCAP SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds COPPER SHORES COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Food Bank Council of Michigan Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Food Bank Council of Michigan Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Food Bank Council of Michigan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph